#angry review

[angstylittlecatboy]

Cinema Sins did 1000x more damage to media criticism than YouTube comedy reviews did, fight me

[sirins384]

very much angry review on Thor: Rangnarok (very much spoilers as well)

I suspected that something has gone wrong when I saw the first trailer: trashy trash it was. Somewhat of a week ago I came across a comment that the film was 'super-hilarious'. At this point I could only hope it is not like that.

But the fact - it is. It is funny as fuck, jokes are everywhere, Guardians of the Galaxy 3. But what makes me angry and painfully sad is that like 80% of jokes are someone laughing at Loki and making him look like a fool.

Almost all the film long he looks like a dumb sidekick who worth nothing, who is good at nothing, who doesn't deserve anything rather than trowing empty beer can at him. The worst thing is that you can't not laugh here, it is like someone ridiculously slipping on the ice - you will laugh but you know there is nothing funny about that.

More than that, they stripped him of almost every trait he ever had. Like look at that first scene when Loki is still pretending to be Odin. I don't say he wouldn't put a statue for himself or produce a play but doing that so bluntly, straightforward and with no taste whatsoever?? I felt ashamed, cheeks covered red for that tasteless demonstration of power. N.B. I roleplayed Loki for more that three years and actually associated myself with him (still do sometimes). And I was ashamed of him. Like wHAT??!? How did you even managed that? Plus, Loki who couldn't play his own father well, who couldn't lie properly - what kind of thing that is? He has been lying and pretending for his whole life!

I will omit my frustration about Hela being Odin's daughter and Fenrir being hers, it is silly to expect Marvel to follow mythology through and through.

Also everyone could defeat Loki in combat. He won zero times and was never shown to use magic (illusions don't count, he didn't use them in combat). What?! Loki, the God(!!!) of Mischief?! Why did he nearly die after Halk beating him, but Thor was just okay and in condition to continue fighting? Yeah, Thor is mightier, whatever, but Loki is also not a human, he is yotun, ice giant, for god's sake!

The only condition I accept this film as canon is that in that final scene, Thor hugged Loki and Loki stabbed him, leaving to have his revenge to wash away all humiliation he endured. And I also hope he did steal Tesseract and that he won't side with Tanos.

I'm terribly frustrated and disappointed as it's not just 'my favourite character', it's a wasted opportunity to develop a character who from his very first appearance was much more interesting and deep than most of Avengers in their first films (I'm talking about cinematic universe only).

Loki is not a sidekick or a comic relief, he is not a fool or a looser. He's got his pride and story and reasoning behind almost everything he does. He is witty and smart and deserves respect. And he is not the one to be reduced to the character we saw in Thor: Ragnarok.

[peashooter85]

FUCK THIS MOVIE---Midway Movie Review (1976)

So I just watched this movie which is a historical film about the Battle of Midway made in 1976, and I hate to rag on what is supposedly a classic movie with legendary actors, but honestly this film sucks!  Now I can go on about all the historical inaccuracies of this film, but what bothered me about it was the god awful shitty film making!

First I’ll start with the good stuff. The cast was good. This film has legendary actors in it; Charleton Heston, Henry Fonda, James Coburn, Glenn Ford, Hal Holbrook, Robert Wagner, Robert Mitchum, Toshiro Mifune (Seven Samurai), Pat Morita (Mr. Miyagi in Karate Kid). These are all great actors and they probably could have done a better performance, but I have a feeling that has more to do with the screenplay and direction, rather than the fault of the actors.  The battle is done coherently and it makes sense, you can follow what is going on.  The characters are good. And that’s about it.

So what really bothered me about this movie? I’ll start with the Japanese. You can portray the Japanese either speaking Japanese, which to me is preferable, or you can have them speak English with Japanese accents, which is OK. What does Midway do? THEY HAVE THEM SPEAK ENGLISH AND DUB THEM WITH AMERICAN ACCENTS!!!! Why would you do that???!!!! It comes off as really fucking bizarre!!! Why did you have Toshiro Mifune, the Japanese version of John Wayne, speak English, then dub him with someone who sounds like my nextdoor neighbor? WHY DIDN’T YOU JUST HAVE HIM SPEAK JAPANESE YOU FUCKING MORONS!!!???? 

