seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Puerto Rico
seen from Malaysia
seen from Sweden
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
I am now going to drive the kingdom(your AU blog) to insanity and ask the most unhinged/weird/concerning/colorful asks there ever. You're welcome. [YOU GAINED +1 FOLLOWERS. Are they nice or just weird? You'll find out!]
...
sh
should I be concerned
You’re completely naked except panties, your ass is plugged, your nipples clamped and a ball gag in your mouth. I’m clothed and sitting back in an arm chair enjoying a drink while you’re straddled over my foot. You’re humping and grinding your needy drippy cunt on my boot. It’s not enough to scratch your it’s but it’s almost when you need. Yiure moaning and whimpering for something more are entertaining for me.. watching the drool hang from your chin onto your tits and rubbing down your stomach amuses me. Good girl, keep going, my boot is getting shiny and clean from your cunt polishing it with your juices.. I can feel my cock swelling in my jeans and I stand up to undo my pants and take my cock out. You’re not allowed to touch it or put it on your mouth. You’re not even allowed to look at it. You’re to maintain eye contact with me while I use your drool to stroke my cock inches from your face. I take your ball gag out to get more lube and your mouth is open wide, tongue out and drooling excessively. You’re like a little bird waiting to be fed. You’re doing such a great job of cleaning my boot, there’s a puddle forming on the floor.. you’re starting to make a mess slut but that’s ok, you’ll clean that up in a minute. I take your drenched panties off since your needy drooly cunt has ruined them and the direct contact between your swollen clit and the leather of my boot will provide the increased friction you’re aching for. With a fistful of your hair I guide your face to the puddle on the floor you’ve made. You’re now face down, ass up. Holes exposed and primed for use. I pull the plug from your asshole and watch it gape before forcing the head of my swollen cock in as it closes up tight.. “ Oh Oww Sir, you said you were going to fuck my pussy tonight”. Are the mumbled words I hear between moans and whimpers and your whore noises. “No dummy, you know we don’t use that hole. That’s just a lube dispenser for your fuckhole. Now shut up and clean your mess while I fill this hole. Your face gets pushed into the puddle and floor with each thrust of my cock driving balls deep into your asshole. I finally explode delivering a huge hot load of cum deep into your ass before pushing your plug back in . “Oh look at the time. I’ve got places to be, I’m going to shower, when you’re finished cleaning up your mess, you can let yourself out. I’ll see you tomorrow night at 7:00. My other boot still needs cleaning
🥵
My setting is like the real world but with various mythical otherworlds secretly connected to ours. One character with powers of psychic illusion was raised by an MiB-style intelligence and/or secret police force (tasked with keeping otherworldly beings from causing trouble in our world) that trained her to mentally torture people. I want to make this character somewhat sympathetic, so it is plausible for her to be indoctrinated as a torturer from childhood? Does it depend how young they start?
Anon I don’t think this is a good idea. There’s an awful lot to unpack here about why that is so I’m going to start off with a simple question that effects how you move forward: what’s most important for you about this character?
Is it that she’s sympathetic? That she’s effective at her job? That she’s highly skilled and trained? That she’s part of a productive organisation that can actually do the tasks it sets out to?
Because if she’s a torturer then realistically she would be none of those things. And making her any of them is (in my opinion) torture apologia: because it is portraying a torturer in an extremely unrealistic way that favours the torturer and excuses the abuse they carry out.
You would, literally, be repeating lies popularised by real life torturers.
Torture does not work. It is impossible to get accurate, timely information by using torture. Here’s an introduction to why. Here’s a post on what torture does to investigations. Here’s a guide to writing what torture does to interrogations. Here’s a list of investigative strategies that actually work. Here’s a post on the damage torture does to human memory. Please read these masterposts and take a look at my sources as well.
Torturers are not indoctrinated radicals. The organisations that torturers are part of actively try to screen out anything they see as radical, deviant or a product of illness. There aren’t enough studies on torturers for me to give you a break down of their politics but my impression from the anecdotes and interviews I’ve read? Their politics is ‘normal’ and mainstream for the organisation they are part of. Whatever that organisation is.
Torturers are not taught from a young age because torture is not complex. It does not take months to learn how to hit someone. Torturers learn on the job by assisting other torturers.
Torture is simple. It is functionally easy. I really can’t stress that enough. The most common tortures globally right now are: hitting people, depriving them of food and depriving them of sleep. I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that six year olds could come up with that list.
