Kim Dokja: *sidles up to yjh* Heyyy-
Yoo Joonghyuk: *murderous glare ready in 0.1863 sec* What.
Kim Dokja: Damn you didn’t even let me get to the best(ie) part :(
for reference:
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Switzerland

seen from Chile

seen from Egypt
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Brazil
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Egypt
seen from Ireland

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
Kim Dokja: *sidles up to yjh* Heyyy-
Yoo Joonghyuk: *murderous glare ready in 0.1863 sec* What.
Kim Dokja: Damn you didn’t even let me get to the best(ie) part :(
for reference:
i feel like its such a case of weird wording to say that that you shouldn't apply morality to a book when you (i think) mean to say that morality should not come from it. thats difference between intrinsic vs extrinsic
like lol yeah i dont think books should provide for moral guidance, unless that is their intended purpose and even then whether they succeed is up in the air, but I do think you apply your morality to how you read them. like it doesnt have to be 'i find it wrong to do x, hence if i see it in a book i would take the same moral stance as in irl' (that CAN happen of course, but not always), but even the simple 'crazy villain does moral wrongdoings and i choose not to care bc its fun, its a book and i can afford for that lack of interest not to matter'
idk, that process to me still feels like applying my morality, insofar i can identify what is WRONG (which is subjective, in the sense that an act might be perceived as NOT wrong by somebody else), and can do as i wish with it, and it is also part of why i enjoy media