Whenever I get on Twitter, baseball fans are constantly discussing the importance of catchers and pitch framing (AKA making balls look like strikes). Yes, this is an extremely valuable asset to have in a catcher, but the stats can be somewhat arbitrary and flawed. In fact, many main baseball statistic websites don’t even have framing stats listed.
The reason I am writing this is that I saw multiple White Sox fans arguing about if Tyler Flowers was good or not in his stint with the White Sox. Let’s use him as an example. Flowers was a great pitch framer. There is no arguing that. This year, he is also first in FRAA_ADJ, according to Baseball Prospectus’ stat, incorporating framing runs, blocking runs, and throwing runs. He is also ranked first in framing runs. For reference, he is ahead of Yasmani Grandal, who many baseball writers deem to be one of the best defensive catchers in baseball now. Flowers is also ahead of Buster Posey. However, last year, Flowers was ranked 17th in this FRAA_ADJ and 6th in framing runs, behind Grandal and Posey in both. So you can see that there is some volatility in these stats.
Another example of this volatility is Brian McCann. He was ranked 8th in framing runs in 2017, but now he’s 26th. Does that mean he’s in the bottom 5 of qualifying catchers? No. He’s very valuable, especially if you factor in his bat. One factor of this volatility is that he moved teams, so it could be the worse pitching staff. The Yankees had an impeccable bullpen last year. The Astros (McCann’s current team) has a ‘pen that isn’t as strong as the Chapman, Betances, Miller bullpen that McCann caught for most of last season. It could also be the arbitrarily deemed “Framing chances” that factor into his framing stats, but, either way, this is still a hard skill to gauge but will improve with statcast being more a part of the game.
How much stock should we put in this? We need to pay attention to catchers who can frame. It is a skill that not many have. How does this circle back to the White Sox? Tyler Flowers.
Yes, I’ll admit. He’s a VERY good catcher. Was he a good overall player on the Sox? The short answer is not really. Hindsight is 20/20, so when people say Flowers was good on the Sox, they’re looking at him like the hitter he is now. In 7 seasons with the Sox, he accumulated 4.9 bWAR. Granted, he only played in over 100 games for two of those years, but still, his defense carried his offense through those seasons. His best season, he slashed .239/.295/.356, which is flat out brutal.
I think another reason why Sox fans say Flowers was good is their recency bias. They’re comparing him to the catcher we saw replace him: Alex Avila and Dioner Navarro. Both were two of the worst defensive catchers in the game. Avila could draw walks. That’s about the only benefit that came out of this platoon. I’ll be honest, I was happy when Flowers was gone, but I wanted him replaced with someone BETTER at either catching or hitting. The Sox front office chose neither, and it showed. If the Sox grabbed a better catcher to replace Flowers, I truly believe we wouldn’t have Sox fans complaining about how good Flowers was.
On top of that, Flowers moved to the National League. At this point, this league overall is a little weaker. Both leagues fluctuate. Before the year 2000, the National League was stronger. This happens. This could account for an uptick in Flowers’ stats and the slide we saw in stats from Adam Dunn, Adam LaRoche, and Todd Frazier in their moves to the A.L. from the N.L. I’m not bashing. A different scene also sometimes does a lot for someone. If Flowers had stayed on the South side, people would still be complaining about how bad he is.
Anyway, my point is, pay attention to catching stats. They matter, BUT take them with a grain of salt. There are still some kinks that need to be fixed.
And as far as Tyler Flowers goes, let’s say he was a very bad hitter with a good glove in his stint with our guys. His moved helped him, and he’s seeing success now, but let’s not treat him like he was the pride and joy of the South side.