Hurting people is not complicated. It requires no skill and no training.
The evidence we have suggests torturers lose skills as they turn to torture, a process Rejali calls ‘de-skilling’. The basic idea is pretty simple: if you spend all day hitting people instead of practicing what you were trained for (gathering evidence for example) you get so out of practice that you start to forget how to do those things.
And then there’s the effect that torture has on torturers. They get symptoms. They develop lasting, serious, mental health problems which directly effect their ability to do their jobs.
I have a list of the common symptoms here as well as a rough guide for how many symptoms you should be considering for torturers and torture survivors.
Separate to the symptoms is the general pattern of behaviour torturers exhibit. We don’t have a lot of high quality studies on torturers and there are a lot of questions we do not have clear answers to. However the studies and the anecdotal evidence of survivors, witnesses and torturers themselves points to some consistent behaviours.
Torturers don’t work alone. They form little sub-cultures within larger organisations. These groups are incredibly aggressive, competitive, self-important, hyper-masculine and violent. Torturers look down on everybody else. They are convinced that they are the most important people in their organisation, the only one’s doing ‘real work’. They have an arrogant, puffed up pride that combines with mental illness and seeing their colleagues as competition to create the worst asshole you’ve ever had the misfortune of working with.
They do not cooperate with other people. They use abuse as a pissing contest, competing to see who can be the most brutal in order to try and ‘impress’ fellow torturers.
They define strength and group loyalty by hurting other people.
They have a fracturing effect on organisations, because they don’t obey orders and see their colleagues as competition or useless. At the low end of the scale this means cliques, secrets from the larger organisation and a terrible working environment as they bully and belittle their colleagues. At the high end of the scale there are cases where torturers have attacked and murdered people within the same organisation.
Does any of that sound sympathetic?
I like a challenge when I write. I’ve described my writing style as ‘hold my beer’ because I tend to take ideas other people dismiss as impossible to pull off and try my best to make them work. I do this because I love exploring human complexity through fiction.
A torturer who is currently torturing is not a sympathetic person. They are a bullying, violent, arrogant brute who contributes nothing useful to the organisation they latch on to, sucking up time and resources like a tick. They see other people as garbage. And they lack insight into their own crimes. Which means they do not appreciate or acknowledge the pain and damage they cause.
Now I have written a character who is an ex-torturer who I think is sympathetic in some ways. But getting to the point where they could be sympathetic meant them having to leave the organisation they were part of on a stretcher.
Their fellow torturers turned on them. They lost a leg. They changed sides and in the middle of a messy civil war they dedicated themselves to keeping their friend’s children safe.
And I had to set the story twenty years after these events to get that character out of their own ass enough for them to be sympathetic.
Even then, I’d say they’re sympathetic in spite of having been a torturer. Because they’re still clinging to that insistence that they did something meaningful. They still can’t accept the extent of their own crimes or the effects those crimes had.
But their pride broke. And they did keep those children alive. They helped raise them. And the tie to those children is what makes them sympathetic by the time of the story.
Torturers are not sympathetic people. They are self absorbed abusers who bend over backwards to downplay the harm they did to their victims and to justify their crimes.
Is that really what you want to write?
I say that, not to be harsh, but because it sounds to me as though what you actually want to write is a genuine investigator with psychic powers.
It sounds as though you want to write a character who is good at her job. Who is skilled and dedicated and a great person to work with.
If that’s the case my advice is to ditch the torture entirely. Look at the masterpost on genuine investigation instead and write a character who is good at interviewing people.
Have her use her psychic powers to present herself as sympathetic to the criminals she’s interviewing. Because she can walk into a room and know their politics, their religious beliefs, their internal justifications for what they’ve done. And she can use that, may be even manipulatively, to seem like someone the prisoner would like, someone they’d agree with.
That gets people talking.
And if you want to show her as ruthless, as having an edge to her, that can still work.
Imagine someone sitting down across from a suspect, holding their hands, smiling, talking to them gently. Imagine them gradually, kindly, getting this suspect’s life story. Imagine them being sympathetic about the reason the suspect murdered someone, validating the murder’s feelings and may be even actions… Right up until they have the information they need.
Then they turn on a dime. The persona drops, the false-sympathy drains away. They stand up with a sneer and say they hope the murderer never sees the light of day again. And walk out.
Think about what you want from the story Anon. A character who tortures, or a character who is competent, smart and sympathetic.
Because it really is one or the other.
Available on Wordpress.
