#ao classpecting

[aortaobservatory]

A Detailed Overview of Classes

-aortaObservatory

The Classes of Homestuck are left up to interpretation; they were designed for the characters who hold their titles, and as such, there is inherent bias within them even within canon. Like many other classpectors, I believe they can stand alone, beyond how canon defines them (and, if I am being honest, beyond the sheer lack of canon material for them). It is simply a matter of straining out what they are defined to be in canon from the characters, and from those strains, foraging in the same direction based on a number of factors (such as the class's pair and inverse pair).

In this post (A Brief Overview of Classes), I gave brief statements of what each class was and what it did.

In this post (A Look Into My Classpecting Process, with a focus on Karkat), I explained how I initially defined the classes as based on my understanding of the aspects, comparing the characters who held the same titles and stripping away all that differed between aspect and character trait until only "class" remained. From this, I defined each class beyond their canon bias and fully fleshed them out.

In this post, I will attempt to go into a bit more depth for each class, defining certain classes as active/passive, and explaining why their pairs are what they are, how they work, as well as what they do. How I classify the classes is in a trio of quadrants (four classes to one group, with three groups for a total of 12 classes). Three groups of four.

This is my overview of the classes. My interpretation.

To define: Class is the intended role of the player; how they interact with or are shaped by their aspect, either actively (directly) or passively (indirectly). Active-Passive class pairs are defined by a primary word that dictates what they do, and the quantity of the hidden secondary word that dictates the difference between the pair.

Primary words: Know, Change, Utilize, Allocate, Enhance, Destroy

Secondary words: Experience, Embody, Skill, Value, Reliance, Control

Know - Do or Do Not have Experience

Change - Do or Do Not Embody

Utilize - Do or Do Not have Skill

Allocate - Do or Do Not Value

Enhance - Do or Do Not have Reliance

Destroy - Do or Do Not Control

Perception Classes - Know and Change

perception: "immediate or intuitive recognition or appreciation, as of moral, psychological, or aesthetic qualities; insight; intuition; discernment."

The "Knowers" are those who do (Mage) or do not (Seer) have experience with their aspect. The Mage directly has too much experience with their aspect, while the Seer indirectly has too little experience with their aspect by being surrounded by their inverse aspect. In other words, a Mage knows, and a Seer does not know.

Mages are flooded with their aspect, uniquely experiencing both the good and the bad of it. As a result, they gain a unique understanding of what their aspect is or does, often resenting it or becoming jaded and frustrated with it, but never rejecting it. Their challenge is to become open to new insight or different perspectives than their own.

Seers study their aspect, craving knowledge of it from their previous lack of it. They seek knowledge of their aspect with a fierce intensity in order to gain more understanding of it, acknowledging the potential consequences of doing so and dealing with them later. Their challenge is to learn how to translate their insight and knowledge into action and decision, as well as learn how to manage their engagement with their aspect so as to not overwhelm themselves or others.

The "Changers" are those who do (Heir) or do not (Witch) embody their aspect. The Heir indirectly embodies too much of their aspect, often unintentionally or by getting stuck on some part of their inverse, while the Witch directly embodies too little of their aspect by picking and choosing what to embody and what not to embody. In other words, a Witch changes, and a Heir does not change.

Witches are self-assured and conclusive individualists. They pick and choose which parts and pieces of their aspect fit into their own already determined desires, making their aspect embody themself and changing it to suit their own wants and needs. Their challenge is to achieve a stable balance in themselves without losing themselves to their aspect or their own changing whims.

Heirs inherit and embody their aspect, allowing their aspect to change themselves or itself. They have huge amounts of aspect related strengths, allowing themselves to be surrounded by their aspect or naturally gravitating towards it. Their challenge is to not get stuck on their aspect, to know when to move on and change themselves to keep themselves balanced.

Inverses:

The Mage and the Heir are inverse classes; for example, a Mage of Doom is also an Heir of Life (inverse), and an Heir of Breath is also a Mage of Blood (inverse). A Mage has too much experience with their aspect, and as a result, fully embodies and gets stuck on their inverse. An Heir fully embodies and gets stuck on their aspect, and as a result, has too much experience with their inverse.

The Seer and the Witch are inverse classes; for example, a Seer of Light is also a Witch of Void (inverse), and a Witch of Space is also a Seer of Time (inverse). A Seer doesn't have much experience with their aspect but is surrounded by their inverse, and as a result, picks and chooses pieces of their inverse to embody to further their study. A Witch chooses pieces of their aspect to embody and ignores what they don't want to embody, and as a result, doesn't have much experience with their inverse and thus gains a desire to study it to fill in their missing pieces.

