More specifically the fallacy of relativity and begging the question. I often see statistics that look pretty good on graphs and seem true, but they are never cited or backed by a professional that has done an extensive study on the topic. Fallacies are wide spread on this website and people will make a bull shit graph and statistics in anger and frustration. For example, a graph that claimed the effects of eating meat on the planet, the "statistics" had no citation. YOU CAN'T POST THESE THINGS, NO CITATION MEANS NO FACTS. I will now show how to cite and make your opinion VALID GMOs are not bad for humans or the environment, in fact, they are very healthy for humans and the environment here are the facts from a UC Berkeley professor: http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2012/06/06/why-labeling-of-gmos-is-actually-bad-for-people-and-the-environment/comment-page-2/ Now, if you are going cite a website, here are some basic rules: 1) WIKIs (what I know is) DO NOT COUNT AS A CITATION 2) Be very careful with ".com"s, make sure they're backed by research 3) be very careful about using a ".org" they are automatically bias, PETA rarely counts as a source and finally 4) if you REALLY want to be taken seriously, do your own extensive research or use a ".edu"
