MY THOUGHTS ON NICK KNIGHTÂ âFASHION FILMâ.
Fashion film is a medium that hasnât yet been defined. It combines stimulating visuals with experimental sounds to convey a narrative of fashion garments to a defined audience. I think Knight, in his explanations hits the nail on the head in reference to fashion film not being the same as fashion photography. Fashion photography is the art of being able to freeze a moment of something in time to create a stunning flat visual to be consumed on mass. Fashion film as Nick Knight states is about bringing âthe narrative that is already in the clothingâ. Itâs not just about on moment frozen in time, itâs about the telling of a story and exploring the narrative that the designer intended when making the garment in the first place, for the piece to be seen in movement.
Knightâs comments on fashion illustration evolving in to fashion photography and fashion photography evolving in to fashion film seem poignant to me as someone from an illustration background, who enjoys illustrating portraiture and has a heavy interest in fashion illustration. A key point that I think Knight failed to mention when addressing this, is the role that illustration can have (has been having) in the world of fashion film, in a sense that this evolution has come full circle.
I do agree however in that Knight believes that âit is important to allow people to see how things are made, to allow people to see the process.â From the view as a creative less so than a graphic designer/illustrator, I often prefer the problem solving aspects and the journey of making the final piece. I think on occasion this is lost to an audience, but when a piece whatever it may be is executed well, the audience tends to be intrigued more and wonder how the piece was made. Â
One of the most significant things that Knight in my opinion said was âgreat fashion makes a great fashion filmâ. The strength of the fashion is indicative as to the strength of the story that can be told and the range of ideas that can be generated. If the fashion has no sustenance then itâs no longer a fashion film, itâs just a film/video.
In saying this it does lead to the question will the audience now require more from the designer than a flat image in a magazine? If there is a heightened need for the audience to want to see the process and to see design in motion, will videos of catwalks suffice anymore? Ultimately fashion is expression and unlike other mediums, it is for the most part a significant part of an individualâs identity. The way in which that identity is expressed and shown to a wider audience is consistently changing and defining itself, which when it boils down to it, is pretty exciting.


