Alignments:

Those who Know (Mage, Seer, knowers pair)

Those who Change (Witch, Heir, changers pair)

Those who do experience and embody (Mage, Heir, inverse pair)

Those who do not experience and embody (Seer, Witch, inverse pair)

Those who directly Know/Change (Mage, Witch, active pair)

Those who indirectly Know/Change (Seer, Heir, passive pair)

Volition Classes - Utilize and Allocate

volition: "the act of willing, choosing, or resolving; exercise of willing"

The "Utilizers" are those who do (Knight) or do not (Page) have skill with their aspect. The Knight directly has too much skill with their aspect, while the Page indirectly has too little skill with their aspect, often focused on compensating for the lack of their inverse. In other words, a Knight utilizes, and a Page does not utilize.

Knights are extremely adept with their aspect, their driving effort to protect it and others through it. They are loyal to their aspect's cause and naturally gifted with it, using it as a tool to achieve whatever they set themselves to. Their challenge is to learn how to be less harsh on themselves, to accept and learn from failure, and to accept the assistance of others when they need it.

Pages start unskilled in their aspect, learning how it works and how to use it to its full potential over time. In their many attempts to master their aspect, they teach others the value of their aspect, becoming an unintentional source of inspiration. Their challenge is to keep at it, learn from failure, and eventually master their aspect, being able to confidently provide their aspect to others.

The "Allocators" are those who do (Rogue) or do not (Thief) value their aspect. The Rogue indirectly values too much of their aspect, giving it away until there is nothing left within themself, while the Thief directly values too little of their aspect by taking it without caring for it. In other words, a Thief allocates to themself, and a Rogue does not allocate to themself.

Thieves take their aspect, either craving it fiercely from their lack of it in their lives or simply because they like it, stealing and hoarding it all for themselves and their own personal benefit. Despite their outward confidence with their aspect, they often take it at face-value without learning of its true value, being unsatisfied with how much of their aspect they hoard and craving more and more. Their challenge is to focus less on attaining and more on learning about the value their aspect, as well as to let others have their aspect and learning why it is important to others.

Rogues give their aspect away, either because they have a lot of it already, or are able to get it so easily they don't know what to do with so much of it. They often know the true value of their aspect, and are able to see where there is too much or too little of their aspect and redistribute it in a balanced way around themselves. Their challenge is to not let their aspect run dry within themself, and to learn how to healthily balance their aspect in themselves.

Inverses:

The Knight and the Rogue are inverse classes; for example, a Knight of Time is also a Rogue of Space (inverse), and a Rogue of Void is also a Knight of Light (inverse). A Knight has too much skill with using their aspect, and as a result, fully values their inverse and gives it away to others. A Rogue fully values and gives away their aspect to others, and as a result, has too much skill with using their inverse.

The Page and the Thief are inverse classes; for example, a Page of Breath is also a Thief of Blood (inverse), and a Thief of Light is also a Page of Void (inverse). A Page doesn't have much skill with using their aspect, and as a result, seeks their inverse because they think it will come easier to them (an act which ignores the value of the inverse). A Thief desperately craves their aspect for their lack of value towards it (or additionally, a physical lack of it), and as a result, doesn't have much skill with using their inverse.

Alignments:

Those who Utilize (Knight, Page, utilizers pair)

Those who Allocate (Thief, Rogue, allocators pair)

Those who do have skill and value (Knight, Rogue, inverse pair)

Those who do not have skill and value (Page, Thief, inverse pair)

Those who directly Utilize/Allocate (Knight, Thief, active pair)

Those who indirectly Utilize/Allocate (Page, Rogue, passive pair)

Passion Classes - Enhance and Destroy

passion: "any powerful or compelling emotion or feeling, as love or hate"

The "Enhancers" are those who do (Sylph) or do not (Maid) have reliance on their aspect. The Sylph directly has too much reliance on their aspect, while the Maid indirectly has too little reliance on their aspect, often told how to think of it or forced to rely on others instead. In other words, a Sylph enhances, and a Maid does not enhance.

Sylphs start off relying on themselves for their aspect, attempting to heal, restore, and enhance their aspect in others. They are a pure source of their aspect for others, and though this can cause frustration and irritation in themselves and others, they can see ways for their aspect to help and heal the struggling of others. Their challenge is to learn how to listen to the needs of others instead of assuming they know best, and to balance themselves by learning that it's okay to rely on others for their aspect sometimes.

