Have you ever thought about how the "trips" each group takes kinda says something about the difference in the home situations through out the generations, like the Beach, Camping and Morocco. I've heard people say that generation 3 kids were rich compared to the other seasons, but I think that's mainly because gen 2 showed already broken families and gen 1 showed them kinda falling apart. I'm thinking this was on purpose since gen 3 has far from perfect families but they still stuck together.
Generation 3: Alo and Mini are poor/lower middle class, Rich, Liv, and Franky are middle class, Grace, Nick & Matty are upper middle class/rich.
Broken Families: Matty, Nick, Liv, Mini, Franky (originally).
Generation 2: Naomi, Cook, Thomas, Emily, and Katie are poor/lower middle class. Effy, JJ, Pandora, Freddie are Middle Class/Upper Middle Class.
Broken Families: Cook, Naomi, Effy, Pandora.
Generation 1:
Tony, Sid, Michelle, and Cassie are middle class/upper middle class. Maxxie, Anwar, Chris, are lower middle class/poor. Jal is rich.
Broken Families: Sid, Michelle, Chris, and Jal.
So no. I don't think the trips really show the money situation of the Generation. Because Gen 3 worked over the summer to raise money to go. Then for Generation 3 they had a convenient in with Rider who supplied a place to stay. I don't feel like Generation 3 had the most stable home lives of all the generations either. I think that the writers just wanted them to go some place rather epic. Plus Generation 1 had two trips a school trip to Russia and the beach. So I honestly feel like it was writer's choice oppose to reality based. Each Generation I think has a good mix of strong families and weak families. Poorer families and more affluent as well.
Hope this made sense I am on cold medicine :) I enjoyed figuring this one out. You always have lovely questions.
















