#comparative jurisprudence

[backpackpolymath]

Quorum, Power, and the Bending of the Law, Part 2: The Doctrine, the Distortion, and the Deal Behind the Drama.

Series: Quorum, Power, and the Bending of the Law The Great Philippine Senate Teleserye of 2026 A Comprehensive Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, Crossdisciplinary, and Normative Transdisciplinary Analysis ◄ Part 1: The Session, the Senators, and the Teleserye They All Scripted  |  Part 2: The Doctrine, the Distortion, and the Deal Behind the Drama One Senate Session. Seven Disciplines. One…

Quorum, Power, and the Bending of the Law, Part 2: The Doctrine, the Distortion, and the Deal Behind the Drama.

[nessuxq027-blog]

Mistake in Contract: A Study in Comparative Jurisprudence (Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, V. 23, No. 2,)

Mistake in Contract: A Study in Comparative Jurisprudence (Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, V. 23, No. 2,) McKeag, Edwin C. Mistake in Contract: A Study in Comparative Jurisprudence. New York: Columbia University Press, 1905. 132 pp. Reprint available 2003 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. LCCN 2002072856. ISBN 1-58477-276-X. Cloth. $60. In contract law there are two types of mistake as determined by Savigny. The first, echt, represents those cases in which consent exists, but the contract is impeachable due to the determination of mistake. This work examines the second class of mistake in contract, unecht, "...in which real consent is lacking, resulting in the nullity of the contract, while the mistake is an accompanying feature" (Preface). This class of mistake is traced from Roman law to common law and modern civil law. Originally published as Volume XXIII, Number 2 in Columbia's series, Studies in History, Economics and Public Law. Būу thё thìnɡ У0u ωаnt!е! Hìɡh pёrformаncё wìth l0ω сost!