Maids start off pushed around by others' view of their aspect, but eventually allow their aspect to heal, restore, and enhance themselves, making them into an entirely new person and purifying their aspect to themselves. They start out relying on others for their aspect or being told by others how to interact with their aspect. Their challenge is to listen to themselves instead of others, and to not let others opinions dilute their aspect as they restore it for themselves and allow it to make them into a new person.

The "Destroyers" are those who do (Bard) or do not (Prince) have control over their aspect. The Bard indirectly controls too much of their aspect, often avoiding it to the point of deterioration, while the Prince directly controls too little of their aspect, generating frustration and anger with which to destroy. In other words, a Prince destroys intentionally, and a Bard does not destroy intentionally.

Princes destroy their aspect with their aspect or in the name of their aspect, and as a result, often end up appearing as their inverse aspect at first glance. Princes start off with disdain or hate for their aspect, likely because of its overwhelming presence in their lives, and because despite its abundance, they can never seem to grasp or control it for themselves. Their challenge is to be able to recognize their aspect's presence in themselves before they destroy themselves beyond repair, and learn that they do not need to control or bend their aspect to their will.

Bards allow their aspect to be destroyed via simply not reaching out for it, and ignoring its presence in their lives, leading to them appearing as their inverse aspect at first glance. This is typically due to stubbornness and/or a fear of being controlled by their aspect; while they may see benefits to what it could offer them, they can also see all the downsides to it simply because of their fear of what could go wrong. Their challenge is to be able to embrace their aspect and not be ruled by its whims, learning to control the way it impacts themselves without letting it be destroyed.

Inverses:

The Sylph and the Bard are inverse classes; for example, a Sylph of Space is also a Bard of Time (inverse), and a Bard of Rage is also a Sylph of Hope (inverse). A Sylph has too much reliance on their aspect and themself, and as a result, allows their inverse to deteriorate out of stubbornness and/or fear of it. A Bard has too much control over their aspect but allows their aspect to deteriorate from their own stubbornness and/or fear of it, and as a result, has too much reliance on their inverse.

The Maid and the Prince are inverse classes; for example, a Maid of Life is also a Prince of Doom (inverse), and a Prince of Hope is also a Maid of Rage (inverse). A Maid doesn't have much reliance on their aspect or themself because they are surrounded by their inverse, and as a result, destroys their inverse in an attempt to purify themself. A Prince has too little control over their aspect despite being surrounded by it, and in their attempts to make their aspect obey, doesn't have much reliance on their inverse.

Alignments:

Those who Enhance (Sylph, Maid, enhancers pair)

Those who Destroy (Prince, Bard, destroyers pair)

Those who do have reliance and control (Sylph, Bard, inverse pair)

Those who do not have reliance and control (Maid, Prince, inverse pair)

Those who directly Enhance/Destroy (Sylph, Prince, active pair)

Those who indirectly Enhance/Destroy (Maid, Bard, passive pair)

[aortaobservatory]

Classes of Light - AO Classpecting

Chosen Keywords: Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning

TEZ Keywords: Knowledge-seekers, students, problem-solvers, precision, scholars, researchers, resourceful, driven, (fussy, pedantic, insensitive)

CANON: Those bound to the aspect of Light are the universe's knowledge-seekers. They are, above all, driven to learn and understand. They are great alchemists, able to take multiple sources of information and synthesize them into something useful. They are scholars and researchers, absolutely dedicated to knowledge for knowledge's sake. They are the ultimate students, and although that might conjure up the image of people sitting around peacefully waiting for knowledge to be brought to them, that couldn't be further from the truth. The Light-bound will go after knowledge with a fierce intensity that others may find distasteful. They aren't overly concerned with laws or norms, either. They often take rules as simple suggestions, instead searching for loopholes or work-arounds. At their best, the Light-bound are resourceful and driven. At their worst they can be fussy, pedantic, and insensitive.

All of the analysis written below is my own writing, analysis, and thoughts as based on the sources I consulted. The statements are my own analysis, but they may function as a "fill in the blank" statement for you to create your own interpretation of the classpect as you please by replacing the aspect word with any of the provided keywords above.

