Teaching and Learning with Web 2.0 Tools
After delving into the world of web 2.0 tools, some advantages to using these tools within a learning environment or specific activities have become quite apparent. First, collaboration is a core concept in web 2.0 tools. Study after study shows the effectiveness of collaboration in student achievement and the advantages in the area of student engagement are obvious to teachers who implement collaborative activities. When I think about the type of classroom I want to be in, whether it be in the role of teacher or learner, I want it to have an element of community that makes collaboration essential. Web 2.0 tools are also malleable and can be used to fit the scale and scope of different classes and lessons. As an instructional technology specialist, I have many disciplines and contexts that I assist with, so having a tool that is flexible is very appealing. I’d rather know fewer tools very well than hundreds tenuously.
Web 2.0 tools are also very good at creating a context for active learning. Active learning affords the possibility for student independence. Differentiation and extension are also possible with these types of tools. With active learning and the structure of these tools, students develop via inquiry based activities which afford a context for exploration. A feeling of openness and choice gives students intrinsic motivation to participate in active learning activities.
With this in mind, in the future, I would seek out and focus on tools that afford a balance of clarity in operation, but flexibility in application. For example, a tool like Padlet.com only has a few options for actions that users can take, but there is a huge variety of media and organization that makes the tool usable in many contexts. I am still looking for a tool that could take users entirely through the process of brainstorming to publishing a final product. Many will work well for collaboration and gathering of content, but fall short when users try to use content in a finished or polished context. I tried this with Miro.com and they tend to nickle and dime the user for file quality. It is just frustrating.
Now, web 2.0 tools are not all sunshine and roses. They take a lot of preparation for students to use them to their full capacity. Sometimes these tools have so much information that students can freeze up. It can be hard for students who have not had this much freedom within their learning environment to get started when they don’t have explicit instructions or direct guidance. It can take a little extra time to get them started and feeling comfortable with their new independence. Also, as a high school teacher my mind always goes to discipline. Asking students to collaborate and contribute will inevitably lead to inappropriate posts that will require moderation and draw the instructor’s attention away from the learning activity. Preparing for this ahead of time and having a plan to deal with discipline issues can help minimize those distractions.
When I think of the web 2.0 tools of the future, the main thing I want to avoid are completely free applications. The advertising strategies and data sharing practices compromise the integrity of the information presented and add an extra level of distraction that isn’t present in a subscription model. As I mentioned before, I’d rather have one or two quality tools that I am very knowledgeable of, even if I have to pay for them, than a whole host of free, ad-filled pop-up factories.











