@ MerriamWebster
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@ MerriamWebster
phobias that are autological words
aibohphobia - fear of palindromes
dodecaphobia - fear of the number 12
hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia - fear of long words
self-descriptive
berlin, prenzlauer berg, 2020
Imagine oikawa, kuroo, daichi and terushima singing, "We are number one" from lazy town with kuroo/oikawa as rotten robbie
but every time they say "we are number one” it gets faster
"concept handle" is a concept handle
(from AN #739)
seasons demonstrate their nature / an example haiku does the same
Autonyms
How aptly archaic
Is the word ‘archaic’
To mean antiquated
While itself outdated
Much like the word ‘erudite‘
Which means educated
And is only ever spoken
By the highly literate
Or by those considered ‘magniloquent‘
Now there’s a fancy word!
Which, of course, means pompous
(And it’s probably the most pompous word
That I have ever heard!)
Now, I do hope this poem
Hasn’t been too ‘obfuscatory‘
View On WordPress
Is there a word for the type of word that is... well... when you wonder if there is a more specific word that more correctly captures what you are trying to convey, and you look it up and you find that, yes, there is indeed this more perfect word, but it is too technical, too archaic, too much like a more common word with the opposite meaning that you fear it might cause confusion, or is otherwise too non-understandable for you to actually use, so you find yourself stuck using the earlier, less perfect word for the sake of your reader not accidentally misunderstanding or not needing to pull out a dictionary? A word that is not dead yet, but pretty much functionally extinct? And you are left wishing that this word was a more realistic option, and wondering if maybe you should have used it anyway, perhaps in some vain attempt to resuscitate this dying word, or to, in some small way, increase public awareness of cartography jargon?