Now that I work at a high performance computing center I can submit Mathematica notebooks to the cluster.

#dc comics#dc#batman#bruce wayne#batfamily#batfam#dick grayson#dc fanart#tim drake


seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Barbados

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from China

seen from China
seen from China
Now that I work at a high performance computing center I can submit Mathematica notebooks to the cluster.
Point charge potential on hexagons.
Confidence Intervals
Our N-body simulations show that the innermost planet of the GJ 581 system (planet E) needs to have an eccentricity below .2. Any higher and planets E and B get so close to each other that they can interact and make the system unstable. Last time I posted some chi^2 maps that show where the best fits to the radial velocity data are.
It all boils down to this: The simulations say eccentricity of planet E should be below 0.2 and the radial velocity measurements say an eccentricity of ~ 0.3 best explains the data. How far away from the best fit value can we go before we are being unreasonable?
Using an F-test we can compare different models where the only variation is the eccentricity of E. The F-Test will tell us how likely it is that the models are the same.
This plot tells us that it's about 95% likely that a fit with eccentricity of .3 and .2 are the same.
Systemic Scripting
After some talking with the maintainer of Systemic I got a script to make chi squared maps. What you see is a plot of how the chi squared value changes when you change orbital parameters of planet e.
I was also able to recreate the Eccentricity of E vs Chi^2, Stellar Jitter, and RMS plots in a much less tedious way!
They aren't the easiest to read so I'll repost larger versions as photos.
New set of data where the distribution of eccentricities looks like this:
The most important thing to notice is that E has been allowed to vary over a much larger range to get a better idea of how its eccentricity affects the system.
Since I'm only interested in the the eccentricities of planets B and E, I'll only include the contour plot for those two planets.
Here are the scatter plots:
r^2 = 0.825
r^2 = 0.392
The green line represents the time of a stable run.
Using this data set, it looks like increasing the eccentricity of B tends to make the system more stable but E seems to have the most say.
Interpolating Polynomial
Let's say you have a function that looks something like this:
You can create what's called an interpolating polynomial by picking some points along the curve and make a new curve that has to go through each of the points.
Sometimes the interpolating polynomial is a good approximation and sometimes it's not. Interpolating polynomials aren't limited to two dimensions.
Sometimes the interpolating polynomial is a good approximation and sometimes it's not.
What happens when you try this with images? I don't know yet but this contour plot is pretty cool!
Those aren't ants on a tree stump, they're random samples!