The limitation of freedoms? It's a difficult question. You would think freedom all together would be overtly a good thing. Sometimes people take their individual freedom a bit too far. Cases where one person feels that it's their freedom to harm someone, take away their rights, or treat them lesser to make yourself feel comfortable. For instance, you have the freedom to drink and get drunk but you don't have the freedom to escape the repercussions of your actions whilst being drunk. Say if someone took somebody's life while being drunk... They had the freedom to be inebriated, have a good time, and be around other people. The moment they took that person's life their freedoms of being around other people, inebriated, or having a good time outside the walls of a correctional facility, should be taken as well.
I believe people should be free to the fullest degree as long as they are not hurting themselves or especially others. Long story long, I don't think that there should be limitations to freedom unless you're somebody who wishes to take another person's freedom.. In that case, the freedom taker should be limited.