Your Periodical Reminder to Dog On Henry Kissinger
here's your reminder that Henry Kissinger was lowkey an amoral Sack of Shit, a humanitarian crisis-and-a-half, and thought of people like pawns! so here is a non-exhaustive list of why you should join the Kissinger Freaking-Sucks Club (KFC)
Some people say he helped get us out of Vietnam but he helped expand the war to Cambodia and Laos before that
Operation Menu: Carpet bombing campaign in Cambodia which helped the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot come to power and kill about 2 million people. Nixon didn't inform Congress or ask their permission to bomb Cambodia, they were officially neutral at the time so it was unlikely Congress would have assented, so this whole thing was actually illegal (and a secret from the American people). The Khmer Rouge also tortured and experimented on people and forced kids to be in the military but that's a tweakout for another day
Operation Freedom Deal: Directly after Operation Menu, a MASSIVE bombing campaign (250,000 tons of bombs). >40% of the bombing runs hit outside the authorized zone, so Kissinger and Co. lied on the reports of those mission to cover it up. To elaborate on the Khmer Rouge bit, it caused more people to want to side with them because they could point to the bombings as a clear threat to civilians and something they needed to oppose
Operation Linebacker II and the Christmas Bombings: Lê Đức Thọ, a North Vietnamese diplomat, didn't want to accept some major last-minute changes to the October 1972 version of the Paris Peace Accords, so he stated the Americans had negotiated in bad faith, and returned to Vietnam. Nixon said Thọ had to come back to Paris in 72 hours or he would bomb North Vietnam without limit. Kissinger had reservations about this ultimatum, but gave in and approved of the decision because he knew Nixon was thinking about firing him. From December 18-29: 11 days of bombing (the heaviest of the entire war, and it was after North Vietnam already agreed to the October peace terms!!!), 40,000 tons of bombs, about 1500 casualties in Hanoi and Haiphong, all because Kissinger didn't want to lose his job. Thọ very deservedly berated Kissinger for over an hour after Kissinger tried to evade any responsibility.
Interventions in South American countries: Bolivia, Chile, Argentina, etc (more info below)
Bolivia (1971): The government became left wing and anti-imperialist, so then Kissinger and Co. helped Hugo Banzer with a coup (and then Banzer made it a dictatorship that banned civil rights and unions and made hundreds of Bolivians "disappear")
Chile (1973): A democratic-socialist was elected president, so Nixon's admin and Kissinger invested like $11 million to destabilize the Chilean government
Argentina (1976): He supported and congratulated the military junta on the Dirty War, saying they "had done an outstanding job in wiping out terrorist forces" even though US citizens had vanished/been killed in it, and openly said that he wanted them to succeed and do it quickly before Congress could stop military aid
The Chennault Affair: (still debated, I had a hard time finding reliable sources, take w/ large grain of salt)
Kissinger was a consultant to LBJ towards the end of his presidency, and was allegedly advising Nixon under the table, allegedly sabotaged peace negotiations between LBJ and North Vietnam (around 1968?), intended to make it look like the Democrats were incompetent at negotiating/ending the war so that Nixon could win the election
National Security Study Memorandum 200 (The Kissinger Report): used to justify promoting sterilization, abortion, and contraception in countries seen as threats to the US
Now look, you can have whatever beliefs you'd like about those things in general, but this isn't about people who choose to do those things, it's about having government-run programs (and pressuring countries to have them!!!) to intervene in what citizens may want for their families— we're talking potentially one-child-policy style. Pretty unethical, ESPECIALLY when you think about which countries got targeted by this: mainly countries with lots of resources and/or potential influence, and "LESSER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES"! You may think that population control is necessary to protect the environment but that bleeds a bit into ecofascism which is a whole other issue I'll tackle another day.
At any rate, the Kissinger Report said that the rapid increase of population would be a threat to the US because of increased competition for resources (based on Malthusian Theory which is generally considered inaccurate today) and because of potential political instability. After NSSM 200 got enshrined into US policy, the National Security Council encouraged refusing food aid to countries without population control programs and giving money to people who accepted sterilization: pressures that would be especially effective given the countries being targeted. The second one may not seem quite as bad, but think of the fact that the largest group of people this was aimed at was the poor of rural areas: meaning a struggling family could feel intense pressure to participate, whether they wanted the procedure or not, in order to make ends meet.
The Kissinger Report was also cited for (to some degree) influencing Peru's forced sterilization campaign from 1996-2000. Women weren't always informed about what was about to happen, were frequently coerced or forced (sometimes getting withheld food and healthcare until they agreed), and it mainly impacted vulnerable communities like Indigenous and impoverished women. There were quotas and monetary incentives for medical workers, and the whole operation was fueled by eugenics: Indigenous populations were called an obstacle to progress and "unfit for reproduction". Massive humanitarian issue!!! Anyway, little tangent over, I'll get back on track.
One of my biggest issues with the Kissinger Report is its focus on population control to combat poverty, instability, and food shortages for developing countries, instead of on aiding the countries so they wouldn't face those issues. It was written not out of care for people, but out of the classic interventionist policies of Mr. Realpolitik himself, Henry Kissinger.
At any rate, Henry Kissinger openly prioritized national interests over morality, ignored his conscience to keep his job, and was a gleeful proponent of intervention in other countries and their governments. Reading part of the Kissinger Report was what made me make this post to begin with, which is why it's the longest section and at the end. If you actually read the post, thank you so much! I hate on him because he spent many years being a respected though controversial figure in politics, long after the death of many of his Coeval Corrupt Cronies, so I hate on him in death to make up for the undue respect he was given in life.
I color emphasized it because Long-Ass-Posts are hard to read
This took me at minimum 5 hours because I tried really really hard to be accurate, if i made any mistakes, it was NOT intentional and I welcome any comments and constructive criticism. I care a lot about knowing the truth so please lmk!
Also, if you think of something big I missed, please comment, I'd love to know more!