#archthesis

[thebluestblog]

David Deiss - M.Arch ‘17

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Thesis: BIM vs BIM or In the Penal Colony

Thesis Adviser: Perry Kulper

Franz Kafka’s novel “In The Penal Colony” 

Wing - 1

The Arrival - The Harbor

Wing - 2

The Punishment - The Apparatus / The Tomb

 Wing -3 

The Departure - The Harbor

[thebluestblog]

David Deiss - M.Arch ‘17

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Thesis: BIM vs BIM or In the Penal Colony

Thesis Adviser: Perry Kulper

Franz Kafka’s novel “In The Penal Colony”

Axonmetric views based on the narrative sequence of the The Penal Colony 

1) The Harbor

2) The Threshold of Guilt 

3) The Apparatus

4) The Threshold of Doubt

5) The  Tea-house

6)  The Threshold of Justice 

7) The Tomb

[thebluestblog]

David Deiss - M.Arch ‘17

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Thesis: BIM vs BIM or In the Penal Colony 

Thesis Adviser: Perry Kulper 

Drawing is dead, long live the drawing!

Drawing can no longer compete against BIM (Building Information Modeling) at delivering information of a building’s constructability. From now on drawing must relinquish its right over the architecture’s physical qualities and become a critical tool that expresses the theoretical and allegorical qualities of architecture. The thesis - Building Information Modeling VS Being Imaginary Mechanism - attempts to establish a new dialectical relationship between drawing and BIM while it presents a design based on Franz Kafka’s penal colony. Frantz Kafka’s “In the penal colony” establishes a situational structure where the physical and spatial qualities of the design are established through a BIM model, while the narrative and the allegory of the design (and the story) remain in the realm of the drawing. The statement is that the new type of drawing - Being Imaginary Mechanism - is to be a new medium to represent the allegory of a design as opposed to the drawing’s original purpose. Part of the claim is that there is room for both, for BIM and for BIM, and only by establishing the clear roles of each will drawing be saved. The BIM model demonstrates the spatial and physical qualities of the design along with the richness of the data, while the drawing demonstrates the richness of the narrative and other dramatic aspects of the design. Therefore, Building Information Modeling is a concern of the question of HOW, while Being Imaginary Mechanism is a concern of the question of WHY. Thus, this new dialectical relationship shall produce a critically driven design that can exist even without being built. 

Thou shalt draw lines of the wall no more but the lines of the life the building!

[thebluestblog]

Thesis Title:  BIM vs BIM or In the penal Colony Phase: Mid-Term Review Pin-Up Advisor: Perry Kulper Student: David Deiss, M.Arch ‘17

Abstract: The drawing can’t compete against BIM anymore.  It’s a lost game.

Frantz Kafka’s “In the penal colony” establishes the situational structure where the physical and spatial qualities of the design are represented through a BIM model, while the narrative and the allegory of the design remain in the realm of the drawing.

From now on the drawing must no longer be a drawing of the building and its components, but rather a drawing of the allegory of the narrative upon which the design rests.

The Being Imaginary Mechanism is a drawing a parable, detached from building, which unconceals the true nature of the building.

[thebluestblog]

David Deiss - M.Arch ‘17

Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Thesis Adviser: Perry Kulper

BIM vs BIM or In the Penal Colony

A view of the transfiguration path (of the Penal Colony) descending from the Tea-house to the Harbor.