Sources consulted: (dahniwitchoflight), (rosespecting), (godtier-haven), (TEZ), (MSPA Wiki)

LINK: (Classpecting Analysis Masterpost)

TAGS: [Mage], [Seer], [Witch], [Heir]

TAGS: [Knight], [Page], [Thief], [Rogue]

TAGS: [Sylph], [Maid], [Prince], [Bard]

-aortaObservatory

Knowers/Changers

Mage (Active): Know - Too Much Experience with Light

A Mage of Light is almost constantly experiencing knowledge and evaluation from the people around them and their surroundings, which gives them a unique understanding of how insight and the meaning of something can help a situation... or hurt a situation.

A Mage of Light is flooded with Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), uniquely experiencing both the good and the bad of it. As a result, they gain a unique understanding of what Light is and does, often resenting it or becoming jaded and frustrated with it, but never rejecting it. Their challenge is to become open to new insight or different perspectives than their own.

Heir of Void (Inverse): As the Mage of Light knows Light in a flood of both good and bad, they end up embodying Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they know and experience Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they fully embody and thus must change Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Mage of Light does not undergo the Heir of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Heir class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Seer (Passive): Know - Too Little Experience with Light

A Seer of Light is surrounded by secrecy and many potential unknowns, and lacks knowledge and insight in their life, and as a result are driven to learn everything they can about meaningful evaluation in order to understand what they previously lacked.

A Seer of Light studies Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), craving knowledge of it from their previous lack of it. They seek knowledge of Light with a fierce intensity in order to gain more understanding of it, acknowledging the potential consequences of doing so and dealing with them later. Their challenge is to learn how to translate their insight and knowledge into action and decision, as well as learn how to manage their engagement with Light so as to not overwhelm themself or others.

Witch of Void (Inverse): As the Seer of Light attempts to gain experience with Light from their previous lack of it, they end up changing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they change and thus half embody Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities), they gain experience with and thus know Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Seer of Light does not undergo the Witch of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Witch class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Witch (Active): Change - Too Little Embodiment of Light

A) A Witch of Light embodies knowledge and the insight it gives them, in order to change their own and others evaluation of what something means.

B) A Witch of Light embodies the evaluation of what something means, in order to change their own and others knowledge and the insight it gives them.

Witches are self-assured and conclusive individualists. They pick and choose which parts and pieces of Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning) fit into their own already determined desires, making Light embody themself and changing it to suit their own wants and needs. Their challenge is to achieve a stable balance in themself without losing themself to Light or their own changing whims.

Seer of Void (Inverse): As the Witch of Light changes the pieces of Light within themself, they end up experiencing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they change and half embody Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they gain experience with and thus know Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Witch of Light does not undergo the Seer of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Seer class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Heir (Passive): Change - Too Much Embodiment of Light

An Heir of Light embodies the ability of evaluation, meaning they are knowledgable; however, only by changing themself can they change the insight they gain and the meaning of it.

An Heir of Light inherits and embodies Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), allowing Light to change themself or itself. They have huge amounts of Light related strengths, allowing themself to be surrounded by Light or naturally gravitating towards it. Their challenge is to not get stuck on Light, to know when to move on and change themself to keep themself balanced.

Mage of Void (Inverse): As the Heir of Light embodies Light within themself, they end up knowing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they fully embody and thus must change Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they know and experience Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Heir of Light does not undergo the Mage of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Mage class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

-

Utilizers/Allocators

Knight (Active): Utilize - Too Much Skill with Light

A Knight of Light would be very skilled in using the knowledge they possess and the insight it gives them, to protect and defend the evaluation of others and the meaning given to them.

A Knight of Light is extremely adept with their Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), their driving effort to protect it and others through it. They are loyal to Light's cause and naturally gifted with it, using it as a tool to achieve whatever they set themself to. Their challenge is to learn how to be less harsh on themself, to accept and learn from failure, and to accept the assistance of others when they need it.

Rogue of Void (Inverse): As the Knight of Light utilizes Light from their loyalty to it, they end up valuing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they utilize and are skilled with Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they value and thus give/allocate Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Knight of Light does not undergo the Rogue of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Rogue class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Page (Passive): Utilize - Too Little Skill with Light

A Page of Light is a beginner when it comes to learning and evaluating the knowledge they gain, but they repeatedly strive to master it using the insight they've acquired and the meaning they've ascribed to it.

A Page of Light starts unskilled in Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), learning how it works and how to use it to its full potential over time. In their many attempts to master Light, they teach others the value of Light, becoming an unintentional source of inspiration. Their challenge is to keep at it, learn from failure, and eventually master Light, being able to confidently provide Light to others.

