I think what's super frustrating to me about this etymology nerd situation is that it demonstrates how out of touch academia is. People seem to forget that we go to school to learn the way things work so we can change/fix/learn how to do things better. Even if his analysis of the r-slur's usage is accurate (and based on what I've read from other linguists, it isn't) what is the point of studying and recognizing a linguistic pattern with potential to cause real harm if not to try and stop it?
And this is the fundamental problem with academia. When you spend all your time thinking about concepts and not actually seeing how those concepts function in the real world, you lose sight of the real people affected by the phenomena you're studying. As someone who knows very little about linguistics I probably would have taken him at his word had he said "hey, guys, here's this linguistic/concept theory that explains how the r-slur is coming back, it's important to understand this so you can recognize why these things happen and continue to discourage it in your own speech." But apparently instead we're supposed to throw up our hands in defeat and say "Oh gosh shucks darn it you guys, I guess the r-slur is back and there's nothing we can do about it!" Like what is the point of even studying anything if you're not going to apply what you've learned to anything beyond the abstract?


















