4 (Possible) Reasons Johnny Depp Lost His Defamation Lawsuit Against the Sun
As we've said before, in the U.S. the defamatory statement had to cause you some type of harm in order for you to seek justice, however, in the U.K. the requirements are even more basic.
The statement in question must identify or refer to the claimant, neither of which happened in #AmberHeard's original op-ed- and although the op-ed was written and published in the United States, the Sun reported on it.
Further more, the Sun reported on an op-ed that did not explicity state Johnny Depp's name- HOWEVER, the op-ed was (and still is) of major public interest of millions around the globe.
Not only was the Sun not privy to the knowledge of (potential) defamation prior to commenting on it (making them unaware and in the clear accoridng to Reg. 19 of the 2002 EC Directive in the UK), BUT they also are protected under the UK defense of #reynoldsprivilege.
Lastly, careful research and responible behavior is rather subjective to the eye of the beholder so the decision to dispense the jury in favor of a judge made that subjective decision the monumental deciding factor and decreased Johnny's odds in having someone see his side.
This situation is the perfect example of why hiring an experienced and knowledgable #defamationlawyer is key.
A RM Warner #defamationattorney will make sure to fight for your right to a fair trial, regardless of the state or country you reside in, and will come prepared with the knowledge of that territory's laws so you're protected no matter the region.
We help clients all over the globe so click the link in the bio to schedule a consultation today!













