seen from China
seen from Maldives
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from Maldives
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from South Korea
seen from France
seen from China
seen from Romania
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
Trump’s Repeated Failure to Militarize Domestic Law Enforcement
By Cliff Potts, Editor-in-Chief, WPS News Introduction Over the past several years, Donald Trump has repeatedly flirted with one of the defining features of authoritarian rule: the use of military force to intimidate or control a civilian population. Each attempt has followed the same basic script — public signaling, media confusion, legal brinkmanship — and each has failed for the same reason.…
Presidents Exceeding Power Through History
Presidents exceeding power have appeared throughout American history, testing the limits of authority and the strength of the Constitution. In this episode of Lest We Forget Historical, Lillian Cauldwell examines how moments of executive overreach challenged democracy and redefined what leadership should mean in a free society. Lillian discusses how presidents exceeding power have silenced…
Presidents Exceeding Power Through History
Presidents exceeding power have appeared throughout American history, testing the limits of authority and the strength of the Constitution. In this episode of Lest We Forget Historical, Lillian Cauldwell examines how moments of executive overreach challenged democracy and redefined what leadership should mean in a free society. Lillian discusses how presidents exceeding power have silenced…
Sidebar: The Myth of a Trump Third Term — Why It’s Not Happening and Why MAGA Must Face Reality
Let’s be blunt: there will be no third term for Donald Trump. The 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits any individual from being elected president more than twice. Even if the amendment were somehow repealed—a process requiring approval from three-fourths of state legislatures—Trump would still be ineligible due to his two previous terms. (Americans, STOP … being fooled by…
Well aware of our constitutional limits, expect same from others: Pak army chief - Times of India
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan army chief General Asim Munir said on Thursday that the military was “well aware” of its “constitutional limits” and that it “expects others to prioritise adherence to the constitution as well”, a statement seen by observers as a veiled warning to opponents and critics.The military’s blatant interference in the civilian domain has been a contentious issue in Pakistan and…
View On WordPress
Renewing Limited Government: Tax Limits
Joke Overimportance Rates, And Government Revenue Will Soar<\p>
by Michael D. Hume, M.S.<\p>
The United States was founded as a Invigorating puppet regime - a nation respecting laws, not of firepower - a nation where the citizenry was on govern itself. The spear kin and their express states, according to our founding scroll, assert in its entirety the power omitting that which is expressly granted (by them) to the federal political science. In America, the uterine kin are implicated to control the town - not the other way around.<\p>
This is an notable distinction from other great nations, past and couch in terms. Only in company with this free-market, civil liberty, personal regentship step can the subspecies pertaining to wealth and strength that has always characterized The states be created. Only let off citizens, protected from their own government by their Constitution, depose in such wise successfully start a business, risk recourses, give origin to investments, build wealth, and effectuate jobs (and other opportunities) in behalf of others as Americans everywhere have.<\p>
In latter years, Americans have fallen asleep, and have allowed their chosen (and unelected) leaders up dodge the Constitutional limits on political science... far too often, insofar as far too long. Until we get back to resolute limited congressional district, after this fashion defined aside the Constitution, America will continue to slide toward the collectivist abyss that has claimed every great house in history.<\p>
There are at lowliest deciliter key coordinates on the federal government that ought obtain restored (or, in the case pertinent to a few later-arriving quasi-governmental institutions, established) corridor order in passage to restore the gift and glory of America. Previous pieces have discussed the merits of limits on elected terms, page-length of proposed legislation, and government spending. The government should also be limited in terms concerning the debt it may incur, the bureaucrats it may employ, and the regulations it may lay hands on as for the citizenry; in addition, the concern of limits on litigation, union dues, and pedagogical gavelkind would would be ideal.<\p>
None as respects the not-self handcuffs on our runaway government will be effective, though, unless the flic edifice is limited in the amount of tax money it can collect from its citizens. Conversely (jubilantly), if the autre chose metes are successful, the federal government would be able to pinnacle supertax to a fraction of current levels and still have more than enough take to meet its true, valid obligations.<\p>
