Looking at Constance's supports, I can see some lolcalisations being just pointless fluff, while some are just, uh...
"Karen, let's erase the most likely reason why she's short on arcane crystal, I mean, who cares about it, right?"
JP!Constance is a bit more coy about the something "passed down from her great progenitor", when Pat's Constance just mentions her line, but not her special "bloodline".
Aka, it's harmless fluff that was lolcalised away in her Billy support, but compare it with her Ferdie one?
No "leading the Empire" bcs what is even the fuck?? Young!Ferdie always wanted to become PM and challenge the Emperor, he never wanted to lead Adrestia at all??
Pat's Constance asks him to "tread carefully", aka, she's pissed and agressive, something JP!Constance, at least from the lines, isn't (I'll check the line delivery later on).
And that last line from Ferdie???
"I'm a glad you emerged from the wreckage of your house"??? When the JP!Version just has him say "tragedy" befell House Nuvelle and "a future I can hardly bear to mention".
It changes the flow of the convo, Constance isn't pissed because Ferdie is sugarcoating/disminishing what she endured, she's pissed because he pretends he can relate to what she felt during that time!
Ferdie isn't surprised at Constance being "brusque", but wonders why she's angry! And yes, what she is pissed about is how he pretends to understand her feelings, as she is someone who lost "everything".
Given how the previous line was lolcalised away, we continue on the "lolcalised!Ferdie apologises for, uh, remembering her about what she lost" instead of "Ferdie apologises for trying to put himself in her shoes".
Sunk cost fallacy or, as we say in french "quand le vin est tiré, il faut le boire", the lolcalisation continues on the "she's pissed bcs he's reminding her of what happened" instead of Ferdie's "fake" empathy.
But, and more interesting, Nobles BaD means the mention about Constance wanting to regain "nobility" was swapped by "restoring my house and reclaiming my title". Given how Hanneman and Ferdie talk about nobility being something else than "wow fraud, you're not like other nobles you know how to climb o trees !!!" I'd say it's an improvment.
Indeed, Constance used to "discuss" the pride or the values of "nobility" with a young Ferdie back then, making "sparks fly in high society"!
It's not just "Ferdie was a boy who embodied the finest nobility at balls, while I was just watching I guess".
"Susan, he can't have such a low esteem after all he was raised as noble and thus cannot self-reflect! Let's have him nearly do it, but add "perhaps" just in case!"
JP!Ferdie accepts and acknowledges he had been a fool.
"His house is in shambles so he has nothing, his followers are chopped liver because he is a noble and doesn't care about non noble people!"
Next to nothing isn't nothing, and he mentions his followers in the orignal version!
"Susan, we must erase the mention of him having been beaten down! Otherwise the players might believe the sudden even that happened 5 years ago had negative effects on playable characters!"
"Reach the heights of our forebears, or dare I say, even higher" is something cooked here by the lolcalisation, JP!Ferdie only mentions they can work together and help/support/motivate each other, which is what Constance focuses on, instead of the "higher than my predecessors" part.
So, all in all, why was that support chain so lolcalised?
From the reason of Constance's ire to Ferdie's fate during the TS, to ultimately, their shared goals?
I can hazard a guess, it was to write Constance as an arrogant and prideful brat and Ferdie shares some of her traits, as they strive to "prove themselves" to be "better", aka, have more "muhrit" than their forefathers, instead of focusing on working together and supporting each other through their, during the war, common hardships... because Nobility BaD and that had to be hammered in a game that is set in a traditional fantasy setting with a heavy emphasis on the "noblesse oblige" concept ??












