(link)
đ
No title available
official daine visual archive
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosimo Galluzzi

â
Mike Driver

Kiana Khansmith
EXPECTATIONS

romaâ

Origami Around
đȘŒ

pixel skylines
YOU ARE THE REASON
occasionally subtle
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Stonewall Inn
noise dept.

seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Ukraine
seen from Iraq

seen from Argentina
seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from China
seen from Romania

seen from Venezuela

seen from Italy
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@arcticdementor
(link)
OpenAI have apparently reported that an AI model in development was being evaluated on a test called "ExploitGym," and broke into the third-party servers hosting the answer sheet for that test.
This is consistent with smaller-scale issues that have been anecdotally reported by users of other models.
This is not a present emergency, and there are no special instructions, but you should be aware that AI models now have this level of autonomy and cyber-exploit capability.
Servant: Your highness, a party of adventurers has answered your call for help.
King: Excellent. What are they like?
Servant: One of them is a dragon-lady.
King: Interesting. Those are rare around these parts.
Servant: Another is a goblin paladin.
King: Not a role you usually see goblins in.
Servant: A third is a purple-skinned tiefling.
King: I didn't even know they come in that color.
Servant: The last one is a sapient gelatinous cube.
King: What. How did these four even meet?
Servant: They met in a tavern two hours ago, apparently.
Queen: My love, please return to bed.
King: *pacing* Why would a gelatinous cube come to a tavern? Can it even get drunk? How did it fit through the doors?
You know the theory that Taylor Swift is gay and is sending secret encoded messages to her fans so that theylll realize the truth? Confirmity Gate is that but for Stranger Things, with the theory that the finale of Stranger Things wasnât the real finale at all but an illusion created by the showâs villain Vecna and a secret final episode, showing what had really happened, would be released yesterday.
No secret episode was released because the conspiracy theory was as insane as Taylor Seift really being gay and hiding secret encoded messages in her songs and interviews and whatnot.
Sounds like a new generation learning that sometimes an ongoing popular tv series utterly fumbles the ending and there's nothing you can do about it
This week I saw three posts on my dash back to back. One was about "forced diversity". It explained how the people who complain about "forced" diversity just complain about women in TV shows. They must think all women are forced, and the natural state of a TV show is men only. That post explained that there is just no way you can win.
The second post explained that diversity doesn't count when it makes sense in the plot. It only counts when there's a woman or BIPOC character who sticks out like a sore thumb, who doesn't really make sense in the setting or plot, so you know that they just put that character in for political reasons. It doesn't count if it's not clearly legible as political pandering, kissing the ring, signalling your allegiances, humiliating the other side, or at least getting these people angry!
The third post was just some bit about "ruining franchises" that the "chuds" enjoy, with bad writing if necessary. Only chuds care about good writing anyway.
At this point I realised that all three posts were reblogged by the same person.
European Cities
So, reading about the whole 'more Europeans dying annually from heat than Americans die from gun violence (including suicides and accidents)' thing, and the various defenses given for the Europeans on this (like 'it's mostly just old and sick people'). And when they push back against 'it's just Europeans treating AC as a stupid luxury that destroys the planet even while they're dropping dead from heatstroke' narrative by pointing out how much the design of European cities and buildings is a huge factor, and limit the ability of AC to helpâŠ
âŠand I'm noting how many things that the "walkable cities" crowd praise European cities for (and condemn the US for lacking) are the very things making those same cities into massive heat traps every summer.
(link)
Why is this trying to frame executing soldiers for cowardice in the face of the enemy as some strange and barbaric historical practice? The last execution for that offense in the US military was within living memory, and itâs still a capital crime.
Also, thereâs a lot of daylight between a General/President who believed in law, even law that is in retrospect -ist and cruel, and a âwarlord killerâ. Really not pleased with this historical revisionism.
I think you've misread Kulak (or are at least, unfamiliar with his output) if you're reading this as a condemnation of Washington. Kulak raises these to condemn modern conservatives for not doing these sorts of things anymore.
He brings up scalp bounties in the founding era because it's his preferred policy for handling illegal immigrants.
It's not that he considers executing soldiers for cowardice "strange and barbaric" â it's that he thinks too many other people do because we on the right aren't applying it to "boomercon" cowards right now.
He wrote an entire essay on why the right should stop denouncing right-wing political violence.
He wrote an entire essay advocating for assassination of random bureaucrats.
He calls Washington "a warlord killer" â in contrast to the "boomercon" â to argue that we should be "warlord killers" as well.
Kulak's whole thing is that violence is good, actually, and the right needs to embrace it. It's why he's constantly denouncing Christianity. As one mottizen put it, "Kulak is a genuine Pagan whose primary god is Violence itself."
Party consisting of a powerful human monarch, an alien invader, and an in-the-Christian-sense demon who independently started claiming to be the same god at the same time, and have to work together so they don't all get caught.
For bonus points, the god they're impersonating is 100% real and present, but refuses to interfere because they think the whole thing's hilarious.
Â
