#deleted comment

[p-redux]

He deleted the comments after your post. 100% it was about Sam

Well, look at that, he sure did! No more mention of Sam. 👇

Before 👇

And after 👇

Definitely "things that make you go "hmmm"

Here's my original post for reference 👇

P

Looks like Sam and KE met in NY. Dashy does not like him by Bennet Jordan's ig Well, file this under "things that make you go hmm." Anon i

[stuckinapatriarchalbullshitland]

Cara's deleted comment was replied by fans.

@taylorswift just started a very needed fight for her and the artists rights. And I'm here for this

[fragmentsofchaldea]

Sure. Even if this feels like a “big yikes”, I’ll leave a decent response to several points.

Setting aside the malcontent melodramatic tone, your argument would hold more water if you didn’t seem to be purposefully omit larger context of the given situations to form your misleading points.

As one example: Gabrielle having low tolerance in a hostile environment while giving far more ground in Chaldea? Funny how a little selective retention/exclusion can change the overall meaning.

Let’s not even touch how much context you omitted for Delaqua’s place as physically strongest human. Especially considering you seemed to miss the biggest overhead messages that, I felt, didn’t need to be spelled out so blatantly due to how obvious they are. And to think there’s some readers who wonder why I tend to spell most things out and make some future developments very predictable.

Unless you’re omitting or forgetting things. Again.

‘Gratuitous Yuri action’. Right, because the readers got leagues more than just a usual tease compared to previous hereto scenes. Should I even readdress the pattern you’re showing with this claim and that fragment in question? Because the only thing thing this attempted point cemented is that you seemed to have read this Slice of Life mostly to find reasons to be offended while casting aside anything that may dismiss the argument entirely. You also appear to have a tendency to misconstrue phrases/statements, don’t often read between the lines, miss the subtle viewpoint bias of an entry... and apparently read 1.7 million words that only insult you, I guess?

Thanks for the laugh with Gudao being Grand Order Jesus though. As if being mostly average, overly accepting, and at least being respected (for various reasons and degrees) gave him more than just trustworthy master status.

As a final note, you may want to structure your arguments better if you don’t want to sound even more like a straw grasping troll. Because, should you believe it, Gabrielle is often commented as being too much of an OP/center stage master.

P.S. - Never seen MLP, so that likely jab fell flat there, mate.

TLDR for everyone else: Just another suspected troll at best, but at worst someone who is genuinely being serious. Review deleted based not because of the shoddily built arguments, but for the failure to communicate like a socially competent human, which many past actual critics have done just fine. Considering their tone and selective reasoning, I’m sure they’ll be trying to twist this too.

[fragmentsofchaldea]

So you’re a troll then. Noted from here on, and this “review” has also been deleted.

Do seek help.

For those with a bit of morbid curiosity: Part I,  Part II

[arcticdementor]

It was never as acute as my experience in highschool, but college was pretty strict about having to take leftist concepts for granted and it certainly exuded an exclusively leftist cultural pressure. For example, Late Victorian Holocaust was required reading for the whole school. The professor once had us take a day off discussing it so we could all go around and tell her why we thought Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines was so problematic. And in comparison to our expectation to deconstruct Nietzche and his racist attitudes towards black people, we were explicitly told not to critique but merely describe Marx's thoughts in Das Kapital. I remember lightly pushing back on some of de Buevoir's claims in discussion, and the professor responded by making me answer the "female surgeon" paradox in front of everyone, I guess in an attempt to embarrass me (I got it correct without hesitating and he was surprised, so I'm not sure what he expected). Even in my STEM courses we would receive topical asides denouncing congressional Republicans. I had a STEM professor crack a joke that they were glad a recent hurricane tore through Florida because the state votes Republican. We had 2 introductory genetics lectures dedicated to how genetic differences between human populations are impossible, and half a genetics lecture dedicated to how genetics says nothing about transgenderism. This is to say nothing of the administrators' behavior. Posters on racial injustice, recruiting for La Raza, and rape culture were put up by administrative departments for gender and 'multi-cultural centers' all around the campus. We actually did end up having a day each year where all classes were cancelled so we could attend various lectures on white privilege and activism. My campus also unanimously voted to append any accusations of sexual misconduct to student's transcripts so that they couldn't transfer if they were in the process of being railed by a kangaroo court. So again, maybe you're lucky, but the claim this doesn't happen is impossible to square with my experience at all. I genuinely believe that the people who are telling me otherwise are discounting evidence or just blatantly lying for partisan reasons. I've experienced it from so many educators in so many environments and it complies incredibly well with all of the behavior I see reported on elsewhere.

