Dislikes: Cold Temperatures, Nighttime, Dark Color Palettes, Bitter Foods, Artist’s Block, Being Unable to Help, Arguments, Thunderstorms
Kintypes: Swan Therian, Dollkin
Fun Fact / Trivia: Silvana enjoys taking naps.
Personality Traits/Description: Sugar Swan is soft-hearted, bringing a patient attitude wherever she can. It prefers to solve conflicts with words, wanting to dissolve arguments before they can start. Anastasia is ready to help someone in trouble, whether it’s being a shoulder to lean on or an advice-giver for a struggle.
Source / Headmate Relations: Zhe is careful to not overstep the boundaries of other headmates, and will often ask politely if they’d prefer to let her front for a while, especially if they are seeming to have a tough time.
HEYYYY BOOYYYYY!!!!!!!!✨🎀 It’s Doodles’ CrackHead Anon👁️👄👁️ I’m here to make ya feel better🫵😎 but I’m not comfortable with real hugs(not very slay of me😔💅✨❌) but for you 🫵👁️👄👁️. Give me a hand hug if your comfortable with it boy pop🎀✨🤲
I’ll infect every single blog even if it’s the last thing I do✨🎀
HELLOOO!!
Sorry I'm answering this so late hshhd
I hope you're doing alright! Welcome to my bloggg, it's barren and sad with a few pictures of Adler and Warren Kole taped to the walls 🥲
The crackhead decided to slide into your inbox one more time, and with a very off topic question.
What are nations eating habits like?
Like i imagine nations like England or Prussia go for extended periods without eating properly before remembering how hungry they were, then proceeding to stuff their faces
Hello Crackhead!
Eating habits vary from person to person as they do with us mere mortals, but you're damn right about England and Prussia. They're both ridiculous workaholics, stupidly focused once they get going and honestly time either runs away from them (most often the reason for Prussia) or the thing that they're doing needs doing and they won't stop until it's done (usually England)
Prussia will stuff his face afterwards and then collapse happily somewhere, but England won't. When this happens, which is still far too often, he usually goes past the point of hungry and then can only bring himself to nibble on something until the next day or have just a quick meal to tide him over
The other difference between them is that Prussia will do this in patches but often, either eating terribly when he's working hard and hyperfocused on what he's doing or because he's got himself into a bad habit cycle. His skipping meals is entirely accidental- usually he doesn't realise he's doing it and once he does he stops. It's more personality based than anything else, he's just a bit skatty
England, however, skips meals intentionally in order to do something else, so his bad habits are a lot harder to break him out of. Usually he won't stop until the thing is done and the stressor is gone, or until he's collapsed somewhere and deeply suffering the consequences of working too hard. His personality is stubborn, control freak idiot and until he's satisfied with something he can't and won't let anyone help him finish and will not look after himself at the expense of what he needs to do
after having been thrown into the void for a bit, the crackhead from your walls has taken up residence once more and has thoughts.
So as nations have done a lot of shit, but would they ever do stuff on behalf of their government, like assassinations, poisonings, torture (if it was like a long ass time ago).
Would certain nations be more willing to do these things than others.
on a lighter note, who would fall asleep on the sofa after not sleeping for a week and wake up with the shittest back imaginable
You ask such good questions, Crackhead Anon, I welcome you within my walls and hope you enjoy your stay
I think yes, and no. It depends on the nation, who's asking them, and what they're being asked to do. England being asked to attack Spanish ships in the 1500's/1600's wouldn't have been too much of a task outside his own personality and wishes- it would benefit the English ships trying to venture out to sea, would bring in money for the crown, and Arthur himself would have validation to be an arrogant cunt to Antonio and could enjoy it gleefully. It doesn't really feel like he's been told or forced to do anything.
Similarly, France being asked to glide about court and pick up gossip and dob someone in the shit would have been aligned with what he would have been doing anyway and works with his skillset, but would only work if Francis saw reason to. If the person was someone he himself disliked or thought was working against the nation of France's interests, then potentially. If Francis was asked to dig out information by cosying up to someone and then betraying them, he wouldn't if he either A: approved of them beforehand or B: their intentions for trying to do whatever it was they were doing were ones he too believed in. If a King asked him to find evidence for 'X' person and what that person was actually doing was trying to benefit something that would aid the French nation in the long run, Francis wouldn't or would lie about what he found, depending on who asked him.
Assassinations are a bit different. They're far more a step into physically having a hand in what's going on so it again depends on who's asking and the target. Prussia being asked to take down someone threatening a politician that Gilbert believes is intrinsic to his nation's future? Nope. But Gilbert being asked, or believing himself, that someone's death will bring about a great benefit, or being alive will being about disaster? Maybe, but likely still no. Again, it's more involved with history that I like to see these characters working within their world. For me they're there to watch and observe and assassinations in any way are quite pointed and direct, a very clear cause and effect that steps outside of their usual gentle wheedling or influential push.
It's one thing to encourage a decision or give advice for what they believe is best, and it is quite another to directly take history into their hands and warp it according to a human's, or even their own, wishes.
Torture is even more outside this. They may be old and may have seen and done a lot of terrible, brutal things, but their purpose is to represent and protect their people. To have a hand in torturing their own is distasteful for one, but these immortal creatures all still themselves people. The role they have doesn't incline them to be apathetic or enjoy human struggling, they don't like causing pain to the humans that they are only alive because of. They exist from a shared belief in them and so, as much hurt as they have done or caused, it's usually nameless and faceless, a life amongst the crowds in the name of war or need, not something unnecessary.
To torture someone not of their nation too is in the same vein- what's the point? What would America -Alfred- personally gain by torturing a human? Better to be done by another human to equal the balance if it is deemed needed, rather than be carried out by something that is technically higher up the food chain and stronger. Like us torturing an animal, I suppose- one is certainly more helpless than the other.
All of these ideals vary from nation to nation, they all have different opinions and some lean more one way than others but overall they really don't like taking direct control for things they believe need to play out naturally. As individuals as well, their main gripe is that they don't like being tasked by humanity to become involved in humanity. Giving something that is larger and more powerful than you are is a task in and of itself for one thing- most would find it degrading and disrespectful.
(On your last question pf who would fall asleep on tbe sofa and get a bad back, of all the characters I write for this would be Scotland and Canada. Scotland because he's now older and stiffer, Canada because he's so damned long)
