#blmwild

[thebasinandrange]

Nature never ceases to amaze, I love this place! . . . #nevadawater #waterinthehighdesert #publiclands #blmwild #wildnevada

[blmwild]

Some members of Congress want to give public input to the dark side

The recent release of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story isn’t the only thing we may soon have in common with 1983, when Return of the Jedi reigned at the box office. This week, the U.S. House of Representatives is anticipated to vote on a resolution (H. J. Res. 44) that would overturn the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) “Planning 2.0” rule and set land use planning back 34 years — a time when the public was kept in the dark until very late in the process.

Americans are fortunate to own millions of acres of incredible public lands, many of which are overseen by the BLM. We all have a say in how these lands are managed through the ability to participate in a public process to develop land use plans. Last year, the BLM established Planning 2.0, which provides earlier openings for public input in the process. The new rule gives all land users more opportunities to make their voices heard, whether they are recreationists, ranchers, scientists, local governments, or the energy industry.

Planning 2.0 also includes steps to ensure that important fish and wildlife habitats, such as migration corridors and intact habitats, are identified early in the planning process so these important areas can be managed and conserved as the agency makes decisions about development, recreation and other public land uses.

What’s more, members of Congress are using a law called the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to undermine Planning 2.0. Under the CRA, once a regulation is disapproved by Congress, the agency cannot write a new rule that is “substantially the same” unless Congress enacts a new law permitting that. As a result, the BLM would be forced to use outdated guidelines from 1983, delaying the point in the land use planning process when public input is valued.

But we all, as the public, still have a voice in how our lands will be managed in the future. Click here to tell your Representative to vote NO on H. J. Res. 44 — and maybe the ending to this story will be more like Return of the Jedi than Rogue One, with public input living on.

Photo credit: Tony Bynum

[blmwild]

6 Reasons to Protect Northwest California #BLMWild Treasures

The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Arcata and Redding Field Offices in northern California are tasked with caring for about 400,000 acres of public lands in Mendocino, Humboldt, Del Norte, Trinity, Siskiyou, Shasta, Butte, and Tehama counties on behalf of the American people. The BLM is currently seeking public input on how these lands should be managed over the next decade or more. Why we should care about protecting #BLMWild places in the region:

1. These public lands are stepping stones for wildlife and are among the most untouched in the region. The surrounding areas have suffered a long history of logging, mining, road construction and other development activities. In some places, these lands are all that’s left of a watershed.

2. Tucked between National Forest lands and private property, these “wild islands” are treasures to the northern California way of life as important habitat for wildlife, the source of clean drinking water, areas of recreation and places with cultural significance to Native Americans.

3. Connecting Islands of Habitat — These islands of public lands range from approximately 30,000 acres to as little as 40 acres. But the importance of these lands is outsized. They help connect habitat for bald eagles, river otters, salmon and steelhead and many more species of wildlife.

4. Safeguarding Sources of Clean Water — The rivers and streams that originate or run through these public lands contribute to the region’s supply of water for drinking as well as what’s needed for municipal and agricultural use. Protecting these lands is an investment in the area’s water supply. These rivers and streams also provide habitat for salmon and steelhead and their conservation is critical for the region’s fisheries.

5. Experiencing the Outdoors — As the BLM updates their blueprint for the region, we have a chance to conserve sensitive public lands from development and enhance opportunities for people to experience the outdoors. These lands include places that are suitable for recreation activities like hiking, camping, mountain bike riding, horseback riding, kayaking, rafting and canoeing.

6. Recognizing Culturally and Historically Significant Lands — The public lands that will be considered during this process include places that are historically and culturally important for the region’s Native American tribes, including the Cahto, Karuk, Wintun and Yurok nations and the peoples represented by the Round Valley Indian Tribes. Input from these communities will be critical during this process.

If you care about how your public lands are managed, this is your opportunity to make your voice heard! Make your comments by February 3 on the California Wilderness Coalition’s action page, and learn more on our website.

- California Wilderness Coalition

[blmwild]

On Jan. 3, 2017, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) finalized its land use plan for Alaska’s Eastern Interior, a region of vast landscapes and complex river systems spanning 6.5 million acres of some of America’s most remote and beautiful land. Why this milestone is something to celebrate:

A Win for Wildlife: BLM’s plan protects habitat for internationally important fish and other wildlife, including moose, caribou, grizzly bears, wolverines, eagles, and dozens of fish species such as chinook salmon.

