The Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill, originally shelved due to international pressure after a gay rights activist, David Kato, was hammered to death in his home, has now been updated and although the death penalty has been removed the bill is still viewed by the wider international community as a human rights issue.
This is the full 2009 bill
Homosexuality in Uganda is already illegal, punishable by death, and what the bill was intending to do was to make it illegal to know about a homosexual, or about someone practicing homosexuality, and not tell an authority.
Whilst living there for three months, LBGT rights were, for me and during my experience, a non-issue. Watching the Call Me Kichu documentary it struck me how complex respect and tolerance appears to have become.
· Homosexuality according to the radical Christian groups is 'non-African' and 'unnatural' and condemned by the bible..
· Homosexuality according to a lot of Nationals, religious or otherwise, is threatening and scary, in part, thanks to bias news coverage, stigma and the supposed minority of homosexuals where a lot don't realise they live, work and pray alongside 'dangerous gays'...
· Homosexuality according to Parliament is opposed by the population and thus, in a democracy, such wishes much be relfected through parliament...
· Homosexuality according to homosexuals is a natural part of being, something 'discovered' and unchangeable...
So how do all these views come together?
· Radical Christian groups preach hatred and intolerance whilst being 'true' to their values.
· Nationals read the papers, stick by their views and obey the law which states that homosexuality is illegal
· Parliament reflect the wishes of the citizens
· Homosexuals feel, and continue to be marginalised, for something they perceive to be beyond their control and would just like to be free from the threat of death based on their partner preference.
Who is right? Which structure of regulation is the one to determine Uganda's model of right or wrong? National law was halted from being passed with international pressure with reference to International Human Rights yet those engaging in homosexuality are, rightly or wrongly, breaking national law.
Does International Human Rights Law surpass all?