Rewatching DD cos I have tasked myself with retelling the whole mess in snarky textpost form (which is, imo, the best way to experience this story). And I noticed another parallel with the main show that I think is pretty telling. Again, it's probably completely accidental since Daryl's spinoff bares v little resemblance to the flagship show and his character/arc in particular. But the scene in the jail, when he and Isabelle are captured and conversing, sitting on the floor with a partition between them closely resembles a scene during the Reaper arc with Leah. In that scene, there is chain link between Daryl and his previous love interest/woodland hook-up/loner gf/canine co-parent. Daryl is the only one jailed, altho he believes at least, that Leah is equally trapped by Pope's regime and seeks to save her from it. The vibe of the two scenes is similarly despondent. The major difference is that the OG show seems to understand that, while joining a paramilitary cult may be somewhat understandable given the desperate state of the world, it does very much put you on the wrong side. Despite her initial relationship with Daryl, Leah is reconfigured in s11 as a baddie, someone who, for whatever reason, chose the wrong side, chose a destructive path. Isabelle is NOT, however, perceived as a baddie or even someone who was cruelly manipulated into choosing the wrong side/path. Isabelle is a true believer. An angelic figure. A religious warrior who challenges our hero to believe. But believe in what?
"The Walking Dead" takes a balanced, complex, human approach to religion, touching on, if not fully exploring why, when the world crumbles, some people find comfort in it and some use it as a tool of power and control. Why some cling to it desperately and some abandon all faith and belief. The OG show doesn't take a stance either way on whether God exists or religion is a force for good or evil. It merely depicts how human beings respond, how their beliefs can fail or warp under the pressure of global change and disaster. (Pertinent theme, no?) Such themes are mostly explored through Father Gabriel, but also via other groups (the Termites and Wolves etc) and characters (e.g. Carol). On the other hand, "Daryl Dixon" starts from a less balanced, more conventional place. We are supposed to simply accept that yes, God does exist, religion is good and believing in a child Messiah is a romantic cause....uuuuntil it's not. At which point, we start to differentiate between the good believers and the murderous nutjobs. Unfortunately, there were a whole lot of good believers -- Isabelle included -- who enabled the murderous nutjobs for upwards of a decade. But we don't have time to deal with that reality...during two ponderously slow seasons....
Neither the Reaper arc nor the first two seasons of "Daryl Dixon" manage to accurately, intricately or intelligently depict actual cult dynamics, which are far more sinister and screwy. The Reaper arc is too rushed and everything in DD is over-romanticised. (It's i-fucking-ronic how adverse they are to a Caryl romance because literally everything else is romanticised: the clothes, the city, the countryside, food, music, religion, cars, bikes, the past. The whole endeavour is sickly sweet but heaven forbid Daryl and Carol share a romantic moment after 85 years of yearning). "Daryl Dixon" had the time and space to properly depict a religious cult and how it functions, how it twists people and ideas, how it might flourish in an apocalypse, but it understood such beliefs as legitimate, rather than problematic. The show gave them credence, even as they abused a child. Isabelle was martyred rather than in any way held to account for her role in abusing her nephew. (Yes, it's true, a pretty, blonde, soft-spoken woman can get caught up in an ideological system that leads her to participate in heinous abuse! Other shows have understood and even depicted as much right here in the C21st!).
Anyway, I've already written about how Daryl's spinoff romanticises religious abuse rather than critiquing it. The point of this post is to say that Leah and Isabelle were both active members of a violent, insular high-control religious group. But one is seen as a baddie and therefore no longer a viable love interest for our fave hero and the franchise's best boy. The other is seen as a glorious goodie and completely deserving of Daryl's love, loyalty and admiration. Not only that, she's seen as someone he should listen to, someone to challenge his lack of faith, to expand his worldview. When Daryl meets the Pope he is very clear that he is a non-believer. And this is a v Daryl moment, similar to, tho not on par with, him telling Negan he is Daryl. When Daryl tells people who he is, we as an audience generally respond: yeah that's our boy. He is who he is and we like him that way. The only way Daryl is able to survive the Reapers is to pretend to be someone else. Much like Carol does. Or Eugene with the Saviours (?). Pretense is not Daryl's strong suit. It could be argued that his pretense in this arc is OOC...or maybe it's just under-explored. What we see him do tho, in order to fit in with that cult, in order to survive, is take off his angel-wing vest (important visual cue!) and reluctantly assume the role of an abuser, a physical and psychological torturer. We see elements of Merle, elements of his father come out in him, as well as other arseholes we have known (Negan). This tells us that Daryl knows exactly who these guys are. They are NOT the good guys. And they are NOT the guys HE wants to be. They are the type of men he has been actively avoiding turning into since season 2. The difference in how Leah and Isabelle are viewed by the two shows is just another inconsistency between the two worlds. As is the difference in how Daryl responds to these highly controlled, highly explosive cultic environments. The Daryl we know on the OG show recognises bad guys instinctively, he knows abusers and knows how to survive them. He does what needs to be done, he tries to save who he can, but he does not buy into their bs. That's what makes him our Daryl. The Daryl of the spinoff doesn't exactly like Losang, but nor do we get him eyeing him like the manipulative bully he is. The Daryl of the spinoff questions Isabelle's deifying of her nephew but he doesn't recognise it as child abuse and nor does the show. The Daryl of the spinoff wavers in who he is and what he believes and where he belongs. And while that may be understandable in a foreign context, there needs to be enough Daryl left that we can recognise him thru his wishy-washy mid-life crisis of faith/identity. For that to happen tho, they need to look back at who Daryl has been, who he has become, and how he responds to different people/dynamics that are so clearly dangerous. The shows also need to share some kind of similar ethical stance. At its core, TWD is about power and control, who rises up in a power vacuum and what they do with that power. How they treat people. How they view the world. TWD makes noises about everybody being the good guys but, in fact, it's very clear in the OG show what is and isn't an acceptable use of power. "Daryl Dixon" doesn't seem to have the same ethical conviction. It bathes psychological manipulation and spiritual exploitation in soft light, in romantic language. It's critique of religious doctrine used for power and control is weak and watered down, if it can be said to exist at all. And right now, is NOT a great time to be underplaying how religion can be weaponised during a worldwide crisis.