The thing that bothered me THE MOST was how through much of the battle they didn’t use their own footage. Much of the footage is scenes from six or seven other World War II movies from the 60′s and 70′s as well as stock WWII footage. To me this just really comes off as lazy. Compare this to Tora Tora Tora, which used all it’s own practical effects and no stock WWII footage whatsoever. Tora Tora Tora is a masterpiece. I don’t just bring it up as a comparison, but because Midway used a lot of footage from Tora Tora Tora. Yeah, that’s a great way to make a good move, just use footage from other movies! Fucking brilliant! I’m not saying that Midway doesn’t have it’s own practical effects, because it’s does.  Some of the effects are actually really good and impressive. Most are very dated, making it seem like the film was made in 1956, not 1976. 2001 Space Odyssey was made in 1969, Star Wars in 1977, and Apocalypse Now in 1979, so they really could have done better when it came to special effects. The action of the movie basically runs like this, you will have a scene with original footage and effects, then it will cut to WWII stock footage, then it will cut to footage from a totally different fucking movie!!! So basically a bunch of editors cut and pasted together footage from a bunch of different sources and turned it into a battle. I mean, they did a good job making a coherent battle out of all that random footage,but it’s distracting, lazy, and it sucks! I guess they could get away with it back in the day because most people wouldn’t have recognized much of the WWII stock footage. But imagine a WWII movie today where they have some of their own footage, intermixed with scenes from Saving Private Ryan, Band of Brothers, Saints and Soldiers, Flags of our Fathers, Hacksaw Ridge, and gratuitous amounts of WWII stock footage from the History Channel and Discovery Channel archives. Yeah how great would that movie be? Would you wanna watch that?

The worst part is a scene where a Japanese plane makes a kamikaze attack on the USS Yorktown.  WTF that never happened! The Japanese didn’t use Kamikazes until around the last year of the war! To add insult to injury they use stock WWII footage of a kamikaze attack on an aircraft carrier at the Battle of Okinawa in 1945 (I think it was footage of the USS Bunker Hill).  I mean, if you were an editor why would you put that in the movie? Did you really think no one would notice?  FUCK THIS MOVIE!!!!

Today it seems like film makers love to make remakes, reboots, and relaunches of older movies.  This would be an excellent candidate. With modern special effects and good screenwriting it would be an awesome film. Just don’t get that dipshit Michael Bay to direct it.

[angstylittlecatboy]

For as much as people like to dog on the comedy review genre that was common on early YouTube, Scott the Woz basically makes that kind of content

[goodjohnjr]

Starfield - Angry Review

Starfield – Angry Review What Is It? The YouTube video Starfield – Angry Review by the YouTube channel AngryJoeShow: Starfield – Angry Review Continue reading Starfield – Angry Review

View On WordPress

[angstylittlecatboy]

I find it weird when people hate on the angry review genre and then are subscribed to Caddicarus or Dunkey because they're just as caustic, if not more, and I just can't relate to liking sarcasm more than blunt anger. Autism? US Northeast upbringing? IDK.

I think Dunkey and Caddy are funny but as I get older I find I can only tolerate them in small doses. AVGN I can watch for hours, and the anger isn't why I can't watch NC, it's that he's bad at skits.

I think Todd in the Shadows still works for people because he never really incorporated the now more controversial elements of the angry review genre, and him getting less caustic could've just as easily been due to maturity or pop music getting better as it could be adapting to the changing YouTube landscape.

[wwelivestream247]

WWE Smackdown 10/9/2018 - TRASH review LIVE !

WWE Smackdown 10/9/2018 – TRASH review LIVE !

Click Here to See WWE Live Stream Event (SmackDown) ■Donate LIVE To The screen OR Super Chat utilizing $ sign

Support the particular show monthly on Patreon â–? Patreon. com JoeCroninShow

Join us on the DISCORD!

â–? Interact with myself upon Facebook! Facebook. com/RageinternetRadio or even @RageInternetRadio

My four A person Tube Channels You should SIGN UP FOR!

â—? ( Struggling ) â…

View On WordPress

[frowerssx2]

It makes me so angry that the amount of energy you use hasn't be updated! You wait around an hour for full energy just for ten minutes of gameplay. What's worse is that I would watch a walkthrough of this game rather than waiting for the energy and the lack of gameplay