i’m so interested in this concept! how do things like divorce and breakups typically look like in this verse?
ooh yes, so for better or for worse, there is no exact science to fatemarks (and resonances, bonds breaking, etc), and fatemarks aren't affected by any official, legal, or technical status a relationship has in real life. couples who have legally separated/divorced could still be actively resonated with each other due to lingering emotional attachments (such as the muse from our preset #2, incidentally).
for this reason, a bonded status on its own has no legal bearing, except for when it's being used as evidence (though even that can get highly contentious). canonically, lawmakers have tried to propose ways to allow bonds to provide legal protections the same way that marriages/civil unions/blood relations/etc do, but fatemarks are still considered so unquantifiable and so beyond human control, that it's hard to get any legislation to stick. the presence or non-presence of a fatemark/bond can influence the court of public opinion, but that's usually as far as it goes, at least within this verse's setting of south korea.
(on this note, it would be interesting if different countries have different legislations, but i didn't specify those for the sake of not writing ten more pages of lore --- but if that is something you would be interested in fleshing out for your muse's background specifically, i'd love to work with you on making it part of the larger canon!)
legal considerations aside, fatemarks have already made breakups messier for many people—since the forming & breaking of bonds is highly influenced by the weight of human emotions involved, the state of a bond and the status of a relationship could often look out of sync, in a myriad of ways. a crumbling relationship might see their resonance fade before they've even officially separated; conversely, a divorced couple might remain bonded to each other even though they legally separate & remarry others. if you break up with someone but your bond doesn't break, that might make you wonder why, is it your ex partner that still cares for you, or do you still actually care for them but just don't know it? which really might be enough to drive someone crazy. but, of course, no one would warn you about this part when they're waxing poetic about fatemarks; in this verse, the focus is nearly always on the beginning of a bond, which is a calculated approach---they don't want you to think about what divorces/breakups/endings look like, because they ultimately want to sell the fantasy that a fatemark will help you find your one true forever bond.
i have to stop myself before i keep rambling, but if it was a specific technical or legal context that you were interested in more, feel free to send another ask!














