Proshipper ≠ comshippers ≠ dark/problematicshipper
Even though it may seem silly, these labels do not mean the same thing! Each one has its meaning and use even though they sound "similar".
seen from Yemen
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from Nepal
seen from Portugal
seen from Yemen

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Portugal
seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
Proshipper ≠ comshippers ≠ dark/problematicshipper
Even though it may seem silly, these labels do not mean the same thing! Each one has its meaning and use even though they sound "similar".
"Marius' fans are unwell!"
Well, I'm always better off than people who send anonymous asks, moralizing about fictional characters (which I remember don't exist), fictional stories (vampires don't exist), going to harass real people 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
And without Anne Rice and "the lousy problematic stuff she wrote," there would be no your little fucking show ❤️❤️❤️
you know antis don't believe their own bullshit because they STILL use ao3. would you ever support a platform that you thought genuinely had child porn? that genuinely profited from sexual abuse of children? the fact that they STILL USE AO3 despite CLAIMING that they think it's a cp site either paints them as hypocrites using their lies to bully ppl as fandom spaces, or as morally bankrupt ppl okay w sexual abuse of children for fanfiction. sorry.
Madness according to intellectuals: refers to complex nosographic profiles (often decompensated psychosis/insanity) which can express themselves differently according to character traits, age of the person, personal history, familial history, culture, nature and intensity of traumatic events... Can be episodic or chronic. Not always « irreversible ». ABSOLUTELY NOT ONE.
Madness according to antis: noun used in parallele with some others (tyrant for example) to describe a character/person to justify hatred and mistreatment of this character. Can be accompanied by agressive rationalizations or insults in case the anti does not feel confident enough in himself/herself to rely only on that (aka defensive mode: attacking before being attacked). However, these rationalizations aren’t entirely based on objective facts, more on subjective facts that can be opened to interpretation. Based on a split view: the good vs the bad. ONE ( bad), opposed to the vision of the anti (good).