Boyds
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from Germany
Boyds
tried to explain the plot of ravenous (1999) to my friend the other day and boiled it down to “Ives is just chasing Boyd around screaming ‘MATCH MY FREAK!! PLEASE!!’ and Boyd is just yelling ‘NO!!’ before jumping off of cliffs” and honestly I think that that’s an accurate summary
me and my obscure homoerotic horror-western-dark comedy movie (ravenous 1999 by antonia bird) against the world
why does that moment when ives and boyd are staring at each other all bloody remind me of that moment when will and hannibal are staring at each other all bloody
and in both cases they fall to the ground after in a homoerotic embrace oh well well well
There are so many things I love about Ravenous, and I could talk about all of them. But that’s a lot of typing so I’m just going to focus on one thing:
Part of what makes Boyd’s ending in the bear trap so great is that he never explains himself. Of course he can’t, he’s half dead, that would be impossible. But I do recognize, throughout the second half of the movie, he wants to feel understood. He’s constantly scapegoated for the murders of his traveling party by other people, and he wants people to understand that he is not the monster, Ives is. And this is why Boyd is easy to identify with as a character: we have all had a situation where we were misinterpreted, leading to us feeling isolated and lost. No matter how large or small of an event it is, it always feels frustrating. We want Boyd to explain himself, to be believed, to have someone have his back.
However, if this happened, and people believed Boyd, especially a character like Martha, it would not work thematically. Martha has no reason to trust him: in fact, it’s Boyd trying to explain himself that first establishes this distrust. He says he didn’t kill her brother, but really, why should she believe that about him? He already admitted to eating people. Any person in Martha’s shoes, especially an indigenous woman who has seen both the curse and the corrupting force of colonial power first hand, would be suspicious.
So, Boyd doesn’t need to explain himself. He doesn’t need to die feeling like Martha understands he’s the “good guy”. He can just die knowing that sacrificing himself was the right thing to do, even if it is never recognized as sacrifice. And that’s a beautiful thing. Because the whole story is Boyd balancing these two motivations within him: self preservation and morality. This bear trap scenario of “eat or die” is the ultimate choice, and he chooses morality! With no benefit to himself other than feeling like he still has a soul as he is drifting off to his death! And that can mean something for us, something for people: if you’d rather explain that you’re a good person than do the right thing, you should rethink your priorities!!
God, I love this movie so much.
I watched Ravenous (1999) for the first time about a week ago and now I need EVERYONE to go watch it
Trust me. Trust me you'll enjoy the homoerotic, comedy, horror movie about cannibals that critiques american imperialism........ which is also very camp.
Carnivore, animal, I am a cannibal
I eat boys up, you better run
RAVENOUS (1999) dir. Antonia Bird