Enjolras claimed that the nineteenth century would be great, but the twentieth century would be happy. (From my perspective in your future, I can admit to you that the twentieth century failed to live up to his grand plan.) What do you think? Will we ever have a happy century?
You begin with a questionable premise: I doubt even the being of a century. I banish it from my ontology; I declare it a great ruse practiced upon mankind. When anatomized, it vanishes into nothing.
What is a century but a collection of years, a year but an assembly of days, every day a handful of hours, each composed of minutes, themselves nothing more than seconds? Within each second, an infinity of moments, each ceasing to be real ere it can be noticed. What is this fleeting Atlas of existence, bearing all of time on vanishing shoulders? Teach me to believe in a moment, then speak to me of a century.
Yet, if a moment can be happy, why not a second, a minute, an hour? I have never encountered a happy century, but perhaps I have met with a happy day. And if I can believe in one, why not thirty-six thousand five hundred and twenty-five of them? It is no greater miracle. If you demand they all be together at once, that is no affair of mine.