The first long criticism that I have completed was quite the enlightening experience. “Speciesism and species being in Do Android Dream of Electric Sheep?”, written by Sherryl Vint introduced to me a perspective on the book that I had not even thought of for a second: the fight for animal rights.
The author makes many extreme points about the book, how the main character is disconnected from nature due to his unhealthy relationship with animals, how the entire human perspective on animals both in the book and real life is unsafe, and how the connections and similarities between the human interpretation of androids and animals ultimately reduces our humanity.
She argues her points very effectively, and often supplements her logic with a Marxist lens (that is again, effectively argued), however I went through the entire paper disagreeing with the core principle upon which she was arguing: animals are worth more than a commodity. Sure, there are pets that humans grow close to, but in the current state of society, humans would be nowhere near as successful as we are if we did not find a way to exploit the other meaty creatures of this world for sustenance and materials, and that stays true in the book too, from what I can tell. After blaming humanity for its loss of humanity, Vint never answered an important question (in my opinion), “What more can we do?”
Ultimately, the read was very informative and well written with legitimate points, I just personally had some qualms with it.