is it this model that sucks because someone at instantpot are snivelling eavesdroppers* who were like haha let's make her experience worse because we invaded her privacy
this should go to the supreme court
*i conveyed to someone once questioning why instantpot existed when it's just an outdated** rice cooker with more buttons and less functional in design***.
have you heard of the brand cuckoo rice cookers? they're actually the best pressure cookers in the industry.
CUCKOO rice cookers feature advanced tech like programmable settings, heating pressure, double pressure, and automatic warming. Get yours to
oh, I know
cuckoo must be under some oppressive contract or licensing thing (not exactly agreement) that prevents them from selling their products as multi-use in the marketing.
because someone made it prohibitively expensive to sell their own product.
**omg, do not question me; it came with instructions on how to replace an o-ring.
***the design of a rice (pressure) cooker being that it senses the pressure of the contents and stops cooking, and needs to cook delicate grains of rice to fluffiness, ergo, just push the button if you want it more cooked....
just phogeezer. contents at this point for recommended cooking temp and times, geez.
so i ended up steaming it in the rice cooker.
i was so surprised by how big this was that i ended up including it.
oh, interesting: the ratio of the design of all the cuckoo products are such that you can put them all on the product page together and they look like the same petite size until you see it against something else. the above cuckoo cooker is the western model, very old-fashioned technology. not the one i think of when I hear rice cooker.
water is necessary to create steam pressure to cook. btw.
maybe mimics korean stone pots and lids from the stone age. see: dolsot
also: (food) dolsot bibimbap
edited to add: i see that the design of this instantpot model was so outdated it made me question whether this was an implement of psychological torture,
