Branded Trash
Iteration #3: Academic Studies Climate Action & Visual Culture, University Of Huddersfield - UK, 2020

seen from China
seen from Philippines
seen from France

seen from Argentina
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands
seen from Finland
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Italy

seen from Germany
Branded Trash
Iteration #3: Academic Studies Climate Action & Visual Culture, University Of Huddersfield - UK, 2020
faux naïf
This Was Tomorrow – Reimagined
3rd press - very limited run - the UTOPIA edition -
I'm very happy to share the third edition of This Was Tomorrow—a new, limited version of the book originally available at RIBA Bookshop and the London Review Bookshop.
This Was Tomorrow // Statement
My practice begins with the idea that art can’t exist on its own, cut off from the world. It’s tied to everything—our struggles, our society, our politics.
Art is political, or it’s nothing. Just decoration, extra fluff—and we’ve got enough of that already.
This Was Tomorrow isn’t about nostalgia or embellishing the past. It reflects on a time when dreams were big, not for gain but for communities. These houses, while often cold and flawed, succeeded in creating spaces where people could belong—places that fostered security, connection, and a sense of togetherness. The failure wasn’t in their design or materials but in the systems that neglected them.
Support structures—maintenance, funding, belief—crumbled as quick solutions overtook the deeper vision of building communities. The concrete didn’t fail; what failed was the collective commitment to those bold ideals.
Inspired by the 1956 exhibition This is Tomorrow at Whitechapel Gallery, this project echoes its spirit. The original exhibition brought together figures like Alison and Peter Smithson, Nigel Henderson, Eduardo Paolozzi, and Erno Goldfinger—united in imagining a shared future shaped by art and architecture.
This Was Tomorrow began as a book with Judith Martin, exploring the legacy of postwar modernism.
Now, this exhibition expands that dialogue, urging us to reflect: What are we building? For whom?
Accompanying the exhibition, opening 18 Jan 2025 at Museu Quinta de Santiago in Porto // @museuquintadesantiago, is a video exploring these ideas. Using Tim Rodenbröker-inspired techniques // @tim_rodenbroeker, I processed original images in Processing // @processingorg, reassembling them in a stop-motion style and editing them back together.
This blend of deconstruction and reconstruction mirrors the hopes and contradictions of the past and present.
This project isn’t just about looking back. It’s a challenge to the present, to believe in something better.
Do we still dare to dream?
One frame and two halves Photo scan of Efke film, masked with a page from The Guardian. Srebrenica, 2004 / London, 2024
This work begins with a 35mm film strip I shot in Srebrenica in 2004—nine years after the massacre. The town was still visibly wounded. Bullet holes in walls, silence in the air. It felt like a place suspended in time.
The exhibition’s theme was cinema as a space for community. But I kept thinking: what happens when that space is gone? Not just metaphorically, but physically—absent, destroyed. What replaces it? Where do people come together to make sense of what happened, or to believe that it even did?
This strip isn’t presented as a composed photograph. It’s the raw film—unfolded, uncleaned. Flares, hairs, scratches. No attempt at perfection. I paired it with pages from The Guardian, dated 27 April. A record layered on a record. A trace of presence layered over a trace of history.
There’s something about that combination—film and print—that still holds weight. Or maybe held weight. Today, we see tragedies unfold in real time—streamed, posted, reshared. And yet somehow, we don’t believe them. Or we forget. The more we see, the less it registers. The texture of reality thins out.
That’s what I’m really interested in here: not just memory, but the very possibility of believing what we see.
This image—this strip—is a document, but also a question. A question about truth, mediation, and the spaces we’ve lost, physically and culturally, to gather and believe together. If this had been made today—would we trust it? Would we even think it happened?