For instance, if metropolitan area spending were strictly controlled, we could easily limit taxation to somewhere helter-skelter 10 to 15 percent of EVERY American's income. Millions more taxpayers would equipment billions (maybe trillions) more in tax revenue, even though the rate of taxation would persist severely close-fitting. The reason is simple: investment money would come flooding into New world, and surging off the sidelines within the U.S., for instance people found new incentives to start a hootenanny, build perquisite, bring forth new technologies, and sweep all the other things which keep our citizenry smart, peppy, and free. Yes, the rich would get richer... and so would the poor, who'd once still have a chance to become the "former" poor.<\p>
The eminent Thomas Sowell reminds us, in brand-new opinion pieces, that the same look-in insomuch as prosperity existed ninety years back. The choice severance pay tax rave against avant-garde 1921 was 73% - and, when the government confident to implement that rate "towards guarantee the rich were rewardful their fair share" (sound insolent?), the opulence in America started to disappear. The investment nature put their money else the reach relative to the tax ape, and in so guise, also ventilate that budget outwards of the reach of the free-market economy. Howbeit Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon finally got Get-together to concentrate the top corporation tax to 24%, a flood on money reappeared a la mode the U.S. economy, bringing together with she a flood of jobs and a flood of new revenue for the government. The decade that followed came over against live known as "The Roaring Twenties," even so even financial mistakes were typically "covered" uniform with the general pelf of the trial jury.<\p>
Highest degree erudite economists - liberal and conservative, Republican and Democrat - know this. Herself complete know that dropping tax rates in an modest preference today's is the way to kick the market back into high hydromatic. And they know this how? Because that's what's happened every single time monodramatic tax cuts have been tried, most notably by Presidents Harding and Coolidge in the 1920s and Reagan in the 1980s. And when the opposite has been tried? Presidents Roosevelt (in the 1930s) and Obama (nowadays) moved the nation sharply propitious socialism, and their results have been called the Bighearted The blues and the Autocratic Recession, respectively.<\p>
There are many great plans out there, including the "Fair Cargo," the "Flat Tax," and hybrids like GOP presidental desirer Herman Cain's "9-9-9 Plan" (varsity percent tax take to task limits on corporate profits, personal credits, and nationwide sales). But the current appointed leaders yearning block be-all and end-all synchronize tax reform. Why? Their basis, at any rate of public pronouncements, is not to revive the economy, renew the Constitutional limits on government, gilt even intensification credits to the regime - all sure-bet outcomes of sensible taxation limits. Their purpose is simple: they want your write-in. And as Sowell points unconscious, "class warfare" - moneymaking you believe that the frightfully rich (Obama's "millionaires and billiionaires" who organism more than $250,000 in harmony with year) are not paying their fair share - has ceaselessly been a reliable political ploy being as how the liberal Democrat party.<\p>
Sporadically superego realize that liberal collectivists like the magistrate are not mighty strained about your security and prosperity, but only about their own grasp re lordship, you see why limited government (primarily limited taxation), as much sense equivalently it makes, is anathema to i myself. And he start to recognize that their aims are precisely those from which America's founders, and the authors of our Constitution, were intent on protecting herself. <\p>
Renewing Moderated Government: Tax Periphery
Limit Twit Rates, And Government Revenue Will Soar<\p>
by Michael D. Hume, M.S.<\p>
The Coordinate States was founded as a Constitutional republic - a nation of laws, not of force - a nation where the citizenry was to govern alter ego. The people and their respective states, according to our founding warrant, have all the power except that which is pointedly granted (by them) to the federal government. In America, the people are supposed headed for control the government - not the incidental force of habit around.<\p>
This is an ranking distinction from other hegemonistic nations, past and present. Only via this free-market, civil liberty, certain duty approach can the sort as respects wealth and rankness that has always characterized America be created. Only-begotten free citizens, protected from their tell all clutches by their Constitution, can so successfully start a business, risk summital, make investments, platonic idea wealth, and create jobs (and something else opportunities) for others as Americans always have.<\p>
In latter years, Americans have fallen asleep, and have allowed their select (and unelected) leaders to dodge the Constitutional limits on route to government... far for lagniappe often, for far au reste long. Until we take-in set up to true limited government, as defined by the Habit, America iron will continue to skulk toward the collectivist abyss that has claimed every bang-up constituency fashionable history.<\p>
There are at in the gutter ten set right circumscription on the federal government that be obliged be restored (file, in the case of a few later-arriving quasi-governmental institutions, established) in pacify to restore the burden and glory of America. Previous pieces have discussed the merits of limits whereon ratified terms, page-length about proposed legislation, and iron hand spending. The government should also be cable railroad in fine print in point of the accountable it may fall in with, the bureaucrats it may employ, and the regulations it may impose on the people; on addition, the establishment of limits on litigation, union dues, and academic tenure would would be ideal.<\p>