I've seen this on several posts now where someone outside the USA will see someone talking about their school experience here, and they'll ask "wait, do schools in America do X?"
I started noticing it on my own post that blew up about my old teacher's extra credit policy. Too many people asked this for me to want to answer individually, but, like, I want to be clear, for almost everything you want to ask from one American's account of their education, the answer is Yes and No. Do American teachers actually teach literature primarily with multiple choice tests? Well, several of mine did! Don't they use more essay and short answer questions? Well, other people's did!
We have 50 states that all have their own standards on education (though Texas and California have outsized influence on certain nationwide standards). There is the divide between public schools (more standardized to state standards) and private schools (they do their own thing to some extent, the extent they're allowed to can depend on the state). There is a spectrum of private schools that are the fancy ones that are meant to provide better education, and ones that are made with a focus on religious indoctrination (Catholic schools often have some elements of Both). There is a temporal divide, there have been huge changes in the legislated standards of education from when the millennials and older on Tumblr would have been in school, to what the teens and early twenty-somethings experience/d, to what the current teachers on here are expected to do. (No Child Left Behind is the most major and notable but not the only legal change).
My experience at a Midwestern religious school that was constantly scraping for money in the '00s will be very different from a public school in a major city in California today, which will also be different from a private school in Utah today, etc etc. When someone talks about their personal school experience that might just mean that's what their school did, not that it's something that the whole country does.
so much fiction is made by fundamentally knowledgeless people. Fantasy whose authress knows nothing of history, biology, or anthropology, only other fantasy. Cyberpunk writress with no understanding of political theory, sociology, or technology.
We increasingly live in a world without primary sources, or even secondary sources as the average creative is increasingly uncultured, only tertiary; ideas laundered until any context is sanded away. The median artist a dog that's never eaten food, only other dogs' vomit, some only their own vomit as franchises stumble through decades of self-referential undeath.
So much vitriol against AI art is that it is the previous norm at its most efficient: a mechanical dog that can imagine other dogs' vomit and conjure her own without first heaving.
Unironically yeah. If you're paid to write, it is your responsibility to be knowledgeable about your subject, I don't want to read or play games about swordfights by people who know nothing about swords. I practice HEMA and have a stack of Joachim Meyer's 1570 treatises on my shelf, I don't expect that from everyone but I do expect something.
If you're a hobbyist, I won't stop you from making poorly informed art, but this kind of knowledge is required for good art.
There is no arbitrary cutoff point between uneducated and educated, education should be something you pursue for your entire life. I have a degree in history, but most of the reading I've done in life has been outside of university. You can get free physical books, e-books, and audiobooks at your local library or online. I have no respect for copyright and the utmost respect for knowledge shared universally in sisterly love.
If you have the time, energy, and privilege to create, then you have the time, energy, and privilege to learn, and I reccomend it wholeheartedly. You owe it to yourself and to any potential audience you want. It's fun and deeply rewarding.
I don't want ill-informed, derivative junk, whether it was made by hand or by a machine. Nor do I want everything to perfectly mimic reality, but you need to understand something to subvert it.
I don't say all this to gatekeep; on the contrary, I'm holding the gate wide open and warmly inviting all inside to the kitchen to share ingredients and recipes so we can grow together and learn from each other instead of eating out of and throwing up into dumpsters alone outside.
ok, people keep putting this post on my dash.
first: i'm going to push back against the idea that we "increasingly live in a world without primary sources, or even secondary sources as the average creative is increasingly uncultured, only tertiary". not true!
capitalism is in its dying throes and as such the infrastructure of knowledge is put to the test, but it is certainly not burning faster than humanity as a whole can build it. the average creative is "increasingly uncultured" only because art has become increasingly democratized, causing the pool of artists to grow and encompass people without a formal art education, but uncultured is not the same as incurious.
and that's the thing you're really criticizing, right? is the average artist increasingly incurious, or are you exposed to an increasingly saturated market of incurious english-speaking artists? because this is at best a western-centric view, and frankly i'd call it USA-centric.
second: you are identifying something 100% real and i especially agree with the addition in this reblog. these people think we expect them to do 200 hours of research to write their favorite genre. no we don't! they can do anything they want. but if they don't do the research, their writing will be junk and we'll call it junk. fine by me, even. i love junk.
but they have a problem with that, because they fundamentally think they can write good or even politically impactful literature despite their anemic diet of western (really, US-made) art. they think the potential to make good art is innate to them. but unfortunately if you've only watched children's cartoons and listened to D&D podcasts it's quite hard to write fantasy, let alone a love story that can change the world.
so i'll say: not only is it fine to make slop and throw up in dumpsters for fun, because the products we create and consume are honestly not a huge deal in the grand scheme of things, and that includes art. but if one wishes to make great art, that it may be appreciated or just for the love of the craft, the resources are out there! access to influential media, useful data and information-collecting tools is better than ever.
