seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Spain
seen from China
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from Türkiye
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States
seen from United States
A Fistful of Dollars (1964)
Hudson Williams meet-and-greet at Gold House’s Lunar New Year Celebration, featuring Eva Chen, Bach Mai, Prabal Gurung, Yerin Ha, Kim Shui and Daniel Martin (via evachen212) - Feb 12 2026
MegaFraud's REAL Paris Photo 😬
Comments:
off topic but: that pic makes it look like her face is melting. teehee!!! Terrible pic of her and she deserves it.
That photo omg 😱
She looks like hell in that pic.
Wow, she is a very unattractive woman. I’ve always considered her plain, but some recent moments and pictures are just shocking in their ugliness. Take away the bad makeup and I would legitimately think this was a man. Same with her horrendous Harper’s Bazaar photoshoot.
That was the moist glistening make up that Daniel gave her and made her appear like a reanimated corpse. He then bragged about and she’s ghosted him ever since. “Death warmed up” is not a great look.
She looks like she's dying of some terminal illness in this pic. Wtf
There's that one when she is standing next to a fan, is just as sad. Think that is the one after ozempic.
She looks like she is 60 in that photo
Her features are all wonky, like fillers are accentuating the bad plastic surgery results
The video of her at the fashion show she sure didn't look like this.
Filters?
No, just bad lighting. It was said she loves soft focus lenses, good lighting, and photoshop for anything she does. Every now and then the real face pops up like a Halloween mask.
The Catherine Denueve quote comes to mind, something like, after forty having to choose between your @ss and your face. Meghan did not choose her face.
Her colouring is so bad. Her face is so gaunt--Ozempic, I suppose, but there is no fat to soften her features. Not aging well at all. Probably in peri-menopause now, and that can be hell on any woman. And why does she look different in every photo? I don't get it.
Damn, Markle actually went out looking like that? She looks hideously bad. Whatever attractiveness she once had is gone.
Same. I’m just starting to clue in on it with Harry, and he’s a self-admitted user. His appearance on Colbert was shocking. In a studio with a ton of lighting, his pupils should’ve been pinpricks, yet they look like this. They always seem to be blown in his public appearances of the last few years. At least in my opinion.
It’s the first time I could see why people suspect she abuses substances. I’m kinda drug blind usually but there she looks like someone who uses heavily. The hollowed out eye area. Maybe the no makeup look shows too much.
That’s easily one of the worst pics I’ve ever seen of her, and that was very recently in Paris. Really highlights the receding hairline and all the procedures and fillers 🤡
Nah. The one where a fan took her photo and the protruding worm was present was far worse.
Instead of Ocean Eyes, Megs has got those Elmo Eyes
She really loaded up to go to Paris and thought she would break the internet with her beauty and entrance via Darth Vader style, but the only thing she did was elicit laughter.
Her wannabe Angelina Jolie lip filler is atrocious. She is so so basic and unoriginal.
IKR? The smudges under her eyes and general appearance looks as though she's been living rough under a bridge. Both her and the ginger runt usually look as if they both need a good shower with carbolic soap.
This photo should come with a warning she’s seriously scary looking now
Her eyes look just like Charles Manson's. Black, cold and hard.
She looks like Octomom
And her lower lip is stained from red wine. The feature I find most disturbing are her eyes. They're black, with no emotion or life. Just cold, hard evil.
Daniel Martin is sharing the trick that made Meghan's makeup "even more juicy and glowy" at Paris Fashion Week
Daniel Martin
Gillian Keegan, the Education Secretary, to issue guidance after PM ordered a review into relationships, sex and health education lessons
By: Daniel Martin
Published: May 14, 2024
Teachers will have to make clear that gender ideology is a “contested belief” rather than fact if they bring it up in lessons, Gillian Keegan will say later this week.
The Education Secretary is set to issue guidance on Thursday following criticism that some pupils were being taught that there were 72 genders.
Schools will not be told to hold lessons on gender ideology, which states that people can be born the wrong sex and that they can change their identity to the opposite sex or other categories such as non-binary.
But if they do hold lessons on the issue, they must make it clear that it is a contested belief.
In other words, they must say that the “gender-critical” belief that there are just two biological sexes is also valid.
The guidance - which will be out for consultation - will also order schools to show parents all classroom material to ensure they are comfortable with what is being taught.
Rishi Sunak ordered the review into relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) lessons last year in response to claims that content was age-inappropriate, extreme and sexualising.
There were claims that children were being taught about oral sex and how to choke their partners safely.
Miriam Cates, a Tory MP, told the Sun: “For too long activist groups have been pushing a politically motivated agenda on children under the cover of RSHE.
“The Cass Review shows how dangerous it is to let ideology overtake facts. We need compulsory guidance to restore common sense and the rights of parents to know what their children are being taught.”
‘Only age-appropriate content must be provided’
Last year, on a trip to Hiroshima, Mr Sunak said that for the sake of his own children, he wanted to protect Britain’s “precious” pupils by ensuring they only received age-appropriate content in schools.
“First and foremost as a parent... it’s really important that what our kids are exposed to, not just at school but online, is sensitive and age-appropriate,” he said.
“There have been plenty of concerns raised with me. There are too many instances of that not happening. I don’t think that’s right.
“Families up and down the country are concerned about what their children are seeing online and they expect me and the government to put in place protections for that. That’s what we are going to do.”
He added:: “It’s something that really matters to me… What I want is a curriculum that is sensitive and age-appropriate. Our children are precious; they deserve to be protected, sensitively. That’s what I want as a parent first and foremost.”
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The PM ordered a review of the guidance on RSHE teaching in schools, following concerns that inappropriate content was being taught.
“We believe parents have a fundamental right to see materials being used in these lessons and the Education Secretary also made that clear when she wrote to parents in October last year.
“The review… will build on this, making sure that children are always taught sensitive content in an appropriate way.
“However, what I would say is we have been consistent that the idea that someone can have a gender identity different from their sex is a contested political belief that must not be taught as fact in our schools.”
Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at women’s rights charity Sex Matters, said: “Commentary suggests that this guidance will require schools to stop presenting gender ideology as fact and to stop hiding PSHE [personal, social, health and economic education] lessons from parents. If true, these are both excellent developments.
“What Sex Matters wants to see is that schools are told in no uncertain terms to stop giving any credence to evidence-free claims that everyone has a gender identity, or that sex is a spectrum or can be changed.
“These claims are not just nonsense, they are regressive and sexist. They mislead and endanger children, and are a big reason why gender distress has become much more common in recent years.”
danielmartin :
“#aboutlastnight with my OG loves, @nina @marcmena ❤️🔥“