Dysautogenome

[festivalgear]

Slushii Hints At New Skrillex EP “Sooner Than Expected”

Slushii Hints At New Skrillex EP “Sooner Than Expected”

On the internet, nothing is ever really deleted. On reddit, even less so.

In a thread yesterday on /r/Skrillex, populated by some of the foremost authorities on the producer’s music and such, Slushii popped in to drop a bit of a bomb on the users.

Yes, this is Slushii’s real account, and if he’s to be believed, then a new Skrillex EP is coming soon. How soon? We don’t really know. But any time…

View On WordPress

[chartier]

**Update**: Turns out Disqus was having a case of the Mondays, and my comment is still there. I've tweaked my post here but I'm leaving it up since I still think it's neat, and it summarizes my thoughts on Facebook's current kerfuffle quite well. I like Facebook, I think it's a great service—I just think it made a (really) wrong turn. **Original post**: This is a reply I posted to Mashable's piece, which was strangely deleted. My request as to why it was deleted was also deleted, but and since it was fairly lengthy, it bears re-posting here: "The web is a network of information, and information has no walls." Then why are Facebook mail messages still "private?" Why are Facebook chats still "private?" Why aren't their contents laid bare on the News Feed with Like and Share and Comment buttons? Why aren't our phones' SMS conversations automatically uploaded to our Facebook and Twitter and MySpace accounts with "Blog This!" and "Share That!" buttons? When you're in a coffee shop or on a conference floor telling your friend a story about your family's medical problems, or the DUI your significant other just got, or the idea you have for a book or business, why are you speaking under your breath? Why aren't you shouting at the top of your lungs so everyone can hear? Because Facebook simply hasn't found a kool-aid strong enough to trick people into knocking those walls down too. People's concerns over Facebook's frothing desire to murder privacy in the name of advertising revenue are rooted in the same beliefs and constraints as they always have been. It's just that the tools changed. In the "old days," things were written on a piece of paper—your social security card, your medical records, that idea you had for a business—and you could share them with no one, someone, or anyone. You could invite people into your home, but still not share those things with your guests. Even though they're in your home, those things are still private and not for their eyes. But lots of things need to be told or shared with someone, just not everyone. Facebook started as a tool for sharing things with someone, not everyone. Now it's quietly changing all the settings that *used* to protect our information, and unscrewing the locks from the doors that used to protect our private lives shared with someone (not everyone), and inviting the world to stop by while we're out at work. The fact that digital tools allow another person to breach your privacy and trust much easier and faster than ever before is meaningless. It was a problem in the old days, and it's a problem now. It doesn't mean privacy is dead, it's just the same old life lesson that's existed as long as humanity has: there are bad people whom you should not trust. When Facebook adds a new feature or changes its front page layout, it presents alerts, and popups, and static sidebar notifications which you have to click the next eight times you sign in to *actually* get rid of them. New features are shiny and fun and great, just like these new privacy changes that make us all friends and snuggly share-pals. So where were the alerts, and the popups, and the static sidebar notifications (which you have to click the next eight times you sign in) that let users know about this wondrous new privacy change? When you're doing something you love, and you know is great, you proclaim it to the world. It makes you happy, and you know it will make other people happy. When you're doing something wrong, or something for selfish or perhaps even malicious reasons, you don't tell anyone because you know they won't like it. You just do it and hope you don't get caught.