Thief of Void (Inverse): As the Page of Light attempts to gain skill with Light from their previous lack of it, they end up allocating Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they take/allocate and thus do not value Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities), they gain skill with and thus utilize Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Page of Light does not undergo the Thief of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Thief class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Thief (Active): Allocate - Too Little Value towards Light

A Thief of Light lacks knowledge and evaluation in their life, resulting in a fierce desire to possess such things for themself and leading to them not understanding the value of the insights they gain and what that means, as they take knowledge and the evaluations of others from others and hoard it all to themself for their own benefit.

A Thief of Light takes Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), either craving it fiercely from their lack of it in their lives or simply because they like it, stealing and hoarding it all for themself and their own personal benefit. Despite their outward confidence with Light, they often take it at face-value without learning of its true value, being unsatisfied with how much Light they hoard and craving more and more. Their challenge is to focus less on attaining and more on learning about the value their aspect, as well as to let others have their aspect and learning why it is important to others.

Page of Void (Inverse): As the Thief of Light allocates pieces of Light to themself, they end up gaining skill with Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they take/allocate and do not value Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they gain skill with and thus utilize Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Thief of Light does not undergo the Page of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Page class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Rogue (Passive): Allocate - Too Much Value towards Light

A Rogue of Light would redistribute, allow others to take, and/or give knowledge and insight to others in the name of balancing the meanings born of evaluation.

A Rogue of Light gives Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning) away, either because they have a lot of it already, or are able to get it so easily they don't know what to do with so much of it. They often know the true value of Light, and are able to see where there is too much or too little of Light and redistribute it in a balanced way around themself. Their challenge is to not let Light run dry within themself, and to learn how to healthily balance Light in themself.

Knight of Void (Inverse): As the Rogue of Light values Light within themself, they end up utilizing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they value and thus give/allocate Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they utilize and are skilled with Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Rogue of Light does not undergo the Knight of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Knight class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

-

Enhancers/Destroyers

Sylph (Active): Enhance - Too Much Reliance on Light

A Sylph of Light is a pure source of insight and the meaning behind it, and driven by knowledge and evaluation, attempt to restore/purify the meaning behind others insights.

A Sylph of Light starts off relying on themself for Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), attempting to heal, restore, and enhance Light in others. They are a pure source of Light for others, and though this can cause frustration and irritation in themself and others, they can see ways for Light to help and heal the struggling of others. Their challenge is to learn how to listen to the needs of others instead of assuming they know best, and to balance themself by learning that it's okay to rely on others for Light sometimes.

Bard of Void (Inverse): As the Sylph of Light enhances Light from their love of it, they end up fearing control of Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they enhance and rely on Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they fear control of and thus destroy Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Sylph of Light does not undergo the Bard of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Bard class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Maid (Passive) - Too Little Reliance on Light

A Maid of Light relies on anyone or anything but themself to tell them knowledge and information as well as what it means, before learning how to rely on themself, restoring and purifying their knowledge and what it means for themself through precise evaluation and insight.

A Maid of Light starts off pushed around by others' view of Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning), but eventually allow Light to heal, restore, and enhance themself, making them into an entirely new person and purifying their aspect to themself. They start out relying on others for Light or being told by others how to interact with Light. Their challenge is to listen to themself instead of others, and to not let others opinions dilute their aspect as they restore it for themself and allow it to make them into a new person.

Prince of Void (Inverse): As the Maid of Light attempts to gain reliance on Light from their previous lack of it, they end up destroying Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they destroy and thus cannot control Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities), they gain reliance on and thus enhance Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Maid of Light does not undergo the Prince of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Prince class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Prince (Active): Destroy - Too Little Control of Light

A Prince of Light is surrounded by knowledge and the evaluative demeanor they crave, but they can't control it or have no means of reaching it, so they lash out because of their own insight and meaning, to destroy the evaluated knowledge that others have, in the name of their own insight and meaning.

A Prince of Light destroys Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning) with Light or in the name of Light, and as a result, often end up appearing as Void (Secrecy, Unknown, Potential, Possibilities) at first glance. Princes start off with disdain or hate for Light, likely because of its overwhelming presence in their lives, and because despite its abundance, they can never seem to grasp or control it for themself. Their challenge is to be able to recognize Light's presence in themself before they destroy themself beyond repair, and learn that they do not need to control or bend Light to their will.

