"Also seeing woman as a class and men as the oppressing class is very flowed" everything you had to say about this is completely incorrect. Are you male? Saying that men don't oppress women as a class is just plain ignorance. It's called a patriarchy for a reason and your linked article didn't prove your point at all.
I am a trans men and this is taken out of context or knowingly misunderstood. Their are several sections to ones ideantity and how one faces oppression it is not as simple as men oppress woman.
The example I gave was white woman oppressing poc men, white woman have more societal power over poc men. Proof: https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/news/jimcrow/brute/homepage.htm
https://time.com/5857023/karen-meme-history-meaning/
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ899418.pdf
I suggest looking up the term white woman's tears
Another would be bourgeoisie woman over working class men. Proof:
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2012/08/27/yes-the-rich-are-different/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901394/
Classim creates a social higher archy from socioeconomy and woman how are in a higher socioeconomy class than men have power over them just like they have power over woman how belong to a lower class
The article I linked was how modern academia analysis power structers in society with intersectional analysis. The fact that instead of going "Societal power structers are complex" you thought I said men don't opress woman is really something. Their are several levels to power. One is not automatically more powerful over the other because their in an oppressed class in one of these levels.