Costello, Elizabeth K. et al. 2010.
Today in my Microbiology class I gave a presentation on the paper cited above called 'Postprandial remodeling of the gut microbiota in Burmese pythons'. They were basically looking at the diversity and composition of the microbial communities within the gastrointestinal tract (small and large intestine) after fasting and then for the days post-feeding.
Overall microbes are essential to the host for their ability to break down indigestible food particles. Two of the main groups that are found across previously studied vertebrates such as humans and mice are the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. The prior break down complex polysaccharides (carbohydrates), while the latter break down complex proteins.
They took gut samples from 32 juvenile Burmese pythons and found the mass within the gut at the different time periods, and the diversity/composition of the microbial communities. The first figure above is looking at the Unifrac distance relative to fasted (gray bars) and content mass in grams (black squares) on the Y axis. The X-axis gives the different time periods sampled from. The mass within the gut steadily increases after the python feeds until day 10. The Unifrac distance - the larger the bar the more dissimilar, or more diverse that sample is - increases until about day 3 and maintains a steady high level.
The second figure shows the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in percentages for each time period. Bacteroidetes are dominant during the fasted state, because the only contents are comprised of mucosal glycans, or carbohydrates secreted by the gut lining. This makes sense considering Bacteroidetes are used in breaking down carbohydrates. After the rat (lots of protein) is ingested, the Firmicutes increase at the expense of the Bacteroidetes, as it is their role to break down complex proteins.
Something else they proved in the paper is that this microbial diversity is specific to the python, and isn't delivered via the rodent meal. The third figure shows a series of principle component analyses. These take the two variables that define the maximum difference between the two communites and compare them to find similarity or separation. If the data points from the two sources - the python and rat - are far apart, this means they are dissimilar, and one can say that they are host-specific. Bacteria in general, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes show clear separation between the two. Lactobacillusis commonly found in the gut of rodents, and spikes during day three of digestion in the python. This suggests that the presence ofLactobacilluswithin the python comes from the rodent meal. However, the fact that bacteria overall seem to be host-specific, the rodent is an unlikely source for the diversity of microbes seen within the python gut.
The significance of this paper is that we see the same dominating phyla of microbes within the snake gut that we see in other vertebrates. This is more data that can be contributed to figuring out a 'core' set of microbes conserved across vertebrates, and possible essential for healthy gut functioning.