Finding a thread on Twitter about moving over to fast-growth wood for heating as a form of renewable energy was... enlightening. In what reality is 8bil people burning literally anything "good"? That's how we got where we are. The second societies figured out a better way to produce heat and cold that didn't depend on either burning a forest or cutting ice from lakes in winter, they immediately switched.
Sure, the author threw around some jargon like "coppice agroforestry", but don't get it twisted, owning a dictionary is no substitute for lived experience. Particularly since the term translates to "repeatedly cutting down the same tree when it regrows". That's it. They're trying to market sapling harvesting. The wood isn't even that dense, which means you're burning wet saplings, which put out more smoke than dense older wood that's been dried for a season. This isn't informed ecology, it's "my afternoon on wikipedia". And whoa boy did this one get salty when people called them out for not knowing the first thing about building a fire for heat.
On the other hand, there's hundreds of incredible and ecologically sound indigenous solutions and none of them are woodburning: yakhchāls, adobe pueblos, terra preta... Answers utilized for thousands of years, and with very little mod they can be easily replicated. Instead weirdo anarcho-primitivists and anti-civilization types being here all "Screw diabetics, let's Cottagecore but as Game of Thrones instead of Lord o t Rings!" Pneumonia outbreaks add verisimilitude donchaknow.
It's part of why I'm vexed by the popularity of things like "seed bombing" as a long-term workable solution. One of the guy's ideas was spreading black locust trees and himalayan blackberry because they're pretty and fast-growing. Sure that has all the aesthetics of activism, but no thought. Both are invasive species that have contributed to forest fires.
Throwing random seeds around? Recommending invasive species?? That's ecoterrorism in a sock. It's how we ended up with kudzu, a vine slowly consuming the South US after being planted as 'ground cover' (I say slowly because "Exponentially growing to strangle every living thing under its blanket of death" seemed excessive).
I remember watching a vid on "earthships" and dude literally said "I'm here to tell people you don't have to live like some primitive in a teepee, you can live in this adobe mansion!" Adobe? The thing the "primitives" have been using for thousands of years? 'Ecodude', you put dirt in a used tire. Bro, within walking distance we've got Mountain Mutha Fuckin' Citadels and you're over here talking about teepees. How deliciously white supremacist: "I made it therefore it must be a totally original idea!"
I'm not advocating for inaction. Quite the contrary. On spec "regreening" is okay, in an ad-exec version of environmentalism kinda way. I guess I just find it funny how many memes and posts and YT videos I see all about "back to nature" and not a single Native local in frame, at all. It's telling. I'm advocating for deliberate and informed action in tandem with rigorous local knowledge and clear intent. But maybe that's hard to photograph. Or is it...











