In the spring of 2007 will arrive on-air. OnAir is a service that satellite technology to allow passengers to wireless devices like mobile phones, Internet connections from computers and Blackberries used to use during a flight. The debate on the use of wireless technology in flight has to happen for years, and now it goes, the debate should up.First all the heat, you should know that the first wave of this can not be in U.S. flights happened. Airbus, the aircraft manufacturer that is the creation of this technology sold, it AirFrance. AirFrance is expected that the service for passengers in the spring of 2007. Whether passengers have to pay for the service, as it is not to pay for headphones for a film yet known. Two other airlines, the British airline bmi and TAP Air are both considered, with OnAir, but nothing is finalized, yet.So what turns the debate is all about? Who would not kill the convenience of using their mobile phone during a long flight, and more important e-mails on their Blackberry or the luxury of surfing the Internet at the time? Apparently many people and for some very valid reasons for the rejection as security ConsiderationThere been a constant concern that the use of mobile phones (cell phones for us as Americans) and other devices that could use the wireless technology interfere with the level of navigation equipment . Recent technological advances in both equipment and navigation mobile phone technology seems to negate that concern, but not everyone is convinced. It is feared that the navigational equipment can be mobile affected.The DebateOkay on older machines, take up the issue of safety is taken care of and there are no concerns that wireless communication technology will interfere with the plane of navigation devices. What objection is there to the use of cell phones during a flight? Surveys have shown that the majority of air travelers against the use of mobile phones on board an aircraft, because it would be downright annoying to sit next to someone who is receiving and making calls for hours on a flight. They are laid between two incessant spokesman. Common sense would tell you, have ruthlessly to hour long conversations on their mobile phone during a flight, that people not be so real. But experience has shown us when it comes to cell phones, most people lose their common sense. People will keep loud personal conversations in restaurants and grocery stores and on the buses. Take a mobile phone also countries in which they were obtained illegally. So someone really believe that people use common sense and consideration for air travel? Not 's really.It easy to see the scenario. Business, get the respect what you are calling to be a very important business and at the end talk more than they do consider expected. Or a mother who wants to just check on their children for a minute at the end to chat with each one of them before they can hang. It is no wonder that passengers are concerned that the use of mobile phones a nuisance during the flight. If you are already a nuisance on the ground. Another concern some have air travelers is the tension that create all this trouble, maybe even nervous flyer makes more frustrated and pushed her over the edge. Some people are nervous already just below. Add sits on a narrow, crowded airplane to the mix, the constant threat of terrorism, the restrictions, which may be exercised, and now the addition of a ruthless mobile phone users the right of the nervous flyer, and someone just child's play. ; What are Internet connection travelers not so strictly against the use of Internet connections for computers and PDAs such as BlackBerrys?. These units are quiet. Many passengers already use their laptop computer on a flight, it is not connected to the Internet when they use it. The ability to send and receive e-mails that, it could be useful on a flight, most people, especially business travelers. It does not seem much of a debate should be as long as the safety of these devices is not concern.What can be done? When should you start to be confronted with this issue? As of now, U.S. carriers do not seem to be considering, like with OnAir or service. A report on Yahoo Travel, said that the airlines that they demand - AirTran, Spirit and U.S. Airways - all said they have heard tell their passengers, they do not want cell phones used in aircraft and against the addition of services. But the question is whether these services do start in Europe and prove to be a bonanza for the carriers that use it, the carriers are jumping on board? In a time of shrinking profits, they will be able to resist? So, if the study that proves what AirFrance OnAir to be successful and the carrier to jump on board will be done to ensure is possible that cell phone use is not a problem on board? One solution is no cell phone use have time. Perhaps next to the small light above your seat that you know if you secured your seat belt or not, there might know a different light that you, whether it's the right time to unload your cell phone or not must be allowed to enable. Time could be handy on long flights and on flights that do overnight, when most people would sleep.Another solution is to make the crew the opportunity to voice feature is restricted to limited devices during off times. During this time SMS and e-mail would be allowed to speak, but would be disabled.
