Being politically correct
EyeRight | May be Chinmayi didn't say anything disrespectful about the fishermen and the protesters didn't harass her. So, don't gang up on Bhargavi Chandrasekharan for not being politically correct. Remember, freedom of speech? Rationalism? Liberalism?
So Chinmayi, a playback singer gets a gang of tweeters arrested for harassing her in twitter, a social networking site. A lot has been talked about the alleged immature statements of Chinmayi about the fishermen of Tamil Nadu and the abusive protest directed at the singer as a consequence. On one side, the Tamil sentiments are hurt and on the other the feminists see this as an incident of sexual harassment online.
Whenever the bow of Tamil sentiment is invoked, naturally, the arrows of anti-Brahmin and anti-anything-not-Dravidian-according-to-the-protestor are shot at. On one hand, the sect quotes Kaniyan Poongundranaar: “Every town is mine and all the people my kin.” Of course, the revolutionary Periyar’s caste annihilation is rejoiced. This should make the protestors a liberal and rational lot, who think before ganging up on an immature statement, who are updated enough to know that the Indian fishermen who cross the accepted international maritime boundaries are actually infringing on the livelihood means of the Lankan Tamil fishermen. Though killing of fishermen is by no means justified, are the saviours of the fishermen aware that sometimes, the fault perhaps lies with our own fisher folks? Instead of goading them into the Katcha Theevu, which is not longer legally ours and regardless of their stand on that, shouldn’t the activists warn that it is not safe for the fishermen to cross the boundary lines until the diplomats find a solution for the issue? In our enthusiasm to take up social activism, is it right to instigate innocent, illiterate fishermen into the deep sea only to have them arrested or worse, killed?
[caption id="attachment_3701" align="alignleft" width="256"] Pic Courtesy - teachthought.com[/caption]
Obviously, Chinmayi has no idea about this. Though I fail to understand the hashtag campaign and its impact, I differ with her alleged opinions. Many witnesses swear that the singer compared the lives of fishermen with fishes. May be the vegetarian in her can see all the living beings for what they are and there really is no difference. You know, when a fish dies, its parents cry, the wife wail, the children suffer, the friends weep. A fish family is deprived of its basic means of livelihood when the head of the family fish dies. Or, in the alternative, there are so many fishes in the sea and the death of one fish does not impact another’s. In the fish world, the rule is to eat the “lesser” fish. Like life, fish, swims on. Is it not?
And then, there is the “caste”and “gender” angle.
Whatever is the nature of comment of Chinmayi, how correct it is to make sexually harassing remarks about her mother? If human beings can’t be compared with fishes, so can they not be abused based on their gender. And what is with the gang snubbing in social media? What do her tweets have to do with her being a female? Will it be less stinging if she were a male?
And what is this “Tamil” heart or a “Tamil” mind? My mother tongue is Tamil and my heart goes lub dub, that’s how all the hearts speak, technically. If English or Sanskrit or Swahili is only a language and not knowledge, the same logic applies to Tamil as well. Tamil being arguably oldest language of the world, I feel immense pride in communicating in the language. But playing identity politics based on language is just not logical. Also, typing Tamil words in English script hardly counts as a service to the language. Like the joke goes, a nanny in an Anglo Indian lady may wax eloquent in English, but that does not make her wise. Likewise, a nanny in a Tamil speaking home may be fluent in Tamil, but that does not maker automatically cultured and rational. We must not confuse the chalk with the cheese, for our own good.
I fear Tamil Nadu taking up the Maharashtrian model of all dangerous “isms.” One might be tempted to ask why the self proclaimed Dravidians are forever opposed to the Brahmins. I won’t ask though, as there are historic reasons to it, there have been decades of this one caste suppressing the fundamental rights of many sects. Still the socially backward classes face humiliation as a matter of routine. But how long can we have this ring of hatred around us? What about the upper caste mentality of the so called elite class? Where does it place the sane individuals who were raised in the so-called-upper caste families to be good human beings who treat others with respect and love but who now face the wrath of reverse oppression? Can their suffering ever be equated with the suffering of say, the Dalits who are still treated like animals in some places?
May be there will be come a time, when we do not have to identify ourselves based on archaic races, languages, political parties, complexions and genders. May be, deep inside our mask of identity, the human being in us is still alive. And that human being should not have gone to the extent of having the angry tweeters arrested, after all the punishment seems to far exceed the weight of the crime committed. To the tweeters – to ignore is human, to Chinmayi – not to take revenge is human. To self – to forget and forgive is totally human.