"Louis and Lestat are finally gay!" more like tell me you didn't actually read the books without saying you didn't actually read the books lmao
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Peru
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Russia

seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
"Louis and Lestat are finally gay!" more like tell me you didn't actually read the books without saying you didn't actually read the books lmao
THE VAMPIRE LESTAT COVER ALBUM - the legendary Vampire Lestat is back and bigger and badder than ever, this time bringing a whole album of song covers ranging from classic bangers to newer fresh takes on chart hits! get your copy now, complete with a transcript of the artist's commentary on each song!
(songs I think Lestat would cover and release as an album in an attempt to re-kickstart his career and/or make some sort of dramatic statement to Louis. tracklist and "artist commentary" under the cut)
I'm always so bewildered when people write Louis as a total babe in the woods, especially about sex, because like... he's never gone into the ground, he has lived amongst mortals for centuries - it's canon that he lived in the gay quarter of san francisco in the sixties - and you're trying to tell me he doesn't know just as much about the world as any of the others? that he doesn't have a thorough understanding, at least theoretically, of how to bone down with another dude??? please.
writing Lestat is like -
several paragraphs of plot
criticise someone's outfit
think about how attractive Louis is
bad decision
emotional breakdown
detailed description of his own outfit
"preternatural'
several paragraphs of plot
jess i did the greek gods uquiz and this is how I learnt that lestat is a villain. how long have u been posting vc dead disasters stuff cause all I got from that was that he's some kinda antagonistic idiot. this is what i get for engaging w media thru thumblr fandom osmosis
this is so hilarious omg because uhhh... he’s both? like both of those takes are 100% Valid and Accurate, it just depends on which books you’ve read.
IWTV is from Louis’ POV, and when he gives his interview he definitely sees Lestat as the villain of his story, if one that he can’t help but love in a very anguished and deeply embarrassing way. and then the next two books have Lestat as the narrator, and he presents himself very much as a villain, but only so far as villain means “very sexy person who does bad things, but I didn’t CHOOSE to be a monster, and actually I’m deeply sympathetic and you should love me despite it all, oh god, please love me Louis, did I mention I’m very sexy? please focus on that rather than my trauma”
basically in IWTV he’s a romantic byronic villain who gets his tragic comeuppance. and then in the two other books in the trilogy he’s a “ “ villain ” ” who’s just sort of floundering through his own story with zero control or plan, and literally everyone who encounters him thinks he’s an antagonistic idiot lmao. so he’s both, but antagonistic idiot is more fun, so that’s how most people focus on him I think?
a lot of the dissonance in how he’s presented on the sliding scale of “actual villain” to “antagonistic idiot” comes from the fact that for the OG trilogy, AR really leans into the super interesting idea of unreliable narrators exiting within their fictional world working with their own agenda - so the Louis and Lestat of IWTV (Louis’ 10 hour rant on how much both of his ex husbands fucking suck and not in the good way) are quite different to the Louis and Lestat of TVL and QOTD (Lestat’s “Here’s My Tragic Backstory Baby Please Take Me Back” and “The Trauma Conga Line Continues” books respectively) - which means we have to constantly question which author is more reliable, what were their agendas in presenting each other in this way, and even what did Daniel’s poor editor cut from the 10+ hours of tape Daniel sent him from that evening??? was Louis ever really fully in control of his story and what got published about him???? did Louis KNOW his story was going to be published and if so does that change his motivations in telling Daniel his life story??? like did he deliberately present Lestat as a villain to goad him into coming out of hiding and- and I’M GONNA STOP NOW BEFORE I WRITE A WHOLE ESSAY ON THIS BUT IT’S ACTUALLY VERY COOL AS A CONCEPT.
arguably he’s most villainous in the post-trilogy books because he become a totally unchecked power hungry egomaniac rapist monster with no weaknesses who the author refuses to accept is truly reprehensible and nothing like the Real Lestat but we don’t talk about that!!!!
you know what we don't talk about enough? the fact that Lestat rips off his shirt like two minutes into the cow palace concert. on its own it's very entertaining and #classicLestat but what's funnier is that he never mentions putting any more clothes on after that? so as far as we know he goes through most of the performance, the riot, the car chase, the car crash, and the journey back to the mansion WITH NO SHIRT. just... totally tits out.
meanwhile Louis gets dragged through the rioting crowd and squashed in the back seat and trapped in the car as it explodes and Lestat notes later back at the mansion that 'somehow' his clothes are still absolutely fucking immaculate??
disaster bisexual and functional gay.
Lestat sure talks a lot of shit for a guy whose only friends are his mother, his husband, and the teenager he accidentally made his nemesis two hundred years ago
Louis, whenever Lestat talks shit about his wardrobe: