Jack Sprat could eat no fat; his wife could eat no lean. And so, between the two of them, they licked the platter clean.
With my girlfriend and I the meals are not divided (100%,0) or (0,100%). But the same concept applies: I'll have 25% of her beer and she'll have 25% of mine. The nursery rhyme stands in for the general idea of a general convex combination -- any such combination as (53%, 47%), (1%, 99%), or (25%, 75%).
That's what a convex combination is.
It's written with a λ and looks so much more mystifying that way:
But just say that A and B are two things, like in the case above, two 4-D vectors each containing (amount of Guinness I have; amount of Guinness she has; amount of Old Rasputin I have; amount of Old Rasputin she has). The quantity
mustn't total up to more beers than we bought ... which is common sense, really.
So if the definition makes sense, let me just throw out a few mind-expanding ideas you can conceive with it:
Mixing colours is a convex combination. (R, G, B) is a linear 3-space. So is (H, S, V) -- and too, there is a reversible transformation from one to the other. (C,M,Y,K) is a 4-space so the transformation can't be so simple.
Can you then say that one colour is "between" two others?
Can you imagine a colour that's a convex combination of three colours? Would that make sense?
On from colours to ideas. Have you ever noticed that if people are taught two competing theories in a class, then they try to balance between them? I noticed this in political theory, anthropology, and philosophy classes.
The Economist's Which MBA ranking allows you to adjust the importance of various factors. Typical college ranking systems do the following: (1) observe and score schools on several facts, (2) combine these (independent or not) dimensions into a total order (3) using the weighted-average method. The weightings are arbitrary, which mean the ranking would be different for someone with different priorities. If I assume your preference weighting is linear then .
I have a pet theory that it's very natural for people to want to compromise among the ideas that they're given -- i.e., occupy some convex combination rather than a "corner".
My pet theory goes further to say that revolutionary ideas don't necessarily have to be "orthogonal" -- don't have to be completely radical and unintelligible according to current ideas -- to permit novel thought.
If the idea has even just a little bit of a unique notion (points just a wee bit into a new dimension), then that idea can be combined, linearly, with old ideas, and the entire dimension of new ideas is opened up.
Lastly, science. You can have a convex combination of quantum states. That's where the concept of superposition comes from.
From a geometrical perspective, convex combinations happen on the surface of a high-dimensional sphere, restricted to the positive "octant" i.e. all angles between [0°,90°].