Maid of Void (Inverse): As the Prince of Light destroys pieces of Light in themself and others, they end up gaining reliance on Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have an indirect relationship with Void; because they destroy and cannot control Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they gain reliance on and thus enhance Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Prince of Light does not undergo the Maid of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Maid class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

~

Bard (Passive): Destroy - Too Much Control of Light

A Bard of Light is surrounded by a lot of evaluated knowledge, but fears being controlled by it or fears the control such things have over them, and as such ignores the evaluated knowledge and allows it to deteriorate via keeping it unknown and letting it wonder into possibilities; only by embracing meaningful insight can they begin to destroy the secrecy that destroyed them.

A Bard of Light allows Light (Knowledge, Evaluation, Insight, Meaning) to be destroyed via simply not reaching out for it, and ignoring its presence in their lives, leading to them appearing as Void (Secrecy, Unknown, Potential, Possibilities) at first glance. This is typically due to a fear of being controlled by Light; while they may see benefits to what it could offer them, they can also see all the downsides to it simply because of their fear of what could go wrong. Their challenge is to be able to embrace Light and not be ruled by its whims, learning to control the way it impacts themself without letting it be destroyed.

Sylph of Void (Inverse): As the Bard of Light fears control of Light within themself and others, they end up enhancing Void, whether on purpose or accidental. They have a direct relationship with Void; because they fear control of and destroy Light (that which is knowledge, evaluation, insight, and meaning), they enhance and rely on Void (that which is secrecy, unknown, potential, and possibilities). Because the inverse classpect is a ghost of the true classpect, the Bard of Light does not undergo the Sylph of Void's challenge; their relationship with the Sylph class and the Void aspect is purely surface level.

[aortaobservatory]

Maid of Rage

A Maid of Rage relies on authenticity of others and things around them, and gets frustrated when this doesn't end up working out easily for them. They attempt to control their beliefs by relying on the truth; but because they cannot control the ideals of others, their reliance on the truth of others is soured. This means they can often fall into a habit of attempting to force what they believe to be true onto others, often without checking to see what they believe is true or not.

[aortaobservatory]

knight of space please!!!!!

Knight of [Space]:

Utilize - Too Much Skill with Space

A player extremely skilled with [Innovation and Variation], and actively uses every part of [Journeys and Patience] as a tool to defend themselves and those around them

A Knight of Space would be very skilled in using innovation and variation, to protect and defend the journeys of others and their patience on them.

Knights are extremely adept with their aspect, their driving effort to protect it and others through it. They are loyal to their aspect's cause and naturally gifted with it, using it as a tool to achieve whatever they set themself to. Their challenge is to learn how to be less harsh on themselves, to accept and learn from failure, and to accept the assistance of others when they need it.

Inverse Classpect Analysis of Knight

Knight of Space: Space (Innovation, Journeys, Variation, Patience) is actively there. Too much skill with aspect causes innate utilization of it.

Inverse: Rogue of Time

By being actively skilled in Space (Innovation, Journeys, Variation, Patience), the Knight passively gives Time (Repetition, Goals, Efficiency, Restlessness) to others as they utilize Space (Innovation, Journeys, Variation, Patience).

Value of Time (Repetition, Goals, Efficiency, Restlessness) in others is given by the Knight's skill with Space (Innovation, Journeys, Variation, Patience).

The analysis written above is my own writing, analysis, and thoughts. The statements are my own analysis, but they may function as a “fill in the blank” statement for you to create your own interpretation of the classpect as you please.

-aortaObservatory

[aortaobservatory]

would lovelovelove to hear ur take on the rage aspect in general.

You've actually asked me about my favorite aspect and I will GLADLY take this opportunity to ramble about it (and, I suppose, touch a bit on its inverse as well). I actually wish I was this aspect instead sometimes; I present as very punk in my offline life and every Ragebound I've met has always been the most delightful company I've ever kept. (I suppose that might also be a very Heartbound thing to wish for, to be of another aspect...)

Of the twelve aspects, I will argue that Rage and Hope are the most commonly and grossly misunderstood. When they are flattened into one dimensional concepts, they are flattened into words that are not even in the realm of correct. Because of what we see in canon, Rage and Hope tend to get flattened into the "angry aspect" and the "positive aspect". These are incorrect understandings. Hope is about ideology and the systems built by them (such as government, or organized religion). Rage is about activism and digging out the truth. It is a very active aspect.

From The Extended Zodiac, I pulled these keywords from the Rage Aspect description. These would be the "canon" traits; they are what I adhere to when analyzing, but it should also be understood that this concept encompasses much more to do with than these keywords. Its "vibe", if you will, is much more than what is written.