A Win for Wild Places: BLM’s plan safeguards millions of acres of incredible public land from the impacts of mining, including wild places in the Steese National Conservation Area, the White Mountains National Recreation Area and the Upper Draanjik River watershed.

A Win for Clean Water and Rivers: BLM’s plan establishes protections for rivers like the Upper Black or Draanjik River, the Wood River and Bull Creek based on comments from tribes, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Gwich’in Tribes, all expressing strong concerns about protecting these important watersheds, water quality on the Yukon Flats, and important subsistence resources.

A Win for Traditional Lands: BLM’s plan protects traditional land of 8 federally recognized Tribes, allowing local Alaska Native communities to sustain their relationship with an environment that has long provided food, water, shelter and cultural resources.

A Win for Public Input: In a draft management plan released in February of 2012, the BLM had identified areas important for conservation — but left those same areas open to development such as mining. In the years following, thousands of advocates sent messages urging BLM to protect areas set aside for conservation from development. Local tribal leaders traveled to Washington, DC to ask BLM leaders to safeguard lands critical to sustaining their communities and culture. And the BLM listened. The agency’s final plan strikes the right balance between development, protection of traditional land uses, and conservation of millions of acres of your public lands.

[thebasinandrange]

Natural rock art in Nevada's high country. . #nevada #homemeansthehills #rockart #highcountry #publiclands #blmwild #nevadawild

[blmwild]

We’re the PUBLIC in public lands 

Our national parks have been called America’s best idea, but they are just one piece of the larger, extraordinary concept of U.S. public lands — millions of acres owned in part by each and every American. From snow-capped mountains to the sagebrush sea, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) oversees over 200 million acres of our shared natural heritage. Forty years ago, Congress passed legislation called the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLMPA), which set the course for how the BLM manages our public lands today.

Most Americans have probably never heard of FLMPA, but it is a law that affects all who love and cherish our BLM wild public lands. Prior to 1976, the lands currently managed by the BLM were not necessarily viewed as America’s crown jewels like the national parks or U.S. Forest Service managed wilderness areas. FLPMA notably included conservation and managing areas for wilderness characteristics as priority uses for BLM public lands, in addition to activities like mining, grazing, energy development, and recreation. Fans of wild places can thank FLPMA for directing the BLM to take inventory of the lands it oversees and determining which areas should be managed for conservation.

In order to decide which uses were of the highest value to specific places managed by the BLM, FLPMA importantly created a process to allow citizens to have a say in how their public lands are managed. Each region is governed by a “Resource Management Plan”, which takes into account how the public — YOU — wants to see these lands managed for the next 20–30 years. Should we protect an area’s wilderness character or allow development for energy or minerals? Should motorized recreation be allowed in an untrammeled area?

WE are the public in public lands, and it is imperative that all of us speak up to ensure the wild places we love stay that way for future generations. It is up to us to attend public meetings, submit written comments, and talk to our local land managers about which areas are important to protect from development and other threats. Go to blm.gov to learn more and get involved with your local BLM Wild partner organization to help safeguard the most important and unspoiled places of the American West.

[blmwild]

Recently conservationists toured the rare desert grasslands of Otero Mesa, New Mexico, called the Serengeti of the Southwest due to its large herds of pronghorn antelope, mule deer, and bighorn sheep.  The Bureau of Land Management - New Mexico is revising its management plan for the area in the coming years, providing a rare opportunity to protect special places across the region. 

Photo: Matt Skroch

[blmwild]

Fun Fact About Your Public Lands!

(h/t New Mexico Wilderness Alliance)

Parks Ranch Cave, managed by the Carlsbad, New Mexico Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Field Office, is the second longest gypsum cave in the U.S. at more than four miles (6.6 km) long!

The longest gypsum cave in the U.S. is the D.C. Jester Cave System in Oklahoma at 6.25 miles (10 km) long.

In the world, Optimisticheskaya in western Ukraine tops them all, with more than 146 miles (236 km) of surveyed passage!

Photo credit BLM New Mexico via Tumblr.