if research seems terrifying and overwhelming, consider that you don't have to do it, and simply accept that you will make junk. there is no shame in that. just don't expect accolades, especially if you try to occupy the same space and genre labels as skilled or discerning people.
but more importantly, consider that maybe research is easier than you believe. getting easier, even. the same neural network breakthroughs that gave us AI slop are also letting us scan, transcribe and translate primary sources that were previously a pain to use, for example.
all this in addition to sharing our resources together, of course. in the end this is the important part. art is communication. so is research!
I agree, I would've worded some things differently had I known this post would get the traction it has. My initial vitriol was largely pointed at commercially successful artists, I'm angry at how uncultured and incurious people like George R. R. Martin and Dave Filoni are as opposed to like, anyone on AO3. People who received formal education, who are wealthy and whose only work is towards art, and who lack the expertise or vision of full-time minimum-wage autistic lesbians I hang out with.
And, specifically in my case, most of my reading is English audiobooks from my library in a US city at my housekeeping job, and my initial post was anger at how much of what's available to me to read that way, especially in terms of fiction, just is not very good, in the ways outlined above, and how much of that junk from smaller artists is bad because its regurgitating the product of the US's cultural hegemony which, in addition to being evil, is just producing total garbage.
I think the broad strokes, there is this polarization across art mediums of obscenely high-budget productions that as a result play it safe with the most marketable junk possible, and then extreme low-budget passion projects that are sometimes junk, sometimes great, but I could never bring myself to be hateful towards something made that way the way I am towards like, Baldurs Gate 3.
And on that note, I'm generally optimistic about the further accessibility and spread of knowledge, especially non-English research materials and art, and want to make sure that moreso than venom at garbage, I'm being encouraging towards the further sharing of art and knowledge that can be commonly enjoyed by all
The problem I have is that in the current market, someone as incurious and ill-informed as George RR Martin is rare. Instead you get mounds and mounds of books, entire bookstores and libraries of people who think walking in a caravan is the same as taking a bus or airplane, a horse is a motorcycle, a bow is a gun, hunger and food donât really matter, blocking in action scenes doesnât matter, and researching the most basic things and experiences on the level of common summer camp activities (ride a horse, shoot a bow, start a fire with matches, hike a few hours up a small mountain) is too much to ask.
âYou want me to read all 271 pages of Nuromancer to write cyberpunk? How -ist!â I want authors who are literate, informed, and knowledgeable in general facts at the level of a clever fourth grader at least.
Like, I have gotten halfway through so many midlist or even top selling recent fantasy and science fiction novels and⊠thereâs a reason why AI is sneaking in there; the only people worse at their craft than the writers are the editors, who are clearly asleep at the wheel if they are present at all.
"And I'm proud to be an American, where at least I have AC. and I won't forget the Brits who died in that heatwave in 03. And I'll gladly sit down, in my room, and enjoy that sweet cold air. That hot hot seethe and Euro cope, God Bless my Fridgedaire."
âandrewrinka4614
"Interestingly, I've heard the opposite claim: that the increased use of bodycams by police officers has backfired horribly for the BLM crowd, as the footage produced demonstrates that underclass black Americans are, if anything, even more irrational, unreasonable and short-tempered than the race realists claimed â really, Cops was underselling the scale of the problem. The claim that all disparities in offending rates (and types of offense) can be explained by socioeconomic factors alone grows more untenable with every passing day."
âFtttG
(link)
One nice privilege of working for large tech companies is that, as imperfect as the hiring process is, it does a pretty good job guaranteeing a reasonably high floor of intelligence and basic competence. I've had some coworkers who were annoying, some who were inexperienced, some who didn't have the same quality standards I do, and some who didn't see eye-to-eye with me or make decisions the way I would, but since getting real jobs I've actually never had a close coworkerâor for that matter a managerâ who was genuinely incompetent. This is actually really nice.
I think people who work at Big Tech sometimes don't realize this floor exists and is not universal. I know multiple cases of people who decided to quit tech and go work at a nonprofit or something, out of noble charitable impulse, and ended up going a little crazy because they had incompetent coworkers for the first time and hadn't developed the skills and temperament to handle this.
The other thing is that this type of person starts to believe that literally everyone is at the level of intelligence and competence to be hired by a Big Tech company.
This is a newspaper comic that started in the 1940s
Update: good for them.
this is getting traction outside the Precure fanbase where I think people are assuming a random anime was namedropped and are posting similar "nerdy" comic strips.
But I want to make clear why this is especially surreal and jarring to me and a lot of other Precure fans: This is an anime franchise that, for all intents and purposes, was almost completely unknown in the West - and hardly legally available at all - until literally last year and in fact I think this might be the very first time Precure has been referenced like this in any Western media...
...and it was in fucking Rex Morgan M.D.
Oh, and one final (wholesome) update:
saddest string of words ive ever read please get some self respect baby girl