TEZ Rage Keywords: Chaos, contempt, truth-seekers, doubters, stubborn, volatile, unpredictable, original, revolutionary, fearless, (cruel, uncompromising, vicious)

The words I chose to represent Rage in my analyses of the classpects are "Skepticism, Truth-seeking, Rebellion, Stubbornness". Like the other aspects, Rage is not an inherently good or bad aspect; it is neutral in its purest form.

Rage is what brings change. It is rebellion against unfair government systems, it is breaking free of internal biases, it is going out and finding the truth outside of the propaganda you have been fed. Rage aligns with punk very well, and I would be willing to argue that many of those in the punk subculture are Ragebound or know several Ragebound, and this is because to be punk is to rebel against wider societal views. You'll find many queer people in the punk subculture, for example, even if they are not Ragebound, because of how wider society views queer people.

Not all punks are Ragebound, and not all Rage is punk (though, much of it is). Rage is also activism. It is organized rallies and protests. It is essays that carefully deconstruct internal biases and point out what is and isn't propaganda. It is not believing what you are told about something because you'd rather get first hand experience or research it yourself than hear it from the mouth of anyone else.

I cannot speak of Gamzee and Kurloz as they are presented in canon, because... their characters were either written very messily or just not written at all. They are both destroyer classes, which tends to skew the understanding of an aspect as well. However, I would think that Gamzee and Kurloz's arcs, if written out with intentions of having them be properly developed as characters, would include becoming aware that their beliefs were built on faulty premises, turning against their cult beliefs, and tearing it down; using Rage to destroy what had (passively or actively) destroyed them.

(I would like to joke that Gamzee and Kurloz had to be written poorly. If they were ever written as a fully realized Bard of Rage or Prince of Rage, Homestuck would have been over the moment they accepted their true aspect and began using it to destroy the Condesce and Lord English. Those two classpects are particularly powerful.)

[aortaobservatory]

I'm curious, in one of your posts you said the way you classpect is very personal, what do you do? What questions do you ask?

In putting my thoughts down to answer your ask, I ended up making a breakthrough in how I classpect.

Previously, the methods I used ended up being quite personal, (which all previous parties involved with my classpecting shenanigans were alright with, since they are my friends whom I've known for a long time,) but I cannot ask for such familiarity from strangers online and I would expect many are not willing to share such personal things with a stranger online either. (On top of that, I am not a therapist, and I am certainly not being paid to listen to a stranger's trauma. Apologies, but no.)

Now, however, I can gauge what a person's classpect might likely be with the authentic answers to six questions, no invasive methods needed. Thank you, truly, for sending this ask.

The process I previously used required personal introspection from the person involved to be shared with me. The process I use now still requires personal introspection, but it is not required to be shared with me; only through the authentic answers to these questions.

It is, essentially, an interrogation with yourself. If the answers are shared with me, I can only point you in the directions I noticed within your answers. It will ultimately be you who decides what fits the most.

As well, you may have noticed I am using the word "authentic" instead of "honest". When analyzing the answers to these questions, I did not just take the answers into account; I also took the way the answer was phrased into account, such as certain words used over others, and how they interpreted what the question was asking within their answers. Even the attitude of the person answering and how they treated the questions with the tone of their answers was something I took into account. It is all a tell of aspect and class; that is why the answers must be authentic. Otherwise, it may obscure the true results.

(One notable example, when testing these questions with a less familiar group chat, a Knight of Void (Actively Skilled with Secrets), whose inverse is Rogue of Light (Passive Giver of Knowledge), sent me essay long paragraph answers to each question asked. Most others sent me one to two word answers and/or one to two sentences.)

Before I get into the questions, here are some notes about aspects and classes I've noticed when classpecting.

Due to the nature of classes, aspect can be obscured or otherwise hard to tell. Those of the active classes (direct relationship with aspect) find it easier to pin down an aspect and class, and those of the passive classes (indirect relationship with aspect) find it more difficult to pin down both an aspect and a class. However, the way classes interact with each other can actually help pin down one's aspect.

Like aspects, each class has its own inverse class as well. These inverse classes, when paired with their aspects, make for an inverse classpect. This inverse classpect is arguably extremely crucial, and it is an angle I've taken for a different perspective when classpecting, as it can provide startlingly meaningful insight. Understanding the push and pull between not only aspects and inverse aspects, but also between classes and inverse classes, has proven to be the most accurate way I've found to determine a classpect.

