Not specifically a Jewish hot take, but in response to the anti-circumcision one:
Comparing penile circumcision as done in Judaism to FGM is ludicrously misogynistic and serves to compare a very safe procedure (which is presently also very common among non-Jews in many countries for unrelated reasons and is recommended as a treatment or preventative to certain conditions) to something which causes permanent damage and often leads to infections and lifelong difficulty and pain with urination, sex, menstruation, and birth. The two are simply not comparable in how they affect people, even when you take everything else out of the picture. You can't make this comparison without downplaying (or even mocking) the suffering that FGM causes. Then again, I feel like that's probably what OP was trying to do.
And LOL at calling circumcision an "extreme body modification." Idk if OP just knows nothing whatsoever about body modification, but extreme body modification usually means stuff like subdermal horn implants or rib removal.
.