Disclaimer
I don't know if this is my favourite but this is what popped into my head when i read your post.
I would just be going about my life as normal, but I would catch the eye of some witch or wizard.
But they wouldn't approach me, just follow me around day to day. And from the time of me first catching their eye, they start to mess with me. It all starts small, making me drop groceries, making items disappear and reappear in random places.
But then it would begin to escalate. All of a sudden my clothes start to catch on things in public and i'm caught without clothes. And then the cucumber i was preparing for dinner magically appears in my ass, or mouth.
by this point i'm losing my mind. My life is falling apart and I don't know what to do. So I go to find a witch or wizard to help me with what could only be a curse.
When I arrive they say "i've been expecting you"
The door slams shut behind me, but i think nothing of it. It must have been the wind. So i sit down and explain my issues and they say "I have just the thing"
they bring over a silky orangish red metallic liquid and say "drink every last drop".
So I toss it back its warm, creamy, and thick. I choke on it a little on the way down.
Then I start to feel like I'm losing control of my body. I begin to panic and ask "what's happening?"
They then proceed to tell me that they have been watching me, and playing little tricks on me.
They loved to see me get so flustered at the little things that kept happening that they couldn't help but raise the intensity.
They then tell me what I just drank "a concoction made with only the finest ingredients. Fire Dragon Cum, Fairy Squirt, and a touch of rosemary for aroma." "its a control potion, Now anything I tell you to do, you will do without hesitation"
I'll Let you Imagine the rest :)
Fantasy Ask Game:
Big into Wizards <3 Wizards are my jam <3 hahaha ⭐🌈⭐🌈
Fantasy Ask
Gnome
𝐆𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐞 - What is the weirdest thing you’ve eaten? Ok the weirdest I have ate is probably tortilla chips dipped in blueberry yogurt. Don’t judge me but it actually tasted so good, especially when you dip the other corner in salsa 😩
Hobgoblin. Magic.
Hobgoblin(Do you like anyone?): I do
Magic(Describe your crush without saying their name): Big heart, super sweet, such a cutie, doesn't live close
Goblin- What makes you happy?
Specter- Have you ever been in love?
Castle- What is something that not a lot of people know about you?
Potion Making- Would you kiss the last person you kissed again?
Goblin- What makes you happy?
Hmmm... first sip of coffee of the day, snuggles with my pets, writing, watching snow (I’ve done that a lot this month), listening to rain/thunderstorms, and baking.
Specter- Have you ever been in love?
Apparently, spirit and specter are the same questions... weird. Here is the answer I gave earlier : Hmm…yes and no? There are so many different types of love. Love for family, friends, pets, self (not so great at that one)…. but all of those types of love, definitely. Romantic love (I mean there’s Thomas Hunt 😏😍❤️) but, no, I don’t think so.
Castle- What is something that not a lot of people know about you?
I have a black belt in Taekwondo
Potion Making- Would you kiss the last person you kissed again?
First, I saw potion making and thought of Snape and I would definitely kiss Snape. Secondly, the last person I kissed wasn’t a person it was my dear Sherlock (horse) and I would definitely kiss him again ha. I mean look at this idiot (I promise he’s cuter than this most days! Hah)
In my world, there are three kingdoms. The two big kingdoms don’t like each other but they are peaceful with the smaller kingdom. Is there any reasons Kingdoms would be peaceful with another kingdom. (Sorry if the question isn’t specific, any reason would help). Thank you.
One reason is the kingdom has something the others don't. Take into account a milking stool that rests on three legs. If you snap off even one leg, the stool will fall over, yes? This is a bit like that. Every kingdom has a strength. Perhaps its economic, militant or even agricultural. An alliance between kingdoms ensures that no strength is used against an ally i.e cutting off a food supply, like Egypt during Octavian and Antony's war. Perhaps your little kingdom has the monopoly on a strength. Perhaps it is the focal point for trade on the continent or has a huge army or feeds the rest of the continent from its abundance in crops.
Reasons two could be power. Just because a kingdom is little doesn't mean its weak. Look at England who ruled (destroyed, ravished, invaded) most of the world at one point (haha look at the fucks now). Ants are tiny but strong as fuck. Maybe the little kingdom is the most powerful force in the world. Your other two kingdoms can pick on one another all they like but might balk at taking on the little one so they keep the peace. It is worth considering an arbitrary role for your little kingdom. Maybe the little kingdom steps in when there is about to be trouble, kind of like the mom of the group.
