“What’s your stance on aces in the lgbt+ community”
“Aces aren’t inherently LGBT+” = person is obviously exclus
“I’m neutral on ace discourse/I don’t pay attention to it so I can’t answer” = person is exclus and is too afraid of the backlash of admitting it. There is no such thing as a “neutral” stance. Either you think all asexuals are LGBT+, or you don’t. It’s 100% an “either yes or no” issue.
“I refuse to allow or answer any ace discourse on this blog/ please I’m so tired of ace discourse” / person avoids answering the question at all costs = They’re exclus again, and are avoiding answering due to not wanting any backlash or losing followers
Anyway, an inclusionist wouldn’t be afraid to openly say they think aces are LGBT+ . Anyone who answers that question with anything other than a “yes they are” probably is an exclusionist.
When you support someone, it shouldn’t be hard to admit to it. It really isn’t a hard question it’s a simple “yes or no” and people who can’t even do so much as answer a simple yes or no question for us are probably assholes who aren’t on our side.
I keep seeing people reblogging from people who refuse to give their opinion on it or say they are “neutral”, that turn out to be shitty people who make fun of us, so I’m just pointing this out cuz it needs to end. Non a-specs can reblog but don’t add anything