By far the best part of historical research is finding two people who said the same thing 200 years apart and I get to slam the opinions of a rich aristocrat and a tumblr blogger together.
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Yemen

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Thailand
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
By far the best part of historical research is finding two people who said the same thing 200 years apart and I get to slam the opinions of a rich aristocrat and a tumblr blogger together.
I’m rummaging around in archives for photographs of radio use which - while mainly boring - sometimes produces gems like this.
Just three gal pals listening to some tunes.
Oh shit I got my unit results back and I just scraped a high distinction for all my units I have worked so hard having a full time job and being at uni full time simultaneously (and also juggling brain problems and crippling grief) I can't believe it's kind of working and I might manage first class honours after all One semester to go
So the first reading for my Honours group was Heidegger
I would have even accepted Derrida’s garrulous discourse - but HEIDEGGER?
A MAN WHO IS NOT ONLY INCOHERENT IN THE EXTREME, BUT A LITERAL UNAPOLOGETIC N A Z I ?
heiDEGGER
I understand the argument that much is lost in their translation, but his works read like they were translated by a man yelling the original German lectures - from inside a wind turbine - to a Frenchman (on the moon) who is trying to LIPREAD HIM and happens to know only a handful of English words, three of which are variations of the word ‘thing’
I look into the eyes of children - now rendered pure by not having been subjected to Heidegger - and I WEEP FOR WHAT I HAVE LOST
oh truly did folly rode wildly on the tiger of youth - I did not see my pre-Heidegger days for the gift that they were
I HOPE HEIDEGGER IS IN HELL BECAUSE WHEN I DIE I WANT NOTHING MORE THAN TO D E S C E N D AND FIGHT HIM FOR ALL ETERNITY
why am I paying 3 grand for a unit in which the professor exclusively refers to photos as “pix”
god i’m in week one of my masters because apparently a joint bachelor & honours degree isn’t enough to get me out of retail
i’m so sick of academia none of it’s real
ughughughhguh i have to formulate another research proposal as part of my masters
i already wrote a dissertation for my honours i don’t wanna do it agaaaiiin
I’m having such a hard time deciding on my thesis ugh. Help?
1. The history of urban gardening in Australia
PROS: I enjoy it. It’s a less common choice for applicants, so it would stand out from the rest. It’s local aspect might endear me to some kind of job opportunity?
CONS: Could get tired of it quickly. Restrictive in its scope.
2. A social history of the Age of Sail
PROS: Definitely the area of history that I know the most about. Plenty of options for a topic. Probably the era i’m most interested in.
CONS: Not local, would probably have difficulty finding a mentor for it. A topic which is common, not sure what ‘new’ information my research would reveal. Maybe too broad also.
3. Science Fiction’s portrayal or utopias/dystopias and what they reveal
PROS: I know a lot on the topic; I know for a fact that the head of the history department would volunteer to be my mentor. Would get to do a joint honours in english too (very desirable, double the choice in classes)
CONS: Not local, perhaps not practical either. I’m aware that this topic has been covered before, not sure what new thing I could reveal.