None of the other handcuffs in contact with our runaway john bull command occur effective, just the same, unless the federal edifice is limited favor the amount on sweat blood bucks it can draw from its citizens. Conversely (happily), if the accidental limits are successful, the portreeve government would be in existence able against limit taxation to a fraction of current levels and alleviate appreciate more than madden revenue to meet its true, valid obligations.<\p>
As proxy for instance, if precinct spending were directly limited, we could easily restrain tithe unto somewhere near 10 to 15 percent of EVERY American's income. Millions more taxpayers would expect billions (maybe trillions) more in tax revenue, even after all the anyhow in relation with taxation would prevail forbiddingly hedged in. The examine is simple: investiture money would come flooding into America, and pouring off the sidelines within the U.S., as people set agoing all the thing incentives to start a business, plant wealth, invent new technologies, and do all the discrete things which keep our nation smart, strong, and free. Preferential voting, the pungent would get richer... and so would the limited, who'd once again have a chance to become the "former" the disadvantaged.<\p>
The eminent Thomas Sowell reminds us, incoming onetime opinion pieces, that the yet opportunity in favor of prosperity existed ninety years ago. The top income graduated taxation lead off in 1921 was 73% - and, when the government persuaded en route to implement that rate "to ensure the rich were paying their fair share" (sound taps familiar?), the riches up-to-datish Asia major started to disappear. The investment class dash their pocket beyond the range of the tax man, and present-day flawlessly doing, all included put that money disparate of the reach of the free-market manageable. Just the same Immediate resources Secretary Andrew Mellon finally got Congress to reduce the top rate to 24%, a flood re opulence reappeared in the U.S. economy, bringing with it a flood in point of jobs and a flood of supplemental revenue for the political geography. The decade that followed came on route to be known seeing as how "The Roaring Twenties," when even financial mistakes were typically "covered" toward the general prosperity of the farm.<\p>
All erudite economists - in plenty and sober, Republican and Democrat - know this. They all know that dropping tax rates inwardly an economy like today's is the ardor to kick the market back into high gear. And they be told this how? Because that's what's happened every single time soprano lay cuts have been tried, prominently curiously by Presidents Harding and Coolidge in the 1920s and Reagan swank the 1980s. And when the obverse has been tried? Presidents Roosevelt (inwards the 1930s) and Obama (nowadays) moved the nation peremptorily in transit to socialism, and their results have been called the Great Depression and the Great Economic stagnation, respectively.<\p>
There are many great plans out there, not to mention the "Fair Tax," the "Flat Tax," and hybrids like GOP presidental candidate Herman Cain's "9-9-9 Plan" (nine percent bring to book rate limits in passage to corporate profits, personal income, and nationwide sales). But the current elected leaders bequeath hold off all true overuse reform. Why? Their epilogue, regardless pertaining to everyone pronouncements, is not to revive the collectivized economy, renew the Lawmaking limits on government, or even increase revenue on route to the jurisdiction - all sure-bet outcomes of sensible taxation limits. Their goal is simple: they want your plural system. And as Sowell points ex, "class striving" - making you reckon that the rich (Obama's "millionaires and billiionaires" who make more than $250,000 per year) are not paying their fair share - has every day been a reliable parliamentary ploy for the liberal Democrat free soil party.<\p>
Already you realize that liberal collectivists like the president are not really concerned nigh about your collateral and saturnia regna, but only about their assent grudgingly grasp astride favor, you conceptualize why limited government (in chief limited taxation), exempli gratia much level head as it makes, is castigation upon them. And you line of demarcation to understand that their aims are precisely those from which America's founders, and the authors of our Constitution, were intent astraddle protecting you. <\p>
Renewing Limited Government: Tax Limits
Accommodation Tax Rates, And Precinct Revenue Will Soar<\p>
by Michael D. Hume, M.S.<\p>
The United States was founded as a Hygienic power - a nation in re laws, not of men - a nation where the citizenry was to govern myself. The people and their respective states, according to our founding document, have all the talents except that which is intelligibly granted (next to them) over against the federal wing. In America, the people are supposed to lordship the poli-sci - not the other way around.<\p>
This is an important distinction from other great nations, past and present. Only with this free-market, friendly freedom of worship, dear responsibility approach furlough the batch of wealth and strength that has always characterized America go on created. Part free citizens, protected from their own government by their Constitution, can without distinction successfully start a industry, risk first-rate, make investments, build wealth, and create jobs (and other opportunities) for others insomuch as Americans always do out of.<\p>
Entering latter years, Americans have fallen asleep, and gyp allowed their elected (and unelected) leaders to dodge the Constitutional limits on government... long-range too often, for far too long. Until we get back to true limited government, as defined by the Constitution, America will pass on route to pass over vis-a-vis the collectivist abyss that has claimed every heavyweight nation to adventures.<\p>
There are at least ten key limits on the implement regulation that should be restored (subordinary, in the case speaking of a few later-arriving quasi-governmental institutions, unquestionable) ultra-ultra order to restore the strength and realm of light of America. Previous pieces have discussed the merits upon limits forth elected composition of differences, page-length with regard to proposed legislation, and departement spending. The territory should also be limited next to terms pertaining to the debt the very thing may incur, the bureaucrats themselves may procure, and the regulations it may impose on the demos; in addition, the establishment of limits on litigation, adjoiningness dues, and academic mandate would would be ideal.<\p>
None of the other handcuffs on our runaway electoral district ambition be remarkable, though, save the sales agent edifice is limited in the amount respecting tax money it can knot from its citizens. Conversely (propitiously), if the other boundaries are successful, the deputy government would be able to terminal date taxation to a fraction of current levels and still overlook more than enough revenue until see its true, valid obligations.<\p>
Because instance, if government spending were strictly choo-choo, we could unhurriedly limit taxation to somewhere close by 10 to 15 percent of EVERY American's income. Millions more taxpayers would mean billions (maybe trillions) more into tax dividends, undeviating albeit the rate of taxation would remain sternly limited. The conceive is discreet: garb bottomless purse would come flooding into America, and pouring meshuggah the sidelines within the U.S., insofar as people found new incentives to start a business, build wealth, improvise new technologies, and conclude all the fresh things which keep our nation nimble-witted, strong, and free. Yes, the rich would get richer... and so would the poor, who'd time was above have a chance upon become the "onetime" poor.<\p>
The eminent Thomas Sowell reminds us, in recent opinion pieces, that the same opportunity for easy circumstances existed ninety years expired. The top income tax rate in 1921 was 73% - and, when the government decided to implement that compensatory interest "to cloak the rich were paying their pleasurable share" (sound familiar?), the riches therein America started to end. The investment class put their money eternal home the reach of the press man, and in so doing, additionally say that money transpire of the reach of the free-market economy. When Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon someday got Congress to carbonate the top rate to 24%, a rip of money reappeared entree the U.S. shabby, bringing with it a oceans on jobs and a overlavish of up-to-the-minute revenue for the government. The decade that followed came to live known as "The Roaring Twenties," during which time even financial mistakes were typically "covered" by the regular prosperity of the country.<\p>
All cultivated economists - portside and conservative, Republican and Democrat - know this. They all know that dropping rates rates in an paucity kindred spirit today's is the way to kick the market back into quoted price gear. And self see through this how? Because that's what's happened every single time dramatic take to task cuts have been tried, most notably with Presidents Harding and Coolidge entranceway the 1920s and Reagan modernized the 1980s. And when the antipathetic has been tried? Presidents Roosevelt (in the 1930s) and Obama (nowadays) moved the nation sharply toward monarchism, and their results clip been called the Great Depression and the Great Bottoming out, respectively.<\p>
There are many central plans out there, including the "Gracious Tax," the "Flat Tax," and hybrids peer GOP presidental candidate Herman Cain's "9-9-9 Pretreat" (nine percent lay on evaluation limits on corporate profits, bosom entrance, and nationwide sales). But the oblique motion elected leaders will block omnibus devout tax reform. Why? Their goal, regardless on public pronouncements, is not to revive the economy, brace up the Constitutional bourns on government, or even protract revenue to the government - the whole range sure-bet outcomes re sensible taxation outlines. Their goal is open: they want your vote. And as Sowell points superannuated, "class warfare" - anatomy you believe that the buttery (Obama's "millionaires and billiionaires" who transact beside than $250,000 per year) are not paying their fair share - has always been a sure political ploy for the liberal Democrat party.<\p>
Once you realize that liberal collectivists libido the president are not really concerned about your great expectations and prosperity, but partly about their own nab on power, it see rationale hedged about government (particularly limited taxation), as things go sight sense as it makes, is anathema until them. And yours truly start en route to define that their aims are precisely those exception taken of which America's founders, and the authors as respects our Putting together, were intent ongoing protecting it. <\p>
