Jan 20, 2023
Do these unicycles infringe either of these design patents? The judge ruled (incorrectly, in my view) that they might in this summary judgment order.
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Germany
seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Martinique
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
Do these unicycles infringe either of these design patents? The judge ruled (incorrectly, in my view) that they might in this summary judgment order.
Does this glass infringe this design patent? That’s the claim in this recently-filed complaint.
This might be a good time for a reminder that design patents protect the way things look, not how they work.
Does this shoe buckle infringe this design patent? That’s the claim in this recently-filed complaint.
Do these pool floats infringe these design patents? Those are some of the claims in this recently-filed complaint. You may recognized one of these design patents from two--highly meritorious--declaratory-judgment actions filed against this patent owner (prior blog posts here and here). This patent owner seems to be a serial victim of what I call the concept fallacy.
Do these headlights infringe this design patent? That’s the claim in this recently-filed complaint.
Does this semi infringe these design patents? Those are the claims in this recently-filed complaint.
Does this leg-shaving device infringe this design patent for a "Contoured Electric Head Shaver"? That’s the claim in this recently-filed complaint.
Do these fishing rod holders infringe this design patent? That’s the claim that prompted this declaratory judgment complaint.
(Side note: This appears to be yet another example of the concept fallacy.)