#backsack

[catgirldiick]

hey check out me drawing kobold "boy" maid upskirt during todays ttrpg playtest session of my PC in said ttrpg playtest :3

Sunder Brightline, he/him (for now)

[tamarahtalkstv]

Rate The Bookbag!

I Give It A 10/10!

It Has Me Written All Over It And My Classmates And Teachers Loved It!

🎒

[kill-akara]

need to suck on a girls sack from behind. fucking just shove her onto a bed and go literally nuts

[atlantictrans]

Nabbed from reddit

[tesserariuss]

backsack™

[oxfordcommashirts]

| Backsack |

@oxfordcommashirts

[laveritaswoman]

On backs and sacks and love you’s ...

Shippers love them some S and C fun twitter banter. But never in a thousand lifetimes could we have imagined that S would say those words ... “love you” ... to C in a tweet response where he’s talking about getting his back and sack waxed!?!?! 

S could have said “love you” in any other of his many, many tweets in response to C’s many, many silly birthday tweets to him that day. In all the other tweets except the back and sack one, the “love you” could have been interpreted as a bit of a gushy way to thank a good friend for making his day special. 

But instead ... S decides to choose a porno-ish tweet to C to say “love you,” this tweet technically being the least relevant/appropriate one in which one would make such a proclamation ... unless ... said tweeter is in an intimate relationship with the person he’s tweeting. 

Then to top it all off, S closes this tweet with a “cxx”, which I think was intended to be an “xxx,” but S was “drunk tweeting” (according to C herself), and the c and x keys are right next to each other on the keyboard, so it’s an easy error to make, And as far as I know, xxx means triple-X, as in X-rated, as in porno! Then C likes the post! This is XXX-tremely inappropriate banter for two co-workers. in a platonic relationship. and one has an SO. and the other has a fiance!

So, let’s instead interpret S’s back and sack wax text assuming that C and S are in an intimate relationship, which all indications say they are per the numerous sexting posts like this between the two of them. It almost sounds like S did the waxing for a special someone who prefers her partner’s nether regions smooth for ... whatever ... reasons (and there can be several). The fact that he included “love you” could imply that he did it for C because he loves her as his SO, gf, wifey, partner everyday, and wants to have his man-bits nice and smooth for her to fondle ... or whatever. Many women prefer this of their men, and it is a sweet, considerate thing to do for your SO if it’s their preference.  

Then, let’s explore C’s related tweet to S. She says she’ll be kind and “not post the pic of you getting your’s done ...!!!” followed by the crazy-eyed smiley face emoji with it’s tongue sticking out like an oversexed pervert! Since when does a platonic co-worker have such intimate access as to watch (much less take a pic) of another platonic co-worker getting his back and sack waxed? Uh uh, Felicia! That just does NOT happen! And she didn’t even say “a” pic, she said “the” pic, as in “the pic I already have on my phone of you getting your back and sack waxed!” (C’s tweet was before S’s sack one, but with the crazy-eyed emoji and taking pics innuendo, I don’t think she was talking about “getting his nails done,” as her other picture showed).

Sorry, but platonic co-workers DO NOT talk like this to one another, no matter how “comfortable” said co-workers get with one another’s bodies because they film intimate scenes together (anti psychobabble theory). This intimacy is every shade of crossing the line and disrespectful to their gf and fiance ... unless ... the gf adjacent and fiance are fake and it is S and C who are in an intimate relationship with one another! Now it makes total sense!