Anythingbatch ends up in a lose-lose situation.
So Anythingbatch tweeted as one of the first “fan” accounts about article and the pics from TheSun
Obviously some fans condemn sneaky pics and pap pics and won’t post them. Pics of a celebrity’s child are also illegal in some countries and many fans don’ t like them at all. It seems a very private moment and occasion has been somewhat ruined for BC and SH, right?
So Anythingbatch now tweets:
Aha so does that mean that Benedict Cumberbatch invited paparazzis to take these pics of this very private family occasion? Why would he? And why are these photos “beautiful done”? Because they prove that the Christening took place and show a baby but the umbrella strategically hides the kid’s face and both SH and BC are not shown from the front either? Is that what you are trying to say, Anythingbatch?
And “controlled” in an “uncontrolled” situation. Ok either you are a PR-twitter account run by someone who has major difficulties to show her clients as impeccable or you are indeed run by a fan who just desperately wants to excuse everything BC does. Because it sure as hell looks like he invited paps himself. So all in all does Anythingbatch admit that staged pap pics exist? *gasp* Because usually goody-goody fans won’t dare claim that their idol calls paps himself/herself.
So what are you saying, honey? ^_^ BC and SH didn’t invite a photographer from The Sun. Hm maybe they hired a photographer and sold those two pics to The Sun themselves then? Making maybe a little bit of money off their two pics?
Oh and here a discussion about the sensitive subject of BC’s closeness to Buddhism.
The two pap pics are legal because the Baby’s face isn’t shown and the pics are from an “article”. Well, it’s from the much hated tabloid, The Sun. And you, Anythingbatch, called some photographers who took pics of BC and SH at a celebrity event “hounds” I believe. But the photographer who got them on this day of all days, their small child’s christening isn’t a pap. No no, these are exclusive photos, beautifully done. The photo shoot was “controlled in an uncontrolled situation.”.I don’t know what Anythignbatch calls “uncontrolled” about this. Seems to me that BC and SH wanted to prove that the christening took place on the Isle of Wight and Mottistone church, but still hide the Baby’s face. So the umbrella was held up like this on purpose. No decent photo of any of the three though and still for some reason these pics are “beautifully done”.