As a Seer of Heart (Passive Study of Identity), my inverse is Witch of Mind (Actively Embodies Logic). The way I approach this blog and classpecting as a whole is from a very logical standpoint. On the surface level, one wouldn't classify me as a Heart player, but from the angle of an inverse Witch of Mind, it makes more sense. (also, i dont usually type the way i do on this blog when im with my friends, it is literally only when im seriously trying to study something. buuut i do tend to actively think rationally when faced with A Challenge (typically a social one,,,), so that counts towards it i think. being a system/plural probably has something more to do with that. idk.)

I would advise, if you're having trouble pinning down an aspect for yourself, to narrow it down to aspect-pairs instead of just a single aspect; which inverse of your potential aspects fits you the most? Light-Void, Heart-Mind, Time-Space, Blood-Breath, Life-Doom, Rage-Hope. Eliminating your choices down to two potential aspects instead of one, especially out of a pool of twelve, will typically reap better results. (Unfortunately, this may not work for Sylphs, Maids, Princes, and Bards. Those of those four classes will have to account for their love and hatred/fear of their aspect and its inverse.)

These questions will only truly work if you are willing to be honest with yourself. (They will also only work if you are familiar with all of the aspects and all of the classes to read between the lines and make a proper connection for yourself... I suppose I should post a quick classpecting guide at some point to aid with that.)

What is most important to you?

Why is this important to you?

Why do you do what you do?

What frustrates or upsets you most?

What is in your way? What are your flaws? How do you overcome this?

Are you okay with that?

[aortaobservatory]

Page of Space

A Page of Space has little to no skill in innovation and patience, and can't figure out how to make it work for them. They take the efficiency and goals of others who seem to know what they're doing and attempt to make that work instead; this may or may not work, and often when it doesn't, they don't understand why. This means they can often default to following in the footsteps of others, copying efficient methods and goals that aren't theirs and having no idea how to be varied on their own.

[aortaobservatory]

I need a little help, i have been mostly confused about my classpect since i have described myself as a sylph of heart, but i have been doubting my classpect since people (offical homestuck quiz) has told me im the light aspect

Aspect is the force that is most important in a person's life, whether lacking or abundant, whether good or bad, whether they want it or not.

The official TEZ quiz isn't bad for telling what your aspect is, but I wouldn't necessarily call it good either. If you know how to juxtapose the aspects and classes, it can be a somewhat viable springboard; it classified me, for example, as Mind Prospit, but I am Heart Derse. My class just happens to be Seer, which warped my answers on the quiz to appear as the inverse of what I was. (Seers study their true aspect through the lens of their inverse - I study Heart and Identity via Mind and Rationality. This means I appear to be a Mind Player on a surface level, but my deep desires are aligned with Heart; this is something a simple quiz cannot discern.)

For a lot of the people I have helped classpect (my friends, in private, because the way I classpect is extremely personal), they skipped the quiz entirely. What I found was that it helped the most to look at what their inverse was and see if that fit their experiences as much as the potential true classpect they were looking at.

Here's how I look at it:

If you describe yourself as a Sylph of Heart, your inverse would be Bard of Mind. A Sylph of Heart fulfills the Bard of Mind inverse by passively destroying that which is Mind (Rationality and Logic). Being a pure source of their aspect, a Sylph of Heart is either "scared of" or "sees no need for" what is Rational and Logical. They focus on actively enhancing Identity and Emotion, and thus, passively cause the destruction of Rationality and Logic. A Sylph enhances their aspect so much that they end up completely snuffing out their inverse aspect, which is very similar to what the Bard class does.

But AO, if both are supposed to fit, how do you tell which one you actually are?

Fall back on what an aspect is: Aspect is the force that is most important in a person's life, whether lacking or abundant, whether good or bad, whether they want it or not.

Now examine yourself, and be willing to be honest with yourself too. Which class holds what you struggle with the most?

For Sylphs, their challenge is to learn how to listen to the needs of others instead of assuming they know best, and to balance themselves by learning that it's okay to rely on others for their aspect sometimes.

For Bards, their challenge is to be able to embrace their aspect and not be ruled by its whims, learning to control the way it impacts themselves without letting it be destroyed.

As you can see, despite their similar actions, there is quite a difference in challenge and motivation! Though I will say, these are my class definitions, and class definitions can vary from classpector to classpector. At the very end of it all, only you can decide what fits and what doesn't. I hope I was able to help a little.