#fandom disappointment

[shallow-between-stars]

There's a special place in Hell for people who post their hate in the tags. 

...Just sayin'.

[ikkinthekitsune]

Hi Ikkin, came to visit you in your house, Molra (ASN) here. Came to say goodbye, it was a great run reading your issues, you're great, love you. I'm disappointed with this way of showing how innovative a show can be and how smart its creators are, by throwing away a 4-book narrative coherence, I'm sad more than happy and when this happens, it's time to move on. I've read better books, this one is closed. Wish you all the best, take care.

Aww, thank you very much.  I'm glad I was able to make your experience watching the show better, and I'm sorry that you're leaving the fandom.  =( 

[hyphenatedmess]

i've recently gotten really into the fosters but just looking into the fandom i gotta say helllll nope because i'm not here for that brandonxcallie ish

[therachelcontinuum]

Just useless drivel, just part of my fandom disappointment. 

Just looking for answers where there are none

I'm pretty sure the people I'm speaking of will never see this and I will never get a good answer.  If anyone can explain whether I am not understanding something here, I would love to hear.

Or am I caring what these people do too much, and therefore I shouldn't care either?  I probably have taken this too personally, but literally not one of these blogs follows me. :(   So you can't see my posts on your dash and you probably don't check the tags.

[isagrimorie]

*sigh* I want to love Agent of Shield, I do.

But right now I think Joss needs to poke his head in AoS's writers room and help his brother out.

Its like Jed Whedon is following a by the numbers procedural.

There are some interesting things that's being done but not enough to keep my interest, which is a shame since they have the MCU'verse to play with!

Break away from the stereotypes, stop trying to make your square jaw hero interesting because he's not! Use May more! Figure out what made Coulson interesting in the first place!

This show needs to focus on character work. A cheesy show can still have awesome character work. C'mon Jed & Co! We want to love this show! Make us love it!

[isagrimorie]

I found POI Chats in DW today, and they had a discussion about Ladykiller, and one thread was discussing Shaw, and it crystallized for me the other thing that annoyed me about the episode.

Not only was the number of the week a creeper (and they didn't even explain why he had a photo of a missing girl among his files) but it was also the episode where: "Everyone ganging up on Shaw to tell her she was insufficiently ladylike".

I feel like the writers should go back and watch Relevance and see how Shaw was written there because honestly some of their decisions are bizarre.

Stating that Shaw can't get a mark interested in her because she looked 'angry all the time'?

Screw you boys.

Shaw is an excellent agent with her distinctive skill being that she's able to multitask priorities and make it work.

And your Number of the Week is damned creepy I can't believe the writers let him slide just because he has a son, and he was telling the truth about one girl but we didn't get to see why he would have that photo of a missing girl.

[akaiba]

Well that's in three of my favourite fandoms I've encountered the shitstorm of hate going on currently. Here's looking at you hobbit fandom, you're next on my list to save me from the fan-hate. :( But hobbit fandom is all crying on each other about BOFA and loving dwarves at the moment so I should be safe... right?

[isagrimorie]

It's a real contrast how fandom reacts to Sam/Marley and Sam/Mercedes. Don't get me wrong Marley does seem like a nice character from all the gifs and Sam/Marley look good together but I remember when  Amber Riley received a lot of hate in her tweets for 'daring' to be with someone like Sam (Chord Overstreet).

They barely got to be a couple, their status as a couple was always vague or happened entirely off screen and I'm troubled at how they swept Sam and Mercedes' relationship under the table. Again.