WikiLeaks revelations. And this is a week old.
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Jamaica

seen from Brazil

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
WikiLeaks revelations. And this is a week old.
As usual, many of those running around righteously condemning WikiLeaks for the potential, prospective, unintentional harm to innocents caused by this leak will have nothing to say about these actual, deliberate acts of wanton slaughter by the U.S. The accidental release of these unredacted cables will receive far more attention and more outrage than the extreme, deliberate wrongdoing these cables expose. That’s because many of those condemning WikiLeaks care nothing about harm to civilians as long as it’s done by the U.S. government and military; indeed, such acts are endemic to the American wars they routinely cheer on. What they actually hate is transparency and exposure of wrongdoing by their government; “risk to civilians” is just the pretext for attacking those, such as WikiLeaks, who bring that about.
Facts and myths in the WikiLeaks/Guardian saga | Glenn Greenwald
[...] That said, there’s little doubt that release of all these documents in unredacted form poses real risk to some of the individuals identified in them, and that is truly lamentable. But it is just as true that WikiLeaks easily remains an important force for good. The acts of deliberate evil committed by the world’s most powerful factions which it has exposed vastly outweigh the mistakes which this still-young and pioneering organization has made. And the harm caused by corrupt, excessive secrecy easily outweighs the harm caused by unauthorized, inadvisable leaks.