Hello, I'm sorry if this is a silly question or makes no sense or whatever, but I was wondering if there is evidence for a biological basis to gender identity? I understand that gender roles and how we label ourselves and each other is socially constructed and based on culture, but I'm talking about an innate understanding of oneself (1/many [sorry, don't know actual # right now])
I guess I'm sort of confused about it all, because perhaps if there were no gender roles or the concept itself, perhaps we would just be all individuals with varying personality traits and likes and dislikes, but I also think that there is probably some biology involved with gender identity, because it makes sense that there is a internal "blueprint" of oneself from a very early age, if not from birth.(2/3?)
But, I also don't want to fall into the neurosexism trap because most studies show very slight insignificant differences in brain matter and neurochemistry between men and women, but there are also studies showing that literally gender identity maybe a scatter plot chart/spectrum within the brain that we all fall individually on somewhere. Anyway, this was a really long ask and I'm sorry it was so dense and rambly. (3/definitely 4)
If you know a better blog to ask these questions, please tell me, because I am not sure where to look. Thank you for taking the time to look at this. (4/4 - the end)
I think it’s a valid question because it’s one that has answers that are constantly in flux. Unfortunately I can’t do my usual rooting around for sources because I’m on leave meaning that my database access has been shut down for the semester.
There have been multiple biological “proofs” of the gender binary that have since been debunked (re: genitalia and chromosomes wrt the existence of intersex people) and yes, there is usually some biology involved in informing our sense of gender identity, but ultimately the general consensus from the research I’ve done studying gender in a variety of disciplines including psychology, anthropology, history, biology, theology, and sociology is that there is a distinct possibility that there will be no consensus without further critical study, especially given the hostile sociopolitical climate we’re facing.
Gender is one of those areas where experts of all disciplines are still arguing over where the ratios really stand with nature vs. nurture. Because gender is so intimately ingrained into us from birth and because assumed gender is often so integral to how a person is raised it’s difficult to separate these extremely early social cues and interactions and study gender in a nurture-less void.
It makes sense to think that we have some form of a “blueprint” of ourselves just by virtue of being human beings but especially at very young ages so much of who we are and how we interact with the world is shaped so strongly by what we’re taught to say and do that it’s still something that people find difficult to tackle.
This answer ended up about as dense and rambly so no need to apologize for that oops










