I think that anon was asking why would the trio kill someone for resurrecting themself
I figured as much, but you, or anyone who has a question, has to lead up to the topic. I mean to me, it felt a bit out the blue as there was no build up to the question. That kind of “they” could’ve also been associated with Kibosh too. Pardon me for my confusion, I just like more clarified questions. Maybe it’s just me overthinking things, but I do see a growing trend of people typing out things without actually proofreading them. I’m no better either, I often have to go back and make sure what I said was clear.
It’s fine to make some errors here and there, but I am noticing it more often than not. I strayed off the question, my bad.
Just to cut straight to an answer for this ⬇️
The trio, as a unit, wouldn’t want anyone using this technology that’s been sitting underwater for years. A machine that could bring life right back into you. That’s a very powerful and useful thing to have at your disposal. Along with this, the trio also know that this house of theirs is a mystical gold mine of possibilities and nifty artifacts. Some that have always been in the estate, such as The Lazarus, and other abandoned trinkets & tools that belonged to intruders that never made it out the house.
No point in looking for their bones or any other evidence of their existence. It’s already gone.
The reason for them wanting to extinguish a soul that’s been resurrected by THAT machine is because they shouldn’t have. But they will always have an excuse for James & Kat. Just mere humans who stumbled upon a once in a lifetime miracle. No witch, no vampire, just pure genuine human beings who have no knowledge of monsters and magic. Innocent souls.
I don’t recall if I said the trio hated resurrected souls? If I did I need a source on where I said that. Though I do agree with the idea that the trio would make it a spectacle of mocking souls.
“Sorry, was the freedom not good enough for ya?”
“Yeah, is havin’ flesh n’ bones really dat special??”
“Can’t see